岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 565-573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0980

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地层基坑开挖扰动及土体再压缩变形研究

鲁泰山1, 2,刘松玉1, 2,蔡国军1, 2,吴恺1, 2,夏文俊3   

  1. 1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189;2. 东南大学 江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室,江苏 南京 211189; 3. 江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏 南京 210004
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-09 修回日期:2020-11-14 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基处理及原位测试等方面的研究。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn E-mail:230189653@ seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:鲁泰山,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事原位测试方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41972269);江苏省交通工程建设局科技项目(No. CX-2019GC02)。

Study on the disturbance and recompression settlement of soft soil induced by foundation excavation

LU Tai-shan1, 2, LIU Song-yu1, 2, CAI Guo-jun1, 2, WU Kai1, 2, XIA Wen-jun3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 3. Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Engineering and Construction Bureau, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, China
  • Received:2020-07-09 Revised:2020-11-14 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972269) and the Project of Jiangsu Provincal Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau (CX-2019GC02).

摘要: 软土地层基坑开挖会对坑底土体产生严重扰动,受开挖扰动影响,坑底土体应力状态和力学性质将发生变化。因此,正确评价开挖扰动程度及扰动对土体工程性质的影响十分重要。通过对现有施工扰动评价方法的总结,以太湖隧道基坑工程为例,采用有限元模拟方法研究了不同开挖深度下坑底中心土体扰动度分布规律及强扰动区深度。进一步,以不排水抗剪强度为评价指标,建立了基于孔压静力触探(CPTU)锥尖阻力的黏性土开挖扰动评价方法,并与有限元扰动评价结果进行了对比,取得了较为一致的结果。最后,采用考虑土体扰动的沉降计算方法,结合有限元扰动度计算结果,对不同基底附加应力下坑底扰动土体的沉降变形进行了计算。计算结果表明,扰动会显著增加地基沉降量,当基底附加应力从100 kPa增加至150 kPa时,考虑土体扰动的地基沉降量与不考虑土体扰动的地基沉降量比值将从1.43增加至2.24。

关键词: 软土, 基坑开挖, 扰动, 孔压静力触探, 沉降

Abstract: The deep excavation of foundation pit in soft soil layer will cause serious disturbance to the soil at the bottom of the pit. Affected by excavation disturbance, the mechanical properties and stress state of the soil at the bottom of the pit will change. Hence, it is important to accurately evaluate the degree of soil disturbance caused by excavation and the influence of disturbance on soil mechanical properties. Based on the summary of the existing evaluation methods of soil disturbance, taking the foundation pit excavation of Taihu tunnel as an example, the distribution of disturbance degree and the depth of strong disturbed zone of soil under the center of the pit bottom under different excavation depths were studied by using the finite element simulation method. Then, taking the undrained shear strength as an evaluation index, a method for evaluating excavation disturbance of clayey soil based on the cone tip resistance in the piezocone penetration test (CPTU) was established. The soil disturbance calculated through cone tip resistance was agreeable with that determined by numerical calculation. Finally, combined with the soil disturbance determined by the finite element method, the settlement of disturbed soil at the bottom of the pit under different base additional stresses was calculated considering the settlement of soil disturbance. The results showed that the soil disturbance would cause a significant increase in the base settlement. When the base additional stress increased from 100 kPa to 150 kPa, the ratio of base settlement with soil disturbance to that without soil disturbance would increase from 1.43 to 2.24.

Key words: soft soil, excavation, disturbance, piezocone penetration test, settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 傅鹤林, 安鹏涛, 李凯, 成国文, 李鲒, 余小辉, . 围岩非均质性对隧道突涌水的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1519-1528.
[2] 郭明伟, 马欢, 杨忠明, 王斌, 董学超, 王水林, . 常泰长江大桥施工阶段大型沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1705-1712.
[3] 向伏林, 杨天亮, 顾凯, 施斌, 刘春, 刘苏平, 张诚成, 姜月华, . 钻孔全断面分布式光纤监测中光缆-土体变形协调性的离散元数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1743-1754.
[4] 孙增春, 郭浩天, 刘汉龙, 吴焕然, 肖杨, . 基于扰动状态概念的饱和黏土热弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1325-1334.
[5] 戴轩, 郭旺, 程雪松, 霍海峰, 刘国光, . 盾构隧道平行侧穿诱发的建筑纵向沉降 实测与模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 233-244.
[6] 陈盛原, 叶华洋, 张伟锋, 韦未, . 路堤荷载作用下柔性桩复合地基的沉降分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3077-3086.
[7] 侯公羽, 李子祥, 胡涛, 周天赐, 肖海林, 王凯迪, 胡锦欣, 朱景, . 基于分布式光纤应变传感技术的隧道 沉降监测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3148-3158.
[8] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 高鲁超, 龚维明, . 大直径后压浆灌注桩承载力和沉降的 实用计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2746-2755.
[9] 岳建勇. 地铁交通引起的建筑物振动实测与数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2756-2764.
[10] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[11] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[12] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[13] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[14] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[15] 徐进, 王少伟, 杨伟涛. 水位变化下可压缩土层的黏弹性耦合变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1065-1073.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[6] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .
[7] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[8] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[9] 陈 松,徐光黎,陈国金,吴雪婷. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡滑带工程地质特征研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3048 -3052 .
[10] 杨 坤,周创兵,王同旭. 多种外界随机荷载综合作用下的坝坡风险评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3057 -3062 .