岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3109-3116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.2019

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑潜水面的基坑二维稳态渗流场解析解

余俊,张扬,郑靖凡,张志中   

  1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-30 接受日期:2023-03-09 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-28
  • 作者简介:余俊,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078496)。

Analytical solution of two-dimensional steady-state seepage field in a pit considering a phreatic surface

YU Jun, ZHANG Yang, ZHENG Jing-fan, ZHANG Zhi-zhong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2022-12-30 Accepted:2023-03-09 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science of China (52078496).

摘要: 对考虑潜水面悬挂式止水帷幕支护下的基坑二维稳态渗流场进行了解析研究,并给出一种求解潜水面的解析方法。根据对称性取基坑半截面,并根据边界的连续条件将其分为3个规则区域,使用分离变量法分别将3个区域的水头分布表示为级数解的形式,结合区域之间的连续性条件及级数正交条件得到各区域渗流场的显式解,根据潜水面所满足的总水头等于位置水头的条件确定潜水面。将解析解方法计算结果与室内试验、有限元分析结果进行比对分析,结果验证了解析解的正确性,解析方法相较于有限元数值方法具有更高效的计算效率。对潜水面位置进行参数分析,发现止水帷幕插入深度、基坑宽度及深度对潜水面位置有不可忽视的影响。随着过水断面厚度的增加,潜水面位置逐渐降低,不考虑极端状态的情况下可认为帷幕底部至不透水层顶面的距离与潜水面在止水帷幕上的位置呈线性关系;随着基坑尺寸的增加,潜水面位置呈下降趋势,基坑内侧半宽度对潜水面的影响明显小于帷幕底部至不透水层顶面的距离,且随着基坑内侧半宽度的增加影响越来越小;潜水面位置随着基坑深度的增大而降低,基坑深度对潜水面位置的影响相对较大。

关键词: 基坑, 止水帷幕, 潜水面, 二维稳态渗流, 解析解, 渗流

Abstract: The two-dimensional steady-state seepage field of the foundation pit under suspended waterproof curtains support considering the phreatic surface is studied analytically, and an analytical method for solving the phreatic surface is given. According to the symmetry, the half section of the foundation pit is taken, and it is divided into three regular regions based on the continuity conditions of the boundary. The variable separation method is used to express the water head distribution in the three regions as a series solution. The explicit solution of the seepage field in each region is obtained by combining the continuity conditions between regions and the orthogonality conditions of the series. The water table is determined based on the condition that the total water head satisfied by the water table is equal to the position water head. The analytical solution in this paper is compared with the results of laboratory tests and finite element analysis, the results verify the correctness of the analytical solution, which has higher efficient computational efficiency than that of the finite element numerical method. Performing a parametric analysis of the phreatic surface location, it was found that the insertion depth of waterproof curtain, the width and depth of foundation pit have a non-negligible effect on the phreatic surface location. As the thickness of the cross section increases, the position of the phreatic surface gradually decreases, and the distance from the bottom of the curtain to the top surface of the confining stratum has a linear relationship with the position of the phreatic surface on the waterproof curtain, without considering the extreme conditions. As the size of the foundation pit increases, the location of the phreatic surface shows a downward trend. The influence of the inner half width of the foundation pit on the phreatic surface is significantly smaller than that of the distance from the bottom of the curtain to the top surface of the confining stratum, this influence decreases with increasing the inner half width. The location of the phreatic surface decreases as the depth of the foundation pit increases, and the depth of the foundation pit has a relatively large influence on the location of the phreatic surface.

Key words: foundation pit, waterproof curtain, phreatic surface, two-dimensional steady-state seepage, analytical solution, seepage

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+3
[1] 张玉国, 杨文兵, 赵雅纯, 王闯, 赵亚敏. 双向渗流下考虑应力时空效应的组合桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 184-196.
[2] 周闯, 钱建固, 尹振宇, . 各向异性砂土渗流潜蚀流体动力学-离散元 流固耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 302-312.
[3] 屈小磊, 张云开, 陈悠然, 陈悠扬, 戚承志, . 耦合渗流-变形的数值流形法裂隙岩质 边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 313-324.
[4] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 27-49.
[5] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[6] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[7] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
[8] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
[9] 尹鑫晟, 舒营, 梁禄钜, 张世民, . 考虑渗流的饱和粉土地层盾构开挖面稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2005-2016.
[10] 刘东东, 魏立新, 徐国元, 项彦勇, . 基于裂隙连续方法的三维裂隙岩体渗流传热数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2143-2150.
[11] 甘磊, 刘玉, 张宗亮, 沈振中, 马洪影, . 岩体裂隙粗糙度表征及其对裂隙渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[12] 王旭, 董梅, 孔梦悦, 邓云鹏, 徐日庆, 龚晓南, . 基于扩散波近似方程的降雨边界处理的改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1761-1770.
[13] 马国良, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成. 不同水力荷载路径下煤体微观渗流特征及宏观破坏研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1779-1788.
[14] 崔瑜瑜, 吴立鹏, 沈兴华, 王兴召, 秦亚琼, 刘杰, 卢正, 吴磊, . 粉质黏土基坑卸荷隆起变形的简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1425-1434.
[15] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张宜虎,周火明,邬爱清. 结构面网络模拟结果后处理研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2855 -2861 .
[2] 杨 光,孙 逊,于玉贞,张丙印. 不同应力路径下粗粒料力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1118 -1122 .
[3] 闻世强,陈育民,丁选明,左威龙. 路堤下浆固碎石桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1559 -1563 .
[4] 张常光,张庆贺,赵均海. 非饱和土抗剪强度及土压力统一解[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1871 -1876 .
[5] 杨天鸿,陈仕阔,朱万成,刘洪磊,霍中刚,姜文忠. 煤层瓦斯卸压抽放动态过程的气-固耦合模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2247 -2252 .
[6] 胡秀宏,伍法权. 岩体结构面间距的双参数负指数分布研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2353 -2358 .
[7] 李卫超,熊巨华,杨 敏. 分层土中水泥土围护结构抗倾覆验算方法的改进[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2435 -2440 .
[8] 张桂民 ,李银平 ,施锡林 ,杨春和 ,王李娟. 一种交互层状岩体模型材料制备方法及初步试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 284 -289 .
[9] 王 伟 李小春 李 强 石 露 王 颖 白 冰. 小尺度原位瞬态压力脉冲渗透性测试系统及试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3185 -3189 .
[10] 胡 存,刘海笑,黄 维. 考虑循环载荷下饱和黏土软化的损伤边界面模型研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 459 -466 .