软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0719

岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 626-639.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0719

软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究

Muhammad Usman Azhar^{1, 2}，周辉^{1, 2}，杨凡杰^{1, 2}，高阳^{1, 2}，朱勇^{1, 2}，路新景³，房后国³，耿轶君³

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学和工程国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049； 3. 黄河工程咨询有限公司，河南郑州 450003

收稿日期:2019-05-26 修回日期:2022-09-18 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
作者简介:Muhammad Usman Azhar，男，1985年生，博士，主要从事深部隧道支护设计和数值分析等方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（No.2019YFC0605103）；国家自然科学基金（No.U1865203）；湖北省自然科学基金创新团队（No.2018CFA013）。

Stability of a water diversion tunnel in weak sandstone stratum

Muhammad Usman Azhar^{1, 2}, ZHOU Hui^{1, 2}, YANG Fan-jie^{1, 2}, GAO Yang^{1, 2}, ZHU Yong^{1, 2}, LU Xin-jing³, FANG Hou-guo³, GENG Yi-jun³

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China

Received:2019-05-26 Revised:2022-09-18 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC0605103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1865203) and the Innovation Group of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFA013).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 泥质砂岩属于黏土岩，具有典型的遇水软化特征。在泥质砂岩富水地层中进行隧道开挖是地下工程的一个挑战性问题。研究了围岩软化与未软化条件下泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞的稳定性和支护时间。首先，介绍了泥质砂岩遇水软化的力学试验结果；然后，采用基于Hoek-Brown强度准则的岩体参数评价方法，评估泥质砂岩在围岩软化与未软化条件下的力学参数；再后，以兰州水源地引水隧洞为依托工程，采用数值模拟方法对泥质砂岩隧洞软化与未软化工况的围岩稳定性进行了计算分析，得出泥质砂岩遇水软化对隧洞安全性存在显著影响；最后，采用位移收敛法，研究了泥质砂岩软化与未软化工况中，保障隧洞施工安全的合理支护时机。研究表明，泥质砂岩未软化工况中，可考虑隧道围岩初期支护在距掌子面4～5 m位置实施；而在泥质砂岩遇水软化工况中，初期支护建议在掌子面开挖后立刻支护。研究成果可为泥质砂岩地层隧洞的安全施工提供依据。

关键词: 泥质砂岩, 遇水软化, 隧洞稳定性, 数值分析, 收敛约束法, 支护时机

Abstract: Argillaceous sandstone shows the typical characteristics of water-weakening due to the high content of clays. Tunnelling in argillaceous sandstone stratum with rich (trapped) water is a challenging issue for underground engineering. This study examined the stability and supporting time for a water conveyance tunnel in the argillaceous sandstone stratum with weakened and un-weakened conditions. Firstly, the water-weakened mechanical test results of argillaceous sandstone were presented. Then, to evaluate the mechanical parameters of the argillaceous sandstone in both water-weakening and un-weakening conditions, the rock mass evaluation method on basis of the Hoek-Brown strength criterion was adopted. Next, Lanzhou water source tunnel project was taken as the research object, and the stability of surrounding rock mass for the tunnel in argillaceous sandstone in both conditions was analyzed by a numerical modelling method. The researches indicate that the water-weakening of argillaceous sandstone significantly influenced tunnel safety. Finally, the convergence confinement approach was utilized to analyze the necessary supporting time to ensure tunnel safety during construction. The results indicate that if the argillaceous sandstone does not weaken, early support measures for the tunnel surrounding rock mass can be considered at the distance of 4 to 5 meters away from the excavation face. However, in the case of argillaceous sandstone water-weakening, early support measures should be employed immediately when the tunnel face is excavated. The research findings can provide the foundation for the safe construction of tunnels in a weak surrounding rock mass with water-weakened conditions.

Key words: argillaceous sandstone, water-weakening, tunnel stability, numerical analysis, the convergence confinement method, support timing

中图分类号:

TU457

Muhammad Usman Azhar, 周辉, 杨凡杰, 高阳, 朱勇, 路新景, 房后国, 耿轶君, . 软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 626-639.

Muhammad Usman Azhar, ZHOU Hui, YANG Fan-jie, GAO Yang, ZHU Yong, LU Xin-jing, FANG Hou-guo, GENG Yi-jun, . Stability of a water diversion tunnel in weak sandstone stratum[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 626-639.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	周辉, 宋明, 张传庆, 杨凡杰, 路新景, 房后国, 邓伟杰, . 三轴应力下水对泥质砂岩力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2391-2398.
[2]	李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[3]	乔亚飞, 唐洁, 顾贇, 丁文其, . 超深地连墙槽壁侧压力演变模式及其施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1083-1092.
[4]	汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[5]	蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[6]	张建聪, 江权, 郝宪杰, 丰光亮, 李邵军, 汪志林, 樊启祥, . 高应力下柱状节理玄武岩应力−结构型塌方机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2556-2568.
[7]	庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[8]	高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[9]	盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[10]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[11]	李宁, 杨敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[12]	郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[13]	谢凯楠, 姜德义, 孙中光, 宋中强, 王静怡, 杨涛, 蒋翔, . 基于低场核磁共振的干湿循环对泥质砂岩微观结构劣化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 653-659.
[14]	王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[15]	陈子全，何川，董唯杰，马杲宇，潘旭勇，裴成元,. 北疆侏罗系与白垩系泥质砂岩物理力学特性对比分析及其能量损伤演化机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2873-2885.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究

Stability of a water diversion tunnel in weak sandstone stratum

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10