岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3347-3356.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0377

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩溶区穿越溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法 与试验研究

雷勇,李鹏甲,刘泽宇,李金朝,胡伟   

  1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28 修回日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-02
  • 作者简介:雷勇,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基础及特殊土地基处理方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51878270,No.52178332);湖南省自然科学基金(No.2022JJ30253)。

Method for calculation of buckling critical load of pile foundation crossing karst cave in karst area

LEI Yong, LI Peng-jia, LIU Ze-yu, LI Jin-zhao, HU Wei   

  1. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2022-03-28 Revised:2022-06-23 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878270, 52178332) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2022JJ30253).

摘要:

基桩穿越大型溶洞时可能发生屈曲失稳,屈曲临界荷载即为基桩极限承载力。针对岩溶区穿越单层溶洞基桩屈曲问题,依据能量法原理建立了穿越单层溶洞基桩总势能方程。根据基桩屈曲的突变特性,引入尖点突变理论,建立了基桩在顶部弹嵌、底部嵌固情况下失稳的尖点突变模型,导出了该体系的分岔集方程,进而通过分析其失稳条件,提出了穿越单层溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法。为验证理论方法的合理性,进行了基桩穿越不同高度溶洞的室内模型试验,研究表明:(1)基桩主要发生桩身压缩破坏和屈曲破坏,洞高小于6 时基桩发生材料压缩破坏,洞高大于等于6 时基桩发生屈曲,位移最大点位于临空段的中点;(2)基桩屈曲临界荷载随洞高增大呈线性减小,理论方法适用于基桩发生屈曲的情况,且与试验结果吻合较好;(3)洞高越小、顶板越厚、基桩弹性模量越大、桩−岩界面越粗糙,则基桩屈曲临界荷载越大,反之则越小。

关键词: 岩溶基桩, 屈曲破坏, 试验研究, 突变理论, 临界洞高

Abstract:

Buckling instability may occur when pile foundation passes through large caves, and the critical buckling load is the ultimate bearing capacity of pile foundation. To solve the buckling problem of pile foundation crossing single layer karst cave in karst area, a total potential energy equation of pile foundation crossing single layer karst cave is established according to the principle of energy method. According to the catastrophe characteristics of pile foundation buckling, the cusp catastrophe theory is introduced, and a cusp catastrophe model of pile foundation instability under the condition of elastic embedding at the top and fixity at the bottom is established. The bifurcation set equation of the system is derived, and then by analyzing its instability conditions, the method of calculation of buckling critical load of pile foundation crossing single-layer karst cave is developed. In order to verify the rationality of the proposed method, laboratory model tests of pile foundation crossing karst caves with different heights are carried out. Some conclusions are drawn. 1) The compression failure and buckling failure are main forms. When the height of the cave is less than 6d, the foundation pile fails due to material compression failure. When the height of the cave is greater than or equal to 6d, the buckling occurs in pile foundation. The maximum displacement point is observed to be located at the midpoint of the karst cave section. 2) The critical buckling load of pile foundation decreases linearly with the increase of cave height. The proposed method is suitable for the buckling of pile foundation, and it is in good agreement with the experimental results. 3) The small cave height, thick roof, great elastic modulus of the pile foundation, and rough pile-rock interface can result in a great critical buckling load, and not vice versa.

Key words: karst pile foundation, buckling failure, experimental study, catastrophe theory, critical cave height

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 阮永芬, 张虔, 乔文件, 裴利华, 闫明, 郭宇航, . 基于C-V-T模型的盾构穿越既有桥梁施工风险评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 552-562.
[2] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[3] 崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 吕苏颖, 熊辉辉, 曾晨, 韩尚宇, . 黄豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀多变量试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3027-3035.
[4] 金爱兵, 王杰, 陈帅军, 李海, . 基于不同粒径分布尾砂的充填体强度及 损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3083-3093.
[5] 刘轩廷, 陈从新, 刘秀敏, 夏开宗, 张褚强, 王田龙, 王月, . 充填开采下顶板−间柱支撑体系的突变失稳分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2461-2471.
[6] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[7] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[8] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[9] 徐晓冬, 孙光华, 姚旭龙, 梁学健, 邵陆航, . 基于能量耗散与释放的充填体失稳 尖点突变预警模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3003-3012.
[10] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[11] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[12] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[13] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[14] 雷勇, 邓加政, 刘泽宇, 李君杰, 邹根. 考虑荷载位置偏移的空洞岩石地基极限承载力 计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3326-3331.
[15] 周其健, 马德翠, 邓荣贵, 康景文, 祝全兵, . 地热系统作用下红层软岩力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3333-3342.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .