基于多钻进参数和概率分类方法的地层识别研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0528

岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1123-1134.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0528

基于多钻进参数和概率分类方法的地层识别研究

梁栋才^{1, 2}，汤华^{1, 2}，吴振君^{1, 2}，张勇慧^{1, 2}，房昱纬^{1, 2}

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-04-10 修回日期:2021-12-07 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-18
通讯作者: 汤华，男，1978年生，博士，研究员，主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究。E-mail: htang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:liangdongcai18@mails.ucas.ac.cn
作者简介:梁栋才，男，1996年生，博士研究生，主要从事基于随钻测试的岩土力学性质研究。
基金资助:
云南省交通运输厅科技计划（云交科教（2020）74号）；云南省交通运输厅科技计划（云交科教（2018）18号）；

Stratum identification based on multiple drilling parameters and probability classification

LIANG Dong-cai^{1, 2}, TANG Hua^{1, 2}, WU Zhen-jun^{1, 2}, ZHANG Yong-hui^{1, 2}, FANG Yu-wei^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-04-10 Revised:2021-12-07 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-18
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Transportation Department (Yunjiao Science and Education (2020) No.74) and the Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Transportation Department (Yunjiao Science and Education (2018) No.18)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 传统的超前钻探地质预报常以某个钻进参数的变化率作为地层识别的主要依据。钻头破岩是一个复杂的力学过程，应考虑多个参数的协同作用，仅采用单钻进参数识别地层的不确定性较大。首先，对超前钻探数据进行预处理，包括标准化、频数分布分析和敏感性分析，筛选出对地层变化敏感的关键钻进参数；其次，基于能量守恒、二元无序逻辑回归分析和多参数变异性分析原理分别建立了破岩能量、逻辑回归概率和地层硬度3种地层识别综合指标；最后，采用基于贝叶斯原理的概率分类方法建立地层识别模型，利用ROC分析方法得到模型参数，实现基于多钻进参数和概率分类方法的地层识别。以地质条件复杂的隧道工程为例，介绍了该地层识别方法的应用，结果表明：3种地层识别综合指标均具有较好的跨孔地层识别能力，识别准确率超过80%；破岩能量和逻辑回归概率指标适用于较近距离的跨孔地层识别，平均识别准确率分别为86.3%和84.1%；逻辑回归概率指标对软弱夹层识别能力较强，准确率达到94.2%；地层硬度指标适用于较远距离的跨孔地层识别；灰岩识别准确率最大达到93.2%。

关键词: 超前钻探, 破岩能量, 逻辑回归概率, 地层硬度指标, 概率分类, 地层识别

Abstract: The traditional geological prediction method of advanced drilling usually takes the change rate of one specific drilling parameter as the main basis for stratum identification. The rock breaking of drill bit is a complicated mechanical process. Stratum identification with single drilling parameter results in great uncertainty. The cooperative effect of multiple parameters in drilling process should be considered. Firstly, the advanced drilling data was preprocessed, including standardization, frequency distribution analysis and sensitivity analysis, to select the key drilling parameters sensitive to stratum changes. Secondly, based on the principles of energy conservation, binary disordered logistic regression analysis and multi-parameter variability analysis, three comprehensive identification indexes of rock breaking energy, logistic regression probability and stratum hardness index were established respectively. Finally, a stratum identification model was established by probability classification method based on Bayesian principle, and the model parameters were obtained by ROC analysis method, and the stratum identification based on multiple drilling parameters and probability classification method was realized. Taking the tunnel project with complex geological conditions as an example, the application of the proposed stratum identification method is introduced. The results show that: Three comprehensive indexes have great performance in cross-hole stratum identification, and the identification accuracy exceeds 80%. The rock breaking energy and the logic regression probability are suitable for the cross-hole stratum identification with short distance, and the average identification accuracies are 86.3% and 84.1%, respectively. The logical regression probability index has strong identification capability for the weak interlayer, and the identification accuracy reaches 94.2%. The stratum hardness index is suitable for the cross-hole stratum identification with long distance, and the maximum identification accuracy of limestone is 93.2%.

Key words: advanced drilling, rock breaking energy, logistic regression probability, stratum hardness index, probability classification, stratum identification

中图分类号:

TU 45

梁栋才, 汤华, 吴振君, 张勇慧, 房昱纬, . 基于多钻进参数和概率分类方法的地层识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1123-1134.

LIANG Dong-cai, TANG Hua, WU Zhen-jun, ZHANG Yong-hui, FANG Yu-wei, . Stratum identification based on multiple drilling parameters and probability classification[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1123-1134.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	周福川, 唐红梅, 王林峰. 缓倾角塔柱状危岩压裂损伤-突变失稳预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1341-1352.
[2]	崔臻, 盛谦, 李建贺, 付兴伟, . 蠕滑错断-强震时序作用下跨活断裂隧道变形破坏机制初步研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1364-1373.
[3]	郭明珠, 谷坤生, 张合, 孙海龙, 王晨, 刘晃, . 强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡动力响应规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1306-1316.
[4]	唐旭海, 许婧璟, 张怡恒, 何琦, 王正直, 张国平, 刘泉声, . 基于微观岩石力学试验和NWA13618陨石的小行星岩石力学参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1157-1163.
[5]	彭守建, 张倩文, 许江, 陈奕安, 陈灿灿, 曹琦, 饶豪魁, . 基于三维数字图像相关技术的砂岩渗流-应力耦合变形局部化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1197-1206.
[6]	杨豪, 魏玉峰, 裴向军, 张御阳, . 含陡缓倾结构面反倾岩坡折断面演化特征的离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1215-1225.
[7]	范杰, 朱星, 胡桔维, 唐垚, 贺春蕾, . 基于3D-DIC的砂岩裂纹扩展及损伤监测试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1009-1019.
[8]	姜玥, 周辉, 卢景景, 高阳, . 空心圆柱砂岩真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 932-944.
[9]	戴北冰, 李天齐, 杨峻, 刘锋涛, . 组构对自然休止角影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 957-968.
[10]	侯奎奎, 吴钦正, 张凤鹏, 彭超, 刘焕新, 刘兴全, . 不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m 竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1104.
[11]	赵宏刚, 张东明, 蒋长宝, 余北辰, . 考虑软弱夹层厚度的岩体力学响应及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 969-980.
[12]	肖建成, 周辉, 卢景景, 冯春, 徐福通, . 双轮铣槽机铣削过程及截齿入岩顺序优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 981-994.
[13]	张强, 王军保, 宋战平, 冯世进, 张玉伟, 曾涛, . 循环荷载作用下盐岩微观结构变化及经验疲劳模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 995-1008.
[14]	汪铁楠, 翟越, 高欢, 李宇白, 李艳, 孙维振, 颜廷韵, . 静力压缩下煤岩组合体的裂前宏观弹性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1031-1040.
[15]	高要辉, 张春生, 苏方声, 邱士利, . 深部硬岩剪切边界下应力诱发片帮的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1103-1111.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于多钻进参数和概率分类方法的地层识别研究

Stratum identification based on multiple drilling parameters and probability classification

PDF (Chinese)

PDF (English)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10