岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 896-907.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0482

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究

郭景琢1, 2,郑刚2,赵林嵩2,潘军2,张宗俊2,周强1,程雪松2   

  1. 1. 中国建设基础设施有限公司,北京 100044;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-10 接受日期:2022-05-30 出版日期:2023-03-21 发布日期:2023-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 程雪松,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土力学与工程的教学与科研工作。E-mail: cheng_xuesong @163.com E-mail:63431562@qq.com
  • 作者简介:郭景琢,男,1979年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事基坑、隧道工程建设管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中建股份科技研发计划资助(CSCEC-2021-Z-25);中建基础科技研发课题(CSCIC-2020-KT-01);国家自然科学基金(No.52178343)。

Experimental study of soil deformation and pore pressure caused by multi-row grouting

GUO Jing-zhuo1, 2, ZHENG Gang2, ZHAO Lin-song2, PAN Jun2, ZHANG Zong-jun2, ZHOU Qiang1, CHENG Xue-song2   

  1. 1. China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2022-04-10 Accepted:2022-05-30 Online:2023-03-21 Published:2023-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the R&D Program of China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd. (CSCEC-2021-Z-25), the R&D Program of China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., (CSCIC-2020-KT-01), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178343).

摘要: 目前尚未见到软土地区多排孔注浆引起土体变形和超孔压发展规律的系统研究,限制了注浆变形主动控制策略的深化发展。开展了多排孔注浆现场试验,系统研究了单排孔逐孔注浆、多排孔逐排注浆引起土体水平位移和超孔压的变化与叠加规律。研究表明,注浆引起的超孔压随距离衰减迅速,变化规律可用幂函数表达,注浆距离取3 m左右时纠偏效果较好;天津地区超孔压消散较快,有利于注浆控制变形的快速稳定,超孔压随时间的消散规律可用指数函数表达,并提出了计算注浆引起超孔压的经验公式;多排孔逐排注浆时,先行注浆形成的注浆体墙对后续注浆一侧及另一侧土体变形分别具有反力效应和遮挡效应,控制既有建构筑物变形时应遵循“先远后近”逐排注浆的原则,以提高变形控制效果。

关键词: 注浆法, 土体变形, 原位试验, 超静孔隙水压力, 多排孔注浆

Abstract: There was no systematic study on the development law of soil deformation and excess pore pressure caused by multi row hole grouting in soft soil area to date, which limits the deepening development of active control strategy of grouting deformation. In this study, field tests of multi-row grouting were carried out to systematically examine the variation and superposition law of soil horizontal displacement and excess pore pressure caused by single-row hole-by-hole grouting and multi-row row-by-row grouting. The research shows that the excess pore pressure caused by grouting decreases rapidly with distance, and the variation law can be expressed by a power function. It is recommended that the grouting is about 3 m or closer to the object. At this time, the grouting correction effect is the best. The excess pore pressure caused by grouting dissipated rapidly in Tianjin, which is conducive to the rapid stability of the deformation controlled by grouting. The dissipation law of excess pore pressure over time can be expressed by an exponential function, and an empirical formula for calculating excess pore pressure caused by grouting is put forward. When multiple rows of holes are grouted row by row, the wall formed by prior grouting has reaction force effect and shielding effect on the soil deformation on one side and the other side of the subsequent grouting respectively. When controlling the deformation of existing buildings and structures, the principle of “far before near” row by row grouting shall be followed so as to improve the effect of deformation control.

Key words: grouting method, soil deformation, in situ test, excess pore water pressure, multi-row grouting

中图分类号: 

  • TU433
[1] 李波, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 凌造, 苏定立, 侯振坤. 随钻跟管桩钻孔卸荷与后注浆效应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1052.
[2] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[3] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[4] 安然, 孔令伟, 师文卓, 郭爱国, 张先伟, . 结构性黏土的原位刚度衰减规律及数学表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 410-418.
[5] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[6] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[7] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[8] 王东坡, 何启维, 刘彦辉, 温继伟, 李伟, . 滚石冲击改进型开口帘式网耗能机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3356-3365.
[9] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[10] 史旦达, 毛逸瑶, 杨勇, 原媛, 郝冬雪, . 基于DIC技术的砂土中圆形锚板上拔土体 变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3201-3213.
[11] 曹 渊,牛冠毅,王铁良,王英杰,. 基于原位渗透率试验反演岩石孔隙度的新方法[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 272-276.
[12] 温 勇,杨光华,汤连生,徐传堡,黄致兴,黄忠铭,张玉成, . 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 209-215.
[13] 张 昕 ,乐金朝,刘汉东,. 砂土中群锚锚周土体变形特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 240-248.
[14] 王志丰 ,沈水龙,谢永利,. 水平旋喷桩施工引起周围土体变形分析[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1083-1088.
[15] 陈育民,张意江,王维国,陈晨伟, . 爆炸液化场地中浅埋钢筋混凝土结构动力响应的现场试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3506-3512.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 刚性桩复合地基-上部结构动力相互作用体系抗震性能及影响因素分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3505 -3511 .
[2] 甄文战,孙德安,段 博. 不同应力路径下超固结黏土试样变形局部化分析[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 293 -298 .
[3] 邬 凯,盛 谦,梅松华,李 佳. PSO-LSSVM模型在位移反分析中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1109 -1114 .
[4] 刘 镇,周翠英,朱凤贤,张 磊. 软岩饱水软化过程微观结构演化的临界判据[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 661 -666 .
[5] 罗耀武,胡 琦,凌道盛,陈 峥,陈云敏. 桩-土界面特性对砂土地基中抗拔桩承载特性影响的模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 722 -726 .
[6] 孙 冰,曾 晟,丁德馨,綦春明,喻 清. 低应变动测桩及锚杆中波的传播规律差异研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1143 -1148 .
[7] 陈振华 ,李玲玲 ,王立忠 ,许 沿 ,杨 艺. 海堤加筋的分析测试与材料选用[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1824 -1830 .
[8] 严耿升,张虎元,王晓东,杨 博,李 敏. 干旱区土建筑遗址冻融耐久性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2267 -2273 .
[9] 张 波 ,李术才 ,张敦福 ,李明田 ,邵冬亮. 简谐波在黏弹性介质中波动传播的应力场研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2429 -2434 .
[10] 郭小红 ,陈飞飞 ,褚以惇 ,乔春江. 富水软弱带公路隧道支护技术研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 449 -454 .