岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1306-1316.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1412

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应规律试验研究

郭明珠1,谷坤生1,张合2,孙海龙1,王晨1,刘晃1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 河北省地震局,河北 石家庄 050001
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-22 修回日期:2022-01-19 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 谷坤生,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩质斜坡动力响应的研究。E-mail: guks@emails.bjut.edu.cn E-mail:gmz@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郭明珠,男,1963年生,博士,教授,从事防灾减灾工程与防护工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发项目(No. 2018YFC1505001)。

Experimental study of dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake

GUO Ming-zhu1, GU Kun-sheng1, ZHANG He2, SUN Hai-long1, WANG Chen1, LIU Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Hebei Provincial Seismological Bureau, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050001, China
  • Received:2021-08-22 Revised:2022-01-19 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFC1505001)

摘要: 青藏高原东南三江流域沿江分布着数以万计的古滑坡和潜在滑坡,对在建的川藏铁路构成严重的威胁。通过振动台模型试验研究了强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡的动力响应规律。分析不同地震动参数、输入波类型和软弱结构面对斜坡动力响应规律的影响。试验结果表明:斜坡的自振频率随着输入地震波次数的增加而逐渐降低,振动强度为0.3g和0.6g是斜坡启裂和失稳的临界动力条件。斜坡具有明显的高程效应,加速度放大系数沿坡表呈现先增加、后减小、再增加的趋势,在1/4坡高和坡顶处较大。坡内竖直向加速度放大系数随高程增加呈现线性增加的趋势。频率对斜坡动力放大响应影响较大。斜坡对低频地震波的放大效应不明显,甚至有抑制作用。随着频率的增加,斜坡的动力放大效应越来越明显。随着幅值的增加,斜坡加速度放大系数呈现先增大后减小的趋势,在振动强度为0.3g~0.4g时达到最大值。不同类型地震波作用下,斜坡对天然波的放大作用高于人工合成波。软弱夹层的存在使输入的地震波出现了明显的放大,并通过快速傅里叶变换(fast Fourier transform,简称FFT)发现,软弱夹层的位置对输入地震波的频段的敏感程度不同。该试验揭示了含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡在强震作用下的动力响应规律,为进一步研究此类斜坡的失稳破坏机制和防治提供了依据。

关键词: 振动台试验, 顺层岩质斜坡, 软弱夹层, 动力响应

Abstract: Tens of thousands of ancient landslides and potential landslides are distributed along the Three-rivers basin in the southeast of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, posing a severe threat to the Sichuan-Tibet railway under construction. A shaking table model test was performed to study the dynamic response of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake. The influences of different ground motion parameters, input wave types, and weak interlayer on slope dynamic response were analysed. The test results show that the natural frequency of the slope decreases gradually with the increase of the number of input seismic waves, and the vibration intensities of 0.3g and 0.6g are the critical dynamic conditions for crack initiation and instability of the slope. There is an obvious elevation effect on the slope, and the acceleration amplification factor increases first, then decreases, finally increases along the slope surface, and is larger at 1/4 of the slope height and the top of the slope. The vertical acceleration amplification factor inside the slope increases linearly with elevation. The frequency has a great impact on the dynamic amplification response of the slope. The slope does not significantly amplify low-frequency seismic waves, and even inhibit them. With the increase of frequency, the dynamic amplification effect of slope becomes more and more prominent. As the amplitude increases, the acceleration amplification factor firstly increases and then decreases, finally reaches the maximum value at the vibration intensities of 0.3g–0.4g. Under the excitation of different types of seismic waves, the amplifying effect of slope on natural waves is higher than that on synthetic waves. The existence of a weak interlayer amplifies the input seismic wave markedly, and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) shows that the sensitivity of positions of the weak interlayer to frequency bands of input seismic waves differs. This experiment reveals the dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake action and provides a basis for further study on the failure mechanism and prevention of slope.

Key words: shaking table test, bedding rock slope, weak interlayer, dynamic response

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458+.4
[1] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[2] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[3] 曹建军, 胡斌, 王泽祺, 李京, . 基于分数阶积分的软弱夹层蠕变损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[4] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[5] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[6] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[7] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[8] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[9] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[10] 贾科敏, 许成顺, 杜修力, 张小玲, 宋佳, 苏卓林, . 可液化倾斜场地的侧向扩展机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1848.
[11] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[12] 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 陶云翔, 唐跃, 王炳辉, 蔡晓光, 张雷, . 格栅条带式加筋废旧轮胎胎面挡土墙 抗震性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 931-940.
[13] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[14] 刘新荣, 郭雪岩, 许彬, 周小涵, 曾夕, 谢应坤, 王䶮, . 含消落带劣化岩体的危岩边坡动力累积损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 637-648.
[15] 闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐明明,王芝银,马兰平,曾志华,张之沛. 油气管道穿越黄土冲沟的管线设计参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] 李俊才,纪广强,宋桂华,张 琼,王志亮,严小敏. 高层建筑疏桩筏板基础现场实测与分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1018 -1022 .
[3] 魏 宁,李小春,王 燕,谷志孟. 城市垃圾填埋场甲烷资源量与利用前景[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1687 -1692 .
[4] 牛文杰,叶为民,刘绍刚,禹海涛. 考虑饱和-非饱和渗流的土坡极限分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2477 -2482 .
[5] 尹宏磊,徐千军,李仲奎. 膨胀变形对膨胀土边坡稳定性的影响[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2506 -2510 .
[6] 林达明,尚彦军,孙福军,孙元春,吴锋波,刘志强. 岩体强度估算方法研究及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 837 -842 .
[7] 李 辉 ,晏鄂川 ,杨建国 ,吕 坤 . 库水条件下滑坡体与挡墙相互作用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1593 -1600 .
[8] 胡长明 ,梅 源 ,王雪艳 . 离石地区湿陷性黄土地基强夯参数的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2903 -2909 .
[9] 黄志鹏 ,董燕军 ,廖年春 ,尹健民 ,周江平 . 锦屏一级水电站左岸开挖高边坡变形监测分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 235 -242 .
[10] 周小文 , 濮家骝 . 砂土中隧洞开挖引起的地面沉降试验研究[J]. , 2002, 23(5): 559 -563 .