岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2828-2840.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2064

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑井阻时空变化的竖井地基非线性固结解析解

王洁1,李传勋1,郭霄2,卢萌盟3   

  1. 1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2. 浙江公路水运工程咨询有限责任公司,浙江 杭州 310006; 3. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-07 修回日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2022-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: lichuanxun@yeah.net E-mail:1250820640@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王洁,女,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51878320,No. 51878657)

Analytical solution for nonlinear consolidation of soft soil with vertical drains by considering time- and depth-variation of well resistance

WANG Jie1, LI Chuan-xun1, GUO Xiao2, LU Meng-meng3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. Zhejiang Highway and Waterage Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China; 3. School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2021-12-07 Revised:2022-06-23 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2022-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878320, 51878657).

摘要: 软土固结过程中展现出明显的非线性压缩和渗透特性,同时竖井的淤堵效应常导致井阻在固结过程中随深度和时间不断演化,但目前能考虑井阻随时空演化的竖井地基非线性固结解析解还很鲜见。通过引入孔隙比与有效应力及孔隙比与渗透系数间的半对数模型描述了土体的非线性固结特性,建立了能同时考虑井阻随时空变化和涂抹影响的竖井地基非线性固结模型,并采用分离变量法获得了固结模型的解析解。将特定参数下固结解的计算结果与实测数据、已有的竖井地基固结解答进行了对比分析以验证其可靠性。最后,对竖井地基的非线性固结性状开展了大量计算分析。结果表明:竖井渗透系数随深度线性衰减越明显则地基固结速率越慢;外荷载一定时,随着软土压缩指数cc与渗透率指数ck之比的增大,竖井地基固结速度减慢;在cc /ck值不变的情况下,外荷载增加,地基固结速率加快。在涂抹区的3种径向渗透系数变化模式中,抛物线变化模式下的地基固结速度最快,线性变化模式下的地基固结速度次之,恒定模式下的地基固结速度最慢,且这种性状并不因为考虑井阻变化或土体非线性固结特性而发生改变。

关键词: 竖井地基, 变井阻, 非线性固结, 涂抹, 解析解

Abstract: The soft soil usually exhibits obvious nonlinear compressibility and permeability characteristics during the consolidation process. At the same time, the clogging effect of vertical drains often causes the well resistance to change with depth and time during the consolidation process. However, the analytical solution for nonlinear consolidation of soils with vertical drain, in which the variation of well resistance over time and depth can be considered, is still rarely reported in the literature. In this study, semi-logarithmic models between the void ratio and the effective stress, and between the void ratio and the permeability coefficient are introduced to describe the nonlinear consolidation characteristics of soils, and a nonlinear consolidation model of soils with vertical drain, which can simultaneously consider the time- and depth-variation of well resistance and the influence of smearing, is developed, then the analytical solution of this consolidation model is obtained by the method of separated variables. The consolidation calculation results derived here under specific parameters are compared with the laboratory tests data, and the existing vertical drains consolidation solutions to verify its reliability. Finally, a large number of calculations and analyses have been carried out on the nonlinear consolidation behavior. The results show that the more obvious the linear decay of the vertical drain permeability coefficient with depth is, the slower the consolidation rate of soils with vertical drain is. Considering the exponential decrement of the vertical drain permeability coefficient with time, the consolidation rate of soils with vertical drain is much slower than that with consideration of the vertical drain permeability coefficient remaining constant over time. When the external load is constant, the consolidation rate of the vertical drain foundation decreases with the ratio of the soft soil compression index (cc) to the permeability index (ck) increases. When the value of cc/ck remains constant, the consolidation rate of the vertical drain foundation increases with the external load increases. Among the three variations related with horizontal permeability in smear zone, the vertical drain consolidation rate is the fastest under the parabolic variation mode, the next is the linear variation mode, and the vertical drain consolidation rate under the constant variation mode is the slowest. The influences of smear zone on consolidation behavior are not affected by the change of well resistance and the nonlinear consolidation characteristics of soils.

Key words: vertical drain, variable well resistance, nonlinear consolidation, smearing, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447
[1] 秦爱芳, 孟红苹, 江良华. 电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 97-106.
[2] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[3] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[4] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 刘建文, 彭铸, . 邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖对下卧 盾构隧道影响的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2176-2190.
[5] 杨涛, 吉映竹, . 变荷载下长排水体-短不排水桩 复合地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1187-1196.
[6] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
[7] 邱金伟, 权全, 刘军, 童军, 胡波, . 考虑非等温环境下污染物在黏土中的运移解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 423-431.
[8] 江文豪, 李江山, 黄啸, 程鑫, 万勇, . 非等温分布条件下考虑半透水边界时饱和黏土的一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2744-2756.
[9] 赵爽, 余俊, 刘新源, 胡钟伟. 悬臂式刚性墙动力响应解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 152-159.
[10] 王祖贤, 施成华, 刘建文. 非对称推力作用下盾构隧道附加响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2449-2460.
[11] 卢一为, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 郑长杰, . 均匀黏弹性地基中X形桩纵向振动 响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2472-2479.
[12] 仇超, 李传勋, 李红军, . 单级等速加载下高压缩性软土 非线性大应变固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2195-2206.
[13] 林伟岸, 江文豪, 詹良通. 考虑真空加载过程及堆载随时间变化下 砂井地基的普遍固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1828-1838.
[14] 秦爱芳, 江良华, 许薇芳, 梅国雄, . 连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1345-1354.
[15] 凌道盛, 赵天浩, 钮家军, 朱松, 单振东, . 混合非齐次边界下非饱和土一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .