岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 183-192.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0258

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

变荷载下考虑井阻随时空变化的竖井地基固结解

史蓝天,李传勋,杨洋   

  1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-07 接受日期:2022-05-10 出版日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 作者简介:史蓝天,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878320);江苏省自然科学基金(No. BK20190833)。

Analytical solution for consolidation of soft soils with vertical drains by considering variable well resistance with time and depth and time-dependent loading

SHI Lan-tian, LI Chuan-xun, YANG Yang   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China
  • Received:2022-03-07 Accepted:2022-05-10 Online:2023-01-16 Published:2023-01-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878320) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190833).

摘要: 竖井排水固结法中井阻随时空演变(即由淤堵和弯折所引起的竖井排水能力下降)的现象已引起广泛关注,且变井阻对竖井地基固结速率的影响不容忽略。但目前能同时考虑变荷载及井阻随时间和空间变化的固结解析解还鲜有报道。考虑井阻随时空演变过程,引入实际中广泛采用的单级或多级加载模式,建立了竖井地基固结模型,并应用分离变量法获得固结模型的解析解答。通过与已有的解析解、有限差分解及工程实测值进行对比分析,充分验证了该模型的正确性。通过大量的计算,分析变井阻参数对竖井地基固结性状的影响。结果表明:竖井地基固结速率随竖井最终排水能力的增大而加快,随深度井阻参数及时间井阻参数的增大而减缓,且时间井阻参数的影响更为显著。

关键词: 软土固结, 变井阻, 变荷载, 竖井地基, 解析解

Abstract: The phenomenon that the well resistance changes with both time and depth (i.e., the decrease of drainage capacity caused by silting and bending) has been widely concerned during the consolidation of soft soils with vertical drains. Moreover, the influence of variable well resistance on consolidation rate of soft soils with vertical drains cannot be ignored. However, there are few analytical solutions for consolidation which can consider the time-dependent loading and the variation of well resistance with time and depth at the same time. Considering the evolution process of time-and depth-dependent well resistance, a consolidation model of soft soils with vertical drains is developed by incorporating a single stage loading or a multistage loading which is widely adopted in practice, and the analytical solution of the consolidation model is obtained by using the separation of variables method. The correctness of the model is fully verified by comparison with the existing analytical solutions, finite difference solutions and engineering measured values. Finally, the influences of variable well resistance parameters on consolidation behavior of soft soils with vertical drains are analyzed through a lot of calculations. The results show that the consolidation rate of soft soils with vertical drains increases with an increase in the final drainage capacity of vertical drains, and decreases with an increase in the value of depth resistance parameters and time resistance parameters, and influences of time resistance parameters on the rate of consolidation are more significant.

Key words: consolidation of soft soil, variable well resistance, time-dependent loading, vertical drain, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[2] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
[3] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[4] 余俊, 张志中, 郑靖凡, 和振. 水位波动条件下有封底基坑渗流场孔压解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3415-3423.
[5] 余俊, 张扬, 郑靖凡, 张志中. 考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3109-3116.
[6] 李炯, 李明广, 詹红兵, 陈锦剑, 夏小和, 张硕. 井周堵塞对承压含水层定流量回灌渗流场影响的半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2871-2878.
[7] 朱赛男, 陈艳华, 王宁, 李伟华, 张为为. 平面P1波入射下海底隧道与海床土交界面 滑移接触效应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3049-3058.
[8] 韩佳明, 董照, 苏三庆, 马鑫, 李冠兵, . 均质非饱和边坡降雨入渗解析解及在黄土边坡的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 241-250.
[9] 秦爱芳, 孟红苹, 江良华. 电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 97-106.
[10] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[11] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[12] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 刘建文, 彭铸, . 邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖对下卧 盾构隧道影响的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2176-2190.
[13] 吴思思, 罗文强, 李寅灿, 崔伟健, 王硕. 连续排水边界下考虑变荷载的软土一维 非线性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1503-1512.
[14] 杨涛, 吉映竹, . 变荷载下长排水体-短不排水桩 复合地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1187-1196.
[15] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627 -3634 .
[4] 刘小丽,张丹丹,刘 凯,苏媛媛. 一种直剪式模型试验设备的设计及应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 475 -480 .
[5] 康永君,杨 军,宋二祥. 地震作用下边坡安全系数时程计算及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 261 -268 .
[6] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[7] 李荣建,于玉贞,吕 禾,李广信. 饱和砂土地基上抗滑桩加固边坡的动力离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 897 -902 .
[8] 周万欢 ,殷建华. 上覆压力和剪胀作用下土钉抗拔的有限元模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 691 -0696 .
[9] 钱建固 ,黄茂松. 土体塑性各向异性的微宏观机理分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 88 -93 .
[10] 朱崇辉 ,王增红 ,希罗科夫 B. H.. 单点击实法击实试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 60 -64 .