岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1587-1600.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1861

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于统一强度理论的临坡加筋地基极限承载力新解

晏青,赵均海,张常光   

  1. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-12 修回日期:2021-04-08 出版日期:2021-06-11 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 张常光,男,1982年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: zcg1016@163.com E-mail:yanqing1210@126.com
  • 作者简介:晏青,女,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程强度理论与应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51878056);陕西省科技计划-社会发展领域项目(No.2019SF-256);地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金(No.SKLGP2020K022);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.300102289720)。

A new solution to the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced foundation near slope based on the unified strength theory

YAN Qing, ZHAO Jun-hai, ZHANG Chang-guang   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2020-12-12 Revised:2021-04-08 Online:2021-06-11 Published:2021-06-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51878056), the Social Development Foundation for Science and Technology Planning Project of Shaanxi Province (2019SF-256), the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP2020K022) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Chang’an University(300102289720).

摘要: 针对加筋地基整体剪切破坏和复合破坏两种模式,在统一强度理论的基础上,考虑中间主应力、筋材层间距、加筋层数和筋材抗拉强度的综合影响,推导了临坡条形基础加筋地基的极限承载力新解,并给出了应用步骤。通过与其他方法的对比,讨论了该方法的有效性和参数影响特性。研究结果表明:所得极限承载力解答与文献模型试验结果吻合良好,具有广泛的适用性;随着中间主应力效应的增加,整体剪切破坏和复合破坏下临坡加筋地基极限承载力均明显增大;随着筋材层间距的增加,整体剪切破坏下临坡加筋地基极限承载力先增大后减小,而复合破坏下逐渐减小;整体剪切破坏下加筋层数的影响分为3个阶段,复合破坏下分为2个阶段;同时,筋材抗拉强度的影响不可忽略。该研究结果可为临坡加筋地基的优化设计提供有益的参考。

关键词: 临坡加筋地基, 极限承载力, 统一强度理论, 整体剪切破坏, 复合破坏

Abstract: In view of two modes of general shear failure and composite failure of reinforced foundation, a new solution to the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings resting on reinforced foundations near slope was derived based on the unified strength theory and the application procedures were given. Effects of the intermediate principal stress, the vertical spacing between reinforcement layers, the number of reinforcement layers, and the tensile strength of reinforcements were comprehensively taken into consideration in the new solution. Compared with other methods, the effectiveness and parameter influence characteristics of the proposed method were discussed. The results showed that the obtained solution to the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced foundation agreed well with the results of model tests reported in the literature, and it had wide applicability. With the increase of the effect of intermediate principal stress, the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced foundation near slope subjected to general shear failure and composite failure increased markedly. As the vertical spacing between reinforcement layers increased, the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced foundation near slope increased first and then decreased under the general shear failure, but it would gradually reduce under the composite failure. The influence of the number of reinforced layers under the general shear failure can be divided into three stages, and that under the composite failure can be divided into two stages. Meanwhile, the effect of the tensile strength of reinforcements cannot be ignored. The research results can provide useful references for the optimization design of reinforced foundation near slope.

Key words: reinforced foundation near slope, ultimate bearing capacity, unified strength theory, general shear failure, composite failure

中图分类号: 

  • TU470
[1] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[2] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[3] 冯衡, 高斐略, 刘观仕, 高彬, 肖飞, 曾二贤, . 风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3328-3334.
[4] 张常光, 高本贤, 李天斌, 单冶鹏, . 考虑位移释放的横观各向同性冻胀 寒区隧道冻胀力弹塑性解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2967-2976.
[5] 林志, 胡伟, 赵璞, 陈秋南, 贺建清, 陈洁, 史旦达, . 砂土中平板圆锚倾斜拉拔承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3059-3068.
[6] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[7] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
[8] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[9] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[10] 雷勇, 邓加政, 刘泽宇, 李君杰, 邹根. 考虑荷载位置偏移的空洞岩石地基极限承载力 计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3326-3331.
[11] 王东英, 汤华, 尹小涛, 杨光华, 姜燕, . 基于简化力学模型的隧道锚极限承载力估值公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3405-3414.
[12] 蒋万里, 朱国甫, 张杰, . 单桩承载力的一种直接动测法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3500-3508.
[13] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[14] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[15] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[6] 樊恒辉,高建恩,吴普特,娄宗科. 水泥基土壤固化剂固化土的物理化学作用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3741 -3745 .
[7] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[8] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[9] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[10] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .