岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 528-538.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1255

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

污染场地六价铬迁移转化机制与数值模拟研究

贺勇1, 2，胡广1, 2，张召1, 2，娄伟3，邹艳红1, 2，李星3，张可能1, 2   

  1. 1. 中南大学 有色金属成矿预测与地质环境监测教育部重点实验室，湖南 长沙 410083； 2. 中南大学 地球科学与信息物理学院，湖南 长沙 410083；3. 湖南省和清环境科技有限公司，湖南 长沙 410221
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-08 修回日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-02-11 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 作者简介:贺勇，男，1987年生，博士，副教授，博士生导师，主要从事环境工程地质和非饱和土力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划（No. 2019YFC1805905）；国家自然科学基金（No. 42072318，No. 41972282，No. 41807253）；环境地球化学国家重点实验室开放课题（No. SKLEG2021208）；湖南省自然科学基金（No. 2019JJ50763）；中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（No. 2021zzts0254）。

Numerical simulation on the migration and transformation mechanism of hexavalent chromium in contaminated site

HE Yong1, 2, HU Guang1, 2, ZHANG Zhao1, 2, LOU Wei3, ZOU Yan-hong1, 2, LI Xing3, ZHANG Ke-neng1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 3. Hunan HIKEE Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410221, China
  • Received:2021-08-08 Revised:2021-12-01 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1805905), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072318, 41972282, 41807253), the Opening Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry (SKLEG2021208), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2019JJ50763) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2021zzts0254).

PDF (Chinese)

372

PDF (English)

25

摘要： 随着全球工业化迅猛发展，土壤和地下水六价铬污染日益严重。基于某铁合金厂铬渣场地现场调查与采样分析，开展铬渣场地土样吸附、渗透和弥散试验，研究六价铬在粉质黏土土样中的吸附特性和迁移规律，建立考虑对流-弥散-吸附的六价铬迁移三维动力学模型，结合数值软件获取污染源位于场地上、下游时地下水中六价铬迁移分布特征，并揭示弥散度?和分配系数 对六价铬时空分布的影响。试验结果表明，粉质黏土对六价铬吸附符合Langmuir等温吸附模型，最大吸附量为466.6 mg/kg；蒸馏水和160 mg/L 六价铬溶液入渗下粉质黏土渗透系数约为6.5×10–7～6.7×10–7 cm/s，1 000 mg/L六价铬溶液的渗透系数增大至4.4×10–6 cm/s；粉质黏土水动力弥散系数D为1.4×10–4 m2/d，计算得到阻滞因子 为4.2～10。数值模拟结果表明，场地下游受到六价铬污染时，即使不考虑分子扩散作用，上游仍有被污染的风险，污染程度取决于含水层的弥散度；考虑含水层对六价铬吸附时，土体分配系数越大，六价铬污染羽分布范围越小，在预测地下水中六价铬浓度分布时应重点考虑六价铬吸附等转化过程。

关键词: 污染场地, 六价铬, 迁移转化, 弥散, 数值模拟

Abstract: With the rapid development of global industrialization, the pollution of hexavalent chromium (Cr(Ⅵ)) in soil and groundwater has become increasingly serious. Field investigation and laboratory tests were carried out for the soil polluted by the chromium slag of a ferroalloy plant. The adsorption, infiltration and dispersion experiments were conducted to study the adsorption characteristics and migration mechanism of Cr(Ⅵ) in silty clay. A three-dimensional kinetic mathematical model of Cr(Ⅵ) migration considering convection-dispersion-adsorption was established. The migration and distribution characteristics of Cr(Ⅵ) in groundwater with the pollution source located upstream or downstream of the contaminated site were obtained using the numerical approach. Meanwhile, the effects of dispersity (?) and distribution coefficient ( ) on the spatial and temporal distribution of Cr(Ⅵ) were revealed. The experimental results show that the Langmuir isotherm model well fits the adsorption data of silty clay. The maximum adsorption capacity of silty clay for Cr(Ⅵ) was 466.6 mg/kg. The hydraulic conductivity of silty clay under the infiltration of distilled water and 160 mg/L Cr(Ⅵ) solution was 6.5×10–7–6.7×10–7 cm/s, while it increased to 4.4×10–6 cm/s under infiltration of Cr(Ⅵ) solution with a concentration of 1 000 mg/L. The hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D) of silty clay was 1.4×10–4 m2/d. The value of the retardation factor ( ) was found to be 4.2–10. The results of the numerical simulation indicated that when the downstream was contaminated by Cr(Ⅵ), there was still a risk of pollution in the upstream even if molecular diffusion was not considered. The degree of pollution depended on the dispersity of the aquifer. Considering the adsorption of Cr(Ⅵ) by the aquifer, the higher the soil distribution coefficient, the smaller was the distribution range of the Cr(Ⅵ) pollution plume. Therefore, the transformation processes such as Cr(Ⅵ) adsorption should be focused on when predicting the distribution of Cr(Ⅵ) in contaminated sites.

Key words: contaminated site, hexavalent chromium Cr(Ⅵ), migration and transformation, dispersion, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • X 53
[1] 池小楼, 杨科, 刘文杰, 付强, 魏祯, . 大倾角煤层分层综采再生顶板破断规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1391-1400.
[2] 魏天宇, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 胡大伟, 周辉, 洪雯. 湿化膨胀与掺砂率对混合型缓冲材料 THM耦合过程的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 549-562.
[3] 侯晓萍, 樊恒辉. 基于COMSOL Multiphysics的非饱和 裂隙土降雨入渗特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 563-572.
[4] 马成昊, 朱长歧, 刘海峰, 崔翔, 王天民, 姜开放, 易明星, . 土的颗粒形貌研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2041-2058.
[5] 崔溦, 王利新, 江志安, 王超, 王枭华, 张社荣, . 基于修正立方定律的岩体粗糙裂隙网络 注浆过程模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2250-2258.
[6] 朱淳, 何满潮, 张晓虎, 陶志刚, 尹乾, 李利峰, . 恒阻大变形锚杆非线性力学模型 及恒阻行为影响参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
[7] 王兆耀, 刘红军, 杨奇, 赵真, 胡瑞庚, . 波流作用下大直径单桩的局部冲刷特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1178-1185.
[8] 陈猛, 崔秀文, 颜鑫, 王浩, 王二磊. 岩石−钢纤维混凝土复合层抗压强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.
[9] 石峰, 卢坤林, 尹志凯. 平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 735-745.
[10] 李红星, 冯世进, 何邵华, 张晓磊, 孙达明, . 砂土场地光热发电新型高强预应力混凝土短桩 基础受力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3217-3226.
[11] 王东坡, 何启维, 刘彦辉, 温继伟, 李伟, . 滚石冲击改进型开口帘式网耗能机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3356-3365.
[12] 梅锦玲, 曹洪, 骆冠勇, 潘泓, . 准三维有限元模型在多层地基区域渗流中 的扩展与适宜性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3428-3439.
[13] 郭金刚, 李耀晖, 何富连, 陈见行, 赵光明, 张俊文, . 基于残余剪切强度的全长黏结锚杆拉拔模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2953-2960.
[14] 金爱兵, 陈帅军, 赵安宇, 孙浩, 张玉帅, . 基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 255-264.
[15] 李军, 翟文宝, 陈朝伟, 柳贡慧, 周英操, . 基于零厚度内聚力单元的水力裂缝 随机扩展方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 265-279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平，侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵，冯夏庭，陈炳瑞，江 权，张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲，门玉明，彭建兵，黄强兵，刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟，何益斌，刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超，冯夏庭，陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆，齐清兰，魏静，霍倩，周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊，姜永东，鲜学福，罗 云，张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强，杨仕教，任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发