岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 561-569.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1296

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

空隙特征对砂岩水致劣化规律的影响

许宝田1,张莉萍2,燕晓莹1,邱德俊2   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210046;2. 南京市水利规划设计院股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210000
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-18 出版日期:2019-02-11 发布日期:2019-02-14
  • 作者简介:许宝田,男,1976年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡稳定性分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省水利科技项目(No. 2016054);江苏省社会发展面上项目(No. BE2015675)。

Effect of void characteristics on deteriorating rules of sandstone due to water

XU Bao-tian1, ZHANG Li-ping2, YAN Xiao-ying1, QIU De-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210046, China; 2. Nanjing Water Planning and Designing Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
  • Received:2017-08-18 Online:2019-02-11 Published:2019-02-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Water Conservancy Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province (2016054) and the Social Development Project of Jiangsu Province (BE2015675).

摘要: 针对南京秦淮东河开挖后的稳定性问题,选取黄马青组(T2h)砂岩为研究对象,对砂岩在吸水-干燥循环条件下的单轴抗压、抗拉特性进行试验研究。考虑到未来边坡运营过程中水的影响,试验时分别考虑自然吸水和饱和吸水两种情况。根据试验结果对所研究砂岩的空隙特征、水致劣化特征和劣化机制进行了详细分析。随着吸水-干燥循环次数增加,岩石的抗压、抗拉强度和凝聚力均呈劣化趋势,说明循环次数的增加对岩石的损伤有累积作用。岩石自然吸水条件下(小开空隙未进水时)强度和弹性模量下降速度较慢,而饱和吸水条件下(开空隙被水充满时)强度和弹性模量下降速度较快,表明岩石中小开空隙对岩石的劣化效果显著。微观结构分析结果表明,随着吸水-干燥循环次数增加,岩石中空隙率增大。结合抗剪强度特征分析认为,干-湿循环导致岩石的黏结强度不断下降,而摩擦强度变化较小,表明黏结强度劣化是岩石水致劣化的主要原因,干-湿循环导致水-岩反应,岩石颗粒胶结物发生松散,边缘发生开裂,宏观上表现为岩石劣化。该研究成果对于新开挖河道边坡稳定性分析具有较大的参考价值,为河岸边坡的长期稳定性分析提供了依据。

关键词: 砂岩, 水致劣化, 试验, 空隙特征, 自然吸水, 饱和吸水, 吸水-干燥循环

Abstract: In this paper, the sandstones of the Huangmaqing Group (T2h) were taken as the study object. The compressive and tensile tests were carried out on the rock samples, considering the influencing factors of the slope along the Qinhuai East River in Nanjing city. Since water is the main factor that affects the stability of the excavated slope, both the natural and saturated soaking-drying cycles were taken into account during the experiments. Based on the experimental results of the sandstones, the void and deterioration characteristics and deteriorating mechanism were analyzed in detail. With the increasing number of the soaking-drying cycle, the compressive and tensile strengths, and the cohesion of the sand rock samples all gradually deteriorate. The more the cycle numbers, the more serious damage of the rock mass, which indicates that the cycles have cumulative damage on the samples. Under the natural water absorption conditions (no water entering the small open voids), the strength and modulus of the rock slowly decrease. However, under the saturated water absorption conditions (the small open voids are filled with water), the strength and modulus rapidly decrease, which indicates that the deterioration effect due to existence of the small open voids is obvious. The micro-structures indicate that the voids in the rock increase with the number of soaking-drying cycle. Combined with the shear strength characteristics results, the declination of the cohesive strength is the main factor of rock strength deterioration, and the frictional strength almost has no change. The cycles lead to the water-rock reaction, causing gradual loss of rock particle cementation and cracking of the edges, and the rock is degraded in macroscopic scale. Research results have an important reference for the study of stability of new excavation slope, and provide favorable evidences for the long-term stability analysis of river bank slopes.

Key words: sandstone, deterioration due to water, test, void characteristic, natural water absorption, saturated water absorption, soaking-drying cycle

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[2] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[3] 邹维列, 樊科伟, 张攀, 韩仲, . 土工泡沫减压膨胀土挡墙侧向压力及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2537-2544.
[4] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[5] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[6] 齐添, 孔剑捷, 刘飞禹. 循环剪切对格栅−土石混合体界面特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2593-2602.
[7] 傅翔, 黄平, 谢强, 班宇鑫, 苏焓. 不同高孔隙水压砂岩三轴压缩力学特性及多向破裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2611-2618.
[8] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[9] 刘欣, 沈宇鹏, 刘志坚, 王炳禄, 刘越, 韩昀希. 地下水流速对地铁联络通道冻结壁形成过程影响的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2667-2678.
[10] 贾宝新, 周志扬, 苑文雅, 张晶. 基于等效质点峰值振动速度的高铁线路周边建筑结构振动评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2696-2706.
[11] 周建, 尚肖楠, 刘福深, 沈君逸, 廖星川, . 利用近场动力学方法模拟隧道掘进机滚刀三维贯入破岩[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2732-2743.
[12] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[13] 谢康, 苏谦, 陈晓斌, 刘宝, 王武斌, 王迅, 邓志兴, . 无砟轨道聚氨酯碎石防水联结层单元模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2308-2317.
[14] 卢钦武, 关振长, 林林, 吴淑婧, 宋德杰. 基于静力推覆试验的山岭隧道衬砌-地层相互作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2318-2326.
[15] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 奎,高 波. 地铁隧道下穿小河和桥梁的施工方案研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1509 -1516 .
[2] 杨 冰,杨 军,常 在,甘厚义,宋二祥. 土石混合体压缩性的三维颗粒力学研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1645 -1650 .
[3] 肖世国,鲜 飞,王唤龙. 一种微型桩组合抗滑结构内力分析方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2553 -2559 .
[4] 叶海林,郑颖人,黄润秋,杜修力,李安洪,许江波. 强度折减动力分析法在滑坡抗滑桩抗震设计中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 317 -323 .
[5] 张志沛,彭 惠,饶 晓. 软土地基注浆扩散过程数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 652 -0655 .
[6] 吴礼舟 ,张利民 ,黄润秋. 成层非饱和土渗流的耦合解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2391 -2396 .
[7] 刘 润 ,王秀妍 ,刘月辉 ,王武刚. 点支撑缺陷下海底埋管热屈曲分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 64 -69 .
[8] 梁耀哲. 刚性桩复合地基的主动土压力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 25 -29 .
[9] 韩建新 ,李术才 ,李树忱 ,杨为民 ,汪 雷 . 基于强度参数演化行为的岩石峰后应力-应变关系研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 342 -346 .
[10] 黄 达 ,岑夺丰 ,黄润秋 . 单裂隙砂岩单轴压缩的中等应变率效应颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 535 -545 .