岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1313-1323.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2429

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土体三维卸荷弹塑性模型及其试验验证

张坤勇1, 2,臧振君1, 2,李 威1, 4,文德宝3,Charkley Frederick Nai1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 江苏省岩土工程技术工程研究中心,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 中设设计集团股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210098;4. 中交疏浚技术装备国家工程研究中心有限公司,上海 200120
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-07 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-24
  • 作者简介:张坤勇,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土的基本特性、土与结构相互作用及岩土工程数值分析等方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41530637,No. 51578214)。

Three-dimensional elastoplastic model of soil with consideration of unloading stress path and its experimental verification

ZHANG Kun-yong1, 2, ZANG Zhen-jun1, 2, LI Wei1, 4, WEN De-bao3, CHARKLEY Frederick Nai1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Jiangsu Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. China Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4.CCCC National Engineering Research Center of Dredging Technology and Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2017-12-07 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41530637, 51578214).

摘要: 天然土体经历开挖卸荷应力路径后,其应力变形特性与常规加载应力路径条件下规律存在较大差异。目前常用土体本构模型大多建立在等向固结单向加载三轴试验基础上,没有考虑初始K0固结和开挖卸荷应力路径的影响。以剑桥模型为基础,借鉴关口-太田模型的建模思想,通过引入新的应力比参数,对p-q平面上屈服轨迹硬化轴进行旋转,调整弹性区范围,以反映初始K0固结的影响;再运用变换应力法将模型三维化处理,从而使模型可以描述土体三向不等向应力状态,最终得到一个能综合反映土体K0固结开挖卸荷应力-应变特性的三维弹塑性本构模型。通过和典型室内应力路径试验结果进行对比,验证了模型的合理性。

关键词: 开挖, 弹塑性模型, 各向异性, 本构模型

Abstract: When the natural soil is influenced by the unloading induced by the excavation, its stress-strain relationship shows a quite difference with the relationships obtain from the conventional loading test of undisturbed natural soil. At present, commonly applied soil constitutive models are established based on the conventional tri-axial test, where soil is subjected to isotropic confine pressure and uni-axial loading stress. In addition, these constitutive models do not take the influence of initial K0 consolidation and the unloading induced by excavation into consideration. In this paper, a new model is proposed based on the Cam-clay model and the principles of Ohta-Sekiguchi model. In the proposed model, to adjust the elastic region and reflect the influence of the initial K0 consolidation, the hardening axis in p–q stress space is rotated by introducing a stress ratio. To describe the three-dimensional anisotropic stress state, the transformation stress method is introduced to the model. By all these approaches above, this newly proposed model is able to reasonably describe the strength and deformation of soil under initial K0 stress and complex stress-train relationships under unloading induced by excavation. The rationality of this proposed model is verified by comparing the predicted results with the results obtained from typical laboratory tests.

Key words: excavation, elastoplastic model, anisotropy, constitutive model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[5] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[6] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[7] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[8] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[9] 王洪新, 沈旭凯. 考虑支撑作用的基坑抗隆起稳定安全系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[10] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[11] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[14] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[15] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!