岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1306-1316.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1412

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应规律试验研究

郭明珠1,谷坤生1,张合2,孙海龙1,王晨1,刘晃1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 河北省地震局,河北 石家庄 050001
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-22 修回日期:2022-01-19 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 谷坤生,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩质斜坡动力响应的研究。E-mail: guks@emails.bjut.edu.cn E-mail:gmz@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郭明珠,男,1963年生,博士,教授,从事防灾减灾工程与防护工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发项目(No. 2018YFC1505001)。

Experimental study of dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake

GUO Ming-zhu1, GU Kun-sheng1, ZHANG He2, SUN Hai-long1, WANG Chen1, LIU Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Hebei Provincial Seismological Bureau, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050001, China
  • Received:2021-08-22 Revised:2022-01-19 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFC1505001)

摘要: 青藏高原东南三江流域沿江分布着数以万计的古滑坡和潜在滑坡,对在建的川藏铁路构成严重的威胁。通过振动台模型试验研究了强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡的动力响应规律。分析不同地震动参数、输入波类型和软弱结构面对斜坡动力响应规律的影响。试验结果表明:斜坡的自振频率随着输入地震波次数的增加而逐渐降低,振动强度为0.3g和0.6g是斜坡启裂和失稳的临界动力条件。斜坡具有明显的高程效应,加速度放大系数沿坡表呈现先增加、后减小、再增加的趋势,在1/4坡高和坡顶处较大。坡内竖直向加速度放大系数随高程增加呈现线性增加的趋势。频率对斜坡动力放大响应影响较大。斜坡对低频地震波的放大效应不明显,甚至有抑制作用。随着频率的增加,斜坡的动力放大效应越来越明显。随着幅值的增加,斜坡加速度放大系数呈现先增大后减小的趋势,在振动强度为0.3g~0.4g时达到最大值。不同类型地震波作用下,斜坡对天然波的放大作用高于人工合成波。软弱夹层的存在使输入的地震波出现了明显的放大,并通过快速傅里叶变换(fast Fourier transform,简称FFT)发现,软弱夹层的位置对输入地震波的频段的敏感程度不同。该试验揭示了含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡在强震作用下的动力响应规律,为进一步研究此类斜坡的失稳破坏机制和防治提供了依据。

关键词: 振动台试验, 顺层岩质斜坡, 软弱夹层, 动力响应

Abstract: Tens of thousands of ancient landslides and potential landslides are distributed along the Three-rivers basin in the southeast of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, posing a severe threat to the Sichuan-Tibet railway under construction. A shaking table model test was performed to study the dynamic response of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake. The influences of different ground motion parameters, input wave types, and weak interlayer on slope dynamic response were analysed. The test results show that the natural frequency of the slope decreases gradually with the increase of the number of input seismic waves, and the vibration intensities of 0.3g and 0.6g are the critical dynamic conditions for crack initiation and instability of the slope. There is an obvious elevation effect on the slope, and the acceleration amplification factor increases first, then decreases, finally increases along the slope surface, and is larger at 1/4 of the slope height and the top of the slope. The vertical acceleration amplification factor inside the slope increases linearly with elevation. The frequency has a great impact on the dynamic amplification response of the slope. The slope does not significantly amplify low-frequency seismic waves, and even inhibit them. With the increase of frequency, the dynamic amplification effect of slope becomes more and more prominent. As the amplitude increases, the acceleration amplification factor firstly increases and then decreases, finally reaches the maximum value at the vibration intensities of 0.3g–0.4g. Under the excitation of different types of seismic waves, the amplifying effect of slope on natural waves is higher than that on synthetic waves. The existence of a weak interlayer amplifies the input seismic wave markedly, and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) shows that the sensitivity of positions of the weak interlayer to frequency bands of input seismic waves differs. This experiment reveals the dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake action and provides a basis for further study on the failure mechanism and prevention of slope.

Key words: shaking table test, bedding rock slope, weak interlayer, dynamic response

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458+.4
[1] 郑长杰, 何育泽, 丁选明, 栾鲁宝, 陈业伟, . 下卧基岩黏弹性地基上刚性条形基础 竖向振动响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1434-1440.
[2] 安军海, 陶连金, 蒋录珍, . 盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[3] 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 张聪, 赖德金, 朱继新, 林路宇, . 强震作用下液化场地群桩动力响应及p-y曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1289-1298.
[4] 张聪, 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 关云辉, 陈慧芸, 王振, . 单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1326-1334.
[5] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[6] 赵宏刚, 张东明, 蒋长宝, 余北辰, . 考虑软弱夹层厚度的岩体力学响应及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 969-980.
[7] 赵爽, 余俊, 刘新源, 胡钟伟. 悬臂式刚性墙动力响应解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 152-159.
[8] 何江, 肖世国, . 多级拼装悬臂式挡墙地震永久位移计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1971-1982.
[9] 饶佩森, 李丹, 孟庆山, 王新志, 付金鑫, 雷学文, . 循环荷载作用下钙质砂地基土压力分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1579-1586.
[10] 赖天文, 雷浩, 武志信, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维增强复合材料在高边坡防护中的 振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 390-400.
[11] 冯忠居, 张聪, 何静斌, 董芸秀, 袁枫斌, . 强震作用下嵌岩单桩时程响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3227-3237.
[12] 窦金熙, 张贵金, 张熙, 范伟中, 宋伟, . 砂质土体脉动注浆浆−土耦合动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3315-3327.
[13] 张玲, 欧强, 赵明华, 丁选明, 刘健飞, . 移动荷载下土工加筋路堤动力响应特性数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2865-2874.
[14] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[15] 李福秀, 吴志坚, 严武建, 赵多银, . 基于振动台试验的黄土塬边斜坡 动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .