岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 954-962.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1191

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于拉拔试验和离散元模拟的单、双层土工 格栅加固道砟的研究

陈成,段永达,芮瑞,汪伦   

  1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-12 修回日期:2020-10-13 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 芮瑞,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程加固设计与理论方面的研究。E-mail: r.rui@whut.edu.cn E-mail:chengchen87@whut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈成,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事道砟颗粒材料力学特性及离散元数值模拟研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51708438);中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 2018IVB029)

Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method

CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708438) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018IVB029).

摘要: 工程中运用土工格栅加固道床,以通过增强水平约束来减少道砟层竖向累积沉降和侧向位移。为深入研究土工格栅对道砟的加固机制,采用自制多层格栅拉拔设备,在静荷载下进行了大、小孔径土工格栅的单、双层铺设抗拔试验,分析了格栅孔径、铺设深度及层数对拉拔阻力的影响。通过单层铺设得到不同深度的拉拔阻力标准值,提出了双层加固效应系数?,量化了双层铺设加固能力并探讨了最佳铺设方式。通过离散元方法模拟了65 mm孔径格栅双层铺设于200~300 mm的工况,从细观角度分析拉拔过程中双层格栅加筋道砟内部应力链的和法向接触力矢量的分布情况。结果表明:对于现行规范的级配道砟,65 mm孔径格栅加固能力优于32 mm孔径格栅;双层铺设时的极限拉拔阻力均不同程度地大于单层铺设时两层的拉拔阻力标准值之和,双层加固效应的发挥与格栅孔径及双层间距有一定的联系。模拟结果也验证了在拉拔过程中,双层格栅之间形成加固效应的叠加,法向接触力矢量分布情况表明双层格栅存在联锁加固效应。

关键词: 道砟, 土工格栅, 拉拔试验, 双层加固, 加固效应系数, 离散元方法

Abstract: Geogrid is used to reinforce the trackbed by increasing the confining pressure and reducing the vertical cumulative settlement and lateral displacement of ballast. In order to further study the reinforcement mechanism of geogrid reinforced ballast, pull-out tests of single and double-layer geogrids with large and small apertures under static load were carried out by using self-designed equipment, and the influences of grid aperture, reinforcement depth and number of layers on pull-out resistance were analyzed. The standard values of pull-out resistance at different depths were obtained by single-layer tests, and the coefficient of double-layer reinforcement was proposed to quantify the reinforcement capacity of double-layer geogrids, and the best laying way was also discussed. Double-layer geogrids with aperture size of 65 mm placed in 200-300 mm were simulated by DEM. The distribution of internal stress chain and contact force vector of geogrid reinforced ballast during pull-out process were analyzed from the micro view. The results show that, for the graded ballast, the geogrid with 65 mm aperture performed better than that with 32 mm aperture; the ultimate pullout resistance of double-layer laying was greater than the sum of the standard values of the two-layer laying. The double-layer reinforcement effect is related to the geogrid aperture and the layer spacing. The simulation results also verified the superposition of reinforcement effect between the two-layer geogrids during pull-out process, and the distribution of normal contact force vector showed that the double-layer geogrid had interlocking reinforcement effect.

Key words: ballast, geogrid, pull-out test, double-layer reinforcement, reinforcement effect coefficient, DEM

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 冯忠居, 江冠, 赵瑞欣, 龙厚胜, 王政斌, 张正旭, . 基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[2] 洪成雨, 杨强, 赵勇, 陈登伟, 喻伟. 基于光纤传感技术的土工格栅应变监测机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1755-1764.
[3] 陈晓斌, 杨宁宇, 朱禹, 张俊麒, 乔世范, . 轮胎衍生骨料级配碎石混合料应力−应变关系 大型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 921-931.
[4] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[5] 徐东升, 黄明, 黄佛光, 陈成. 不同级配珊瑚砂水泥胶结体的破坏行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[6] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[7] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[8] 刘方成, 吴孟桃, 杨 峻, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶砂强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[9] 高俊丽, 徐宏飞, 曹威, 袁川. 加肋土工膜与砂土拉拔试验及界面细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4668-4674.
[10] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[11] 王家全, 徐良杰, 黄世斌, 刘政权. 动载下土工格栅加筋桥台挡墙承载性能分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
[12] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[13] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[14] 赵象卓,张宏伟,CAO Chen,张 明,张怀东,韩 军, . 不同围岩条件下锚杆肋间距与锚固力优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[15] 王家全,张亮亮,刘政权,周圆兀. 土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[2] 胡大伟,周 辉,谢守益,张 凯,邵建富,冯夏庭. 大理岩破坏阶段Biot系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3727 -3732 .
[3] 师旭超,韩 阳. 卸荷作用下软黏土回弹吸水试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 732 -736 .
[4] 原喜忠,李 宁,赵秀云,杨银涛. 东北多年冻土地区地基承载力对气候变化敏感性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3265 -3272 .
[5] 白 冰,李小春,石 露,唐礼忠. 弹塑性应力-应变曲线的斜率恒等式及其验证和应用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3789 -3792 .
[6] 唐利民. 地基沉降预测模型的正则化算法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3945 -3948 .
[7] 蔡辉腾,危福泉,蔡宗文. 重庆主城区粉质黏土动力特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 224 -228 .
[8] 宋 玲 ,刘奉银 ,李 宁 . 旋压入土式静力触探机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 787 -0792 .
[9] 金解放 ,李夕兵 ,殷志强 ,邹 洋. 循环冲击下波阻抗定义岩石损伤变量的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1385 -1393 .
[10] 周延军 ,耿应春 ,王贵宾 ,唐洪林 ,李祖奎. 深部地层岩石力学性质测试与分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1625 -1630 .