岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2697-2708.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0757CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0757

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同运行模式下能源桩桩土热响应长周期演变规律研究

奚旺1,赵勇1, 2,冯世进1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 同济大学 土木工程防灾减灾全国重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-20 接受日期:2026-03-28 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 赵勇,男,1992年生,博士,博士后,主要从事能源岩土等方面的研究工作。E-mail: 22310183@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:奚旺,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事能源岩土等方面的研究工作。E-mail: xiwangce@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. W2511052,No. 42307207,No. 424B2022);上海市教育委员会科研创新计划(No. 2023ZKZD25);新基石科学基金会科学探索奖。

Long-term thermal responses of energy pile and soil considering different operation modes

XI Wang1, ZHAO Yong1, 2, FENG Shi-jin1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2025-07-20 Accepted:2026-03-28 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (W2511052, 42307207, 424B2022), the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2023ZKZD25) and the New Cornerstone Science Foundation.

摘要: 能源桩是一种兼具建筑承载和地热开发双重功能的建筑节能新技术。不同运行模式与长周期服役对桩体的换热性能与桩周土体热响应有着不可忽视的影响,但现有研究针对不同运行模式下长周期服役能源桩桩土热响应演变规律的系统揭示仍相对较少。基于此问题开展了不同运行模式下饱和软土条件能源桩模型试验,建立了能源桩热水力数值模型,并结合试验结果进行了模型验证,着重分析了不同运行模式下长周期服役与大气温度对能源桩热响应与土体热影响范围的作用。研究结果表明:在短周期试验中,热恢复期越长同一热循环结束后其换热功率相对越高,桩温呈现中部升温剧烈两端升温柔和的现象,大气温度对于土体上层温度有着显著影响,桩基热影响范围逐渐呈纺锤形外扩。在长周期模拟中,不同运行模式间换热功率差异比例随时间增大,最高可达60%。最大桩基温差始终维持在3 ℃左右,桩周土温波动相对较为柔和。循环初期热影响半径随深度线性增加到一定值后趋于稳定,后期随深度线性不断扩大。循环中热恢复期越长,热影响半径相对越小,但长期运行后各模式间热影响半径差异逐渐缩小。

关键词: 能源桩, 模型试验, 运行模式, 长周期热响应, 桩基热影响半径

Abstract: Energy piles are an innovative building energy-saving technology that serves the dual purposes of structural load-bearing and geothermal energy exploitation. The impact of different operational modes and long-term service on the heat transfer performance of the pile and the thermal response of the surrounding soil cannot be overlooked. However, there is a relative scarcity of systematic research on the evolution patterns of thermal responses between piles and soil under long-term service across various operational modes. Addressing this gap, model tests of energy piles in saturated soft soil conditions were carried out under different operational modes. A hydrothermal numerical model for energy piles was developed and validated against experimental findings. The study primarily focused on examining the effects of long-term service and atmospheric temperature on the thermal response of energy piles and the extent of thermal influence on the soil under different operational modes. The results reveal that in short-cycle tests, a longer thermal recovery period corresponds to a higher heat transfer power upon completion of the same thermal cycle. The pile temperature demonstrates a pattern where the central section heats up sharply, while the ends experience a milder temperature rise. Atmospheric temperature exerts a notable influence on the temperature of the upper soil layer, and the thermal influence range of the pile foundation progressively expands in a spindle-like manner. During long-cycle simulations, the proportional disparity in heat exchange powers among various operational modes progressively widens over time, peaking at up to 60%. The maximum temperature differential within the pile foundation consistently hovers around 3 ℃, with relatively gentle fluctuations in the surrounding soil temperature. In the initial phase of the cycle, the thermal influence radius increases linearly with depth until it reaches a certain value and then stabilizes; in subsequent phases, it continues to expand linearly with depth. A longer thermal recovery period within the cycle correlates with a relatively smaller thermal influence radius. Nevertheless, over extended operational periods, the discrepancies in thermal influence radii among different modes gradually diminish.

Key words: energy pile, model test, operation mode, long-term thermal responses, thermal impact range of pile foundation

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 冯双喜, 卜天浩, 雷华阳, 邢道润, 张国庆, 李建楷. 真空预压-辐射式电渗方法处理污染淤泥脱水与重金属Cu剔除机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2653-2664.
[2] 曹一凡, 黄强兵, 余根荣, 余岱金, 朱媛媛, 于超. 降雨与堆载作用下堆积体滑坡失稳机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2748-2760.
[3] 孟宇涵, 郑秀坤, 王慧, 徐鹏, 李婷, 杨广庆, 张君, 刘林贵. 地震作用方向对多级加筋边坡水平加速度响应特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2360-2366.
[4] 李玉涛, 周汉, 李丽华, 李泽升, 刘瑛, 李林林. 土工合成材料加筋边坡抗水力冲刷特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2028-2040.
[5] 杨瑞, 干飞, 王寿红, 郑刚, 李美霖, 王宏, 毕靖, 吴立城, 刘彪, 张元胤. 卸荷桩板挡墙力学性能及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1672-1685.
[6] 李世豪, 刘杰, 王锋, 雷兵兵, 王斌. 冻融循环下土工格室加筋土挡墙水热力响应机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1713-1727.
[7] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[8] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[9] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[10] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[11] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[12] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[13] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[14] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[15] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!