岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2634-2646.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0577

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

氯氧镁水泥固化淤泥力学特性应变速率效应研究

王东星1, 2, 3,陈政光1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-16 修回日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2021-10-11 发布日期:2021-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 陈政光,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事固化材料研发和淤泥处置等环境岩土方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhengguang-chen@whu.edu.cn E-mail:dongxing-wang@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王东星,男,1984年生,博士(后),教授,博士生导师,主要从事淤泥固化、软基处理等环境岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51879202,No. 52079098)

Strain rate effect on mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement solidified sludge

WANG Dong-xing1, 2, 3, CHEN Zheng-guang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2021-04-16 Revised:2021-06-24 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879202, 52079098).

摘要: 对氯氧镁水泥(MOC)固化淤泥进行无侧限压缩与间接拉伸试验,研究养护龄期、延迟压实对试样强度与刚度的影响,分析恒定多应变速率加载和交替应变速率加载下固化淤泥的应变速率效应。结果表明,应变速率增加,纯淤泥的拉压强度、弹性模量、破坏应变与总应变能均随之增加。MOC固化淤泥抗压强度、抗拉强度及其总应变能随应变速率增加呈增加趋势,而弹性模量和破坏应变受应变速率影响较弱。应变速率越快,试样破裂面越扭曲且崎岖不平。养护龄期延长,MOC固化淤泥抗压强度及总压缩应变能显著增加,而抗拉强度及总拉伸应变能略有减少,不同计算方法下龄期对应变速率敏感性的影响不同。延迟压实会折减固化淤泥的拉压强度、弹性模量和总应变能,降低应变速率敏感性。应变速率突变产生的应力跳跃随应力增大而增加,随应变增大先增加后持平。速率敏感性系数结果表明,固化淤泥的速率敏感性低于纯淤泥,劈裂抗拉强度对应变速率变化的敏感性大于无侧限抗压强度。该研究结果可为固化淤泥材料应变速率效应分析提供理论参考。

关键词: 淤泥, 氯氧镁水泥(MOC), 固化, 应变速率

Abstract: Series of unconfined compression and indirect tensile tests were performed to study the effects of curing age and delayed compaction on strength and stiffness of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) solidified sludge, analyzing the strain rate effect of solidified sludge under constant multi-strain rate loading and alternative strain rate loading. The obtained results indicate that the tensile strength, compressive strength, elastic modulus, failure strain, and total strain energy of sludge increase with an increased strain rate. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and total strain energy of MOC solidified sludge has an upward trend with strain rate, while the elastic modulus and failure strain have no apparent change. The faster the strain rate is, the more distorted and rugged the fracture surface is. With the prolongation of curing age, the compressive strength and total compressive strain energy are significantly increased, while the tensile strength and total tensile strain energy are reduced slightly. Significantly, different calculation methods adopted would result in different strain rate sensitivity coefficients for curing age. The delayed compaction would reduce the tensile strength, compressive strength, elastic modulus, total strain energy, and strain rate sensitivity coefficient of solidified sludge. The stress jump induced by a sudden change of strain rate is enlarged owing to the increase of applied stress, and it first increases and then levels off as the strain is extended. The strain rate sensitivity coefficient shows that solidified sludge is less sensitive than pure sludge, and the tensile strength is more sensitive than the compressive strength. The obtained results can provide an essential theoretical reference for the strain rate effect analysis of solidified sludge.

Key words: sludge, magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC), solidification, strain rate

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 周恒宇, 王修山, 胡星星, 熊志奇, 张小元, . 地聚合物固化淤泥强度增长影响因素及机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2089-2098.
[2] 雷华阳, 王鹏, 刘旭, 王磊, . 基于气体运移规律的增压式真空预压法 加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 943-953.
[3] 杨爱武, 徐彩丽, 郎瑞卿, 王韬, . 冻融循环作用下城市污泥固化土三维力学 特性及其破坏准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 963-975.
[4] 杨爱武, 杨少朋, 郎瑞卿, 陈子荷, . 轻质固化盐渍土三维力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 593-600.
[5] 孙宏磊, 陆逸, 潘晓东, 史吏, 蔡袁强, . 真空预压作用下初始含水率 对疏浚淤泥固结影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3029-3040.
[6] 王东星, 陈政光, . 氯氧镁水泥固化淤泥力学特性及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 77-85.
[7] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[8] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[9] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 偏高岭土增强石灰-水泥固化淤泥的耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1146-1152.
[10] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[11] 王东星, 唐弈锴, 伍林峰, . 疏浚淤泥化学絮凝−真空预压深度脱水效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3929-3938.
[12] 李 贤, 汪时机, 何丙辉, 沈泰宇, . 土体适用MICP技术的渗透特性条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2956-2964.
[13] 王东星, 肖杰, 李丽华, 肖衡林, . 基于碳化-固化技术的武汉东湖淤泥 耐久性演变微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3045-3053.
[14] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[15] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[4] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .