岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 4105-4115.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0338

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

边坡降雨入渗问题中两种边界条件的 处理及应用

年庚乾,陈忠辉,张凌凡,包敏,周子涵   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-25 修回日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 作者简介:年庚乾,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事边坡工程等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2016YFC0801602,No.2017YFC1503103)

Treatment of two boundary conditions for rainfall infiltration in slope and its application

NIAN Geng-qian, CHEN Zhong-hui, ZHANG Ling-fan, BAO Min, ZHOU Zi-han   

  1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-03-25 Revised:2020-06-16 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC0801602, 2017YFC1503103).

摘要: 基于饱和?非饱和渗流的Richards方程,以COMSOL Multiphysics有限元数值计算软件为平台,针对边坡降雨入渗问题中的入渗边界条件和渗流(溢出)边界条件,以孔隙水压力为控制条件,推导了二者的控制方程,并以二维土柱模型及已有文献中的实例模型为基础,探讨了控制方程中边界耦合长度尺度L的取值,结果发现L为0.001 m时较为合理。建立简单二维边坡模型,应用上述边界条件的控制方程,分析了不同降雨强度(长而弱、短而强)下,边坡降雨的入渗及渗流规律。结果表明:4 mm/h的降雨强度下,实际入渗率始终等于降雨强度,表层土体的体积含水率从0.29增至0.35,降雨75 h时坡脚处发生表面渗流,降雨200 h时研究区域总入渗量为39.068 m3;40 mm/h的降雨强度下,实际入渗率首先等于降雨强度,然后逐渐减小,表层土体的体积含水率从0.29增至0.415(饱和),降雨4 h时坡脚处发生表面渗流,降雨20 h时研究区域总入渗量为26.908 m3,降雨量相同但其值远小于前者。该结论与已有研究的边坡降雨入渗规律相符,进一步证明了上述边界条件控制方程的可靠性,为边坡降雨的有限元数值分析中边界条件问题提供了一种可行方法。

关键词: 边坡, 降雨入渗, Richards方程, 边界条件, 控制方程

Abstract: Using the Richards’ equation of saturated-unsaturated seepage, the commercial Multiphysics finite element software COMSOL is adopted to deduce the governing equations of two boundary conditions with the pore water pressure as the control variable for the infiltration and seepage (overflow) boundary conditions in the rainfall infiltration problem of slope. Based on the two-dimensional soil column model and the published models, the value of the boundary coupling length scale L in the governing equation is discussed, and L equal to 0.001 m is found reasonable. A simple two-dimensional slope model is then established, and the governing equations of the above boundary conditions are applied to analyze the infiltration and seepage law of rainfall with different intensities (long and weak, short and strong). The results show that when the rainfall intensity is 4 mm/h, the actual infiltration rate is always equal to the rainfall intensity, and the water content of the surface soil has increased from 0.29 to 0.35. When the surface seepage has occurred for 75 h at the foot of the slope, the total infiltration of the study area at 200 h is 39.068 m3; when the rainfall intensity is 40 mm/h, the actual infiltration rate first equals the rainfall intensity, and then gradually decreases, and the water content of the surface soil increases from 0.29 to 0.415 (saturated). When the surface seepage has occurred for 4 h at the foot of the slope, the total infiltration of study area at 20 h is 26.908 m3, which is far less than the former. This conclusion is consistent with the existing rainfall infiltration law in slope, which further proves the reliability of the above boundary condition governing equations that provides a feasible method for the boundary condition problem in finite element analysis of rainfall in slope.

Key words: slope, rainfall infiltration, Richards’ equation, boundary condition, governing equation

中图分类号: 

  • TU42
[1] 凌道盛, 赵天浩, 钮家军, 朱松, 单振东, . 混合非齐次边界下非饱和土一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
[2] 陶志刚, 任树林, 郝宇, 李强, 付强, 何满潮, . 层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果 物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 976-990.
[3] 章瑞环, 叶帅华, 陶晖. 基于改进极限平衡法的多级均质黄土边 坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 813-825.
[4] 王力, 李高, 陈勇, 谭建民, 王世梅, 郭飞, . 赣南地区人工切坡降雨致灾机制现场模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 846-854.
[5] 郑 宏, 张 谭, 王秋生. 弹塑性有限元分析中几个难点问题的一揽子方案[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 301-314.
[6] 赖天文, 雷浩, 武志信, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维增强复合材料在高边坡防护中的 振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 390-400.
[7] 安宁, 晏长根, 王亚冲, 兰恒星, 包含, 许江波, 石玉玲, 孙巍锋, . 聚丙烯纤维加筋黄土抗侵蚀性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 501-510.
[8] 金爱兵, 陈帅军, 赵安宇, 孙浩, 张玉帅, . 基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 255-264.
[9] 李英俊, 夏元友, 王智德. 地震作用下土钉支护边坡震后位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3013-3021.
[10] 蒋水华, 刘源, 章浩龙, 黄发明, 黄劲松, . 先验概率分布及似然函数模型的选择对边坡可靠度评价影响的定量评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3087-3097.
[11] 张天龙, 曾鹏, 李天斌, 孙小平, . 基于主动学习径向基函数的边坡系统可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3098-3108.
[12] 潘永亮, 简文星, 李林均, 林雨秋, 田朋飞. 基于改进Green-Ampt模型的花岗岩 残积土边坡降雨入渗规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2685-2692.
[13] 安彩龙, 梁 烨, 王亮清, 邓 姗, 孙自豪, 范斌强, 郑罗斌. 岩质边坡楔形体锚索加固方向角三维优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2765-2772.
[14] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[15] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[6] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[7] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[8] 杜佐龙,黄茂松,李 早. 基于地层损失比的隧道开挖对临近群桩影响的DCM方法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3043 -3047 .
[9] 陈 松,徐光黎,陈国金,吴雪婷. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡滑带工程地质特征研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3048 -3052 .
[10] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .