岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 673-684.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0567

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究

张昕1,董浩1, 2,徐迎迎1,王柳月1   

  1. 1. 华北水利水电大学 地球科学与工程学院,河南 郑州 450046;2. 浙江华东咨询工程有限公司,浙江 杭州 310014
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-20 接受日期:2022-09-02 出版日期:2023-03-21 发布日期:2023-03-23
  • 作者简介:张昕,女,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学试验及理论研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2019YFC1509704);国家自然科学基金(No.U1704243);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(20A410002);河南省留学人员科研择优项目。

Experimental study on the bearing capacity of piles in sand under cyclic loading

ZHANG Xin1, DONG Hao1, 2, XU Ying-ying1, WANG Liu-yue1   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 2. Zhejiang Huadong Consulting Engineering Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China
  • Received:2022-04-20 Accepted:2022-09-02 Online:2023-03-21 Published:2023-03-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program (2019YFC1509704) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1704243), the Foundation of Henan Educational Committee (20A410002) and Henan Province Foundation for Returness.

摘要: 采用自主设计的竖向循环加载装置,通过室内模型试验研究竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性和桩周土体变形机制。根据试验结果,桩体累积位移可以划分为不发展区域、渐变发展区域、破坏区域3种区域;滞回曲线的滞回圈包络面积随着循环次数的增加,呈现逐渐减小的趋势,滞回曲线由不闭合发展为闭合曲线,桩周土体由弹塑性变形逐渐转变为弹性变形。采用粒子图像测速(particle image velocimetry,简称PIV)技术对循环荷载作用下桩周土体变形进行实时量测,得到桩周土体完整的位移场和剪切应变场。结果表明:循环周期、幅值和密实度为桩周土体变形的主要影响因素,随着循环周期的增加,剪切破坏带在接近土体表面处呈现内敛趋势,剪切破坏面最终近乎平行于桩−土界面。循环荷载幅值越大,表层土体在循环荷载作用下越趋于密实,侧向土压力增大,位移影响区域减小,对应剪切应变场呈现“耳”状分布,幅值比循环周期更容易导致桩周土体出现沉陷。不同砂土密实度中的桩体累积位移随着循环周期呈现出不同的特征,松砂状态下桩周土体位移场呈现倒截锥形,密砂则呈现圆柱形。

关键词: 竖向循环荷载, 桩基础, 土体变形, 粒子图像测速(PIV)

Abstract: The vertical cyclic loading device designed in-house was used to study the bearing characteristics of monopiles in sand and the deformation mechanism of the soil around the pile by laboratory model tests. According to the test results, the cumulative settlement of the pile can be divided into three regions: the non-developing region, the gradually developing region and the damaging region; the envelope area of the hysteresis loop of the hysteresis curve shows a trend of gradual decrease with the increase of the number of cycles, the hysteresis curve develops from non-closed to closed curve, and the deformation of soil around the pile gradually changes from elastic-plastic deformation to elastic deformation. The particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique is used to measure the soil deformation around the pile in real-time under the cyclic load, and the complete displacement field and shear strain field of the soil around the pile are obtained. The results show that the cyclic period, amplitude, and compactness are the main factors influencing the soil deformation around the pile. The shear damage zone shows an inward trend close to the soil surface, and the sheer damage surface is nearly parallel to the pile-soil interface as the increase of the cyclic period. The larger the cyclic load amplitude is, the more the surface soil tends to be compacted under the cyclic load, the lateral earth pressure increases, the displacement influence area decreases, the corresponding shear strain field shows an “ear” distribution, and the amplitude is more likely to cause the soil around the pile to sink than the cyclic period. The cumulative settlement of the pile in different densities of sands shows different characteristics with cyclic period. The displacement field of the soil around the pile shows an inverted truncated cone in loose sand, while dense sand shows a cylindrical shape.

Key words: vertical cyclic load, pile foundation, soil deformation, particle image velocimetry (PIV)

中图分类号: 

  • TU441
[1] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[2] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[3] 闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
[4] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[5] 彭文哲, 赵明华, 杨超炜, 赵衡, . 斜坡桩水平循环特性模型试验及有限杆单元解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 381-391.
[6] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[7] 谭飞, 林大伟, 焦玉勇, 于锦. 钢护筒涂层减阻桩隔离层试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 229-236.
[8] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[9] 景立平, 吴凡, 李嘉瑞, 汪刚, 齐文浩, 周中一, . 土−桩基−隔震支座−核岛地震反应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2483-2492.
[10] 柴源, 牛勇, 吕海波, . 水泥胶结钙质砂地层中单桩竖向承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2203-2212.
[11] 朱鸿鹄, 高宇新, 李元海, 倪钰菲, . 土工格栅加筋砂土中水平锚板抗拔特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1207-1214.
[12] 张聪, 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 关云辉, 陈慧芸, 王振, . 单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1326-1334.
[13] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[14] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[15] 杨军, 孙晓立, 卞德存, 邵继喜, . 基于平行地震波法探测桩基缺陷的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 874-881.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 奎,高 波. 地铁隧道下穿小河和桥梁的施工方案研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1509 -1516 .
[2] 杨 冰,杨 军,常 在,甘厚义,宋二祥. 土石混合体压缩性的三维颗粒力学研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1645 -1650 .
[3] 肖世国,鲜 飞,王唤龙. 一种微型桩组合抗滑结构内力分析方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2553 -2559 .
[4] 叶海林,郑颖人,黄润秋,杜修力,李安洪,许江波. 强度折减动力分析法在滑坡抗滑桩抗震设计中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 317 -323 .
[5] 张志沛,彭 惠,饶 晓. 软土地基注浆扩散过程数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 652 -0655 .
[6] 吴礼舟 ,张利民 ,黄润秋. 成层非饱和土渗流的耦合解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2391 -2396 .
[7] 刘 润 ,王秀妍 ,刘月辉 ,王武刚. 点支撑缺陷下海底埋管热屈曲分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 64 -69 .
[8] 梁耀哲. 刚性桩复合地基的主动土压力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 25 -29 .
[9] 韩建新 ,李术才 ,李树忱 ,杨为民 ,汪 雷 . 基于强度参数演化行为的岩石峰后应力-应变关系研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 342 -346 .
[10] 黄 达 ,岑夺丰 ,黄润秋 . 单裂隙砂岩单轴压缩的中等应变率效应颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 535 -545 .