岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2432-2444.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1391

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥形聚晶金刚石复合片齿破岩特征与机制研究

熊超1, 2，黄中伟2，王立超3，史怀忠2，赫文豪2，陈振良2，李根生2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学（北京）机械与储运工程学院，北京 102249；2. 中国石油大学（北京）油气资源与工程全国重点实验室，北京 102249； 3. 中国石油国际勘探开发有限公司，北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-08 接受日期:2022-10-23 出版日期:2023-08-21 发布日期:2023-08-21
  • 通讯作者: 黄中伟，男，1972年生，博士，教授，主要从事油气井流体力学与完井增产技术方面的研究。E-mail：huangzw@cup.edu.cn E-mail:xiongc@cup.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:熊超，男，1993年生，博士（后），主要从事异形PDC齿破岩机制及干热岩钻井提速技术方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（No. U19B6003-05）；国家重点研发计划项目（No. 2019YFA0708302）；中国石油大学（北京）科研基金（No.2462023SZBH003）；北京高校卓越青年科学家计划项目（No. BJJWZYJH01201911414038）。

Rock breaking characteristics and mechanism of conical polycrystalline diamond compact cutter

XIONG Chao1, 2, HUANG Zhong-wei2, WANG Li-chao3, SHI Huai-zhong2, HE Wen-hao2, CHEN Zhen-liang2, LI Gen-sheng2   

  1. 1. College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; 2. National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China; 3. China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co. Ltd., Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2022-09-08 Accepted:2022-10-23 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19B6003-05), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0708302), the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No.2462023SZBH003), and the Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201911414038).

PDF (Chinese)

216

摘要： 锥形聚晶金刚石复合片（polycrystalline diamond compact，PDC）齿是一种具有较强抗冲击性和耐磨性的新型PDC齿，在坚硬、强研磨性和软硬交错地层中取得了非常好的钻井提速效果。为了揭示锥形齿破碎硬岩机制，开展锥形齿破碎花岗岩试验与数值模拟研究，分析了切削深度和前倾角对锥形齿切削力和破岩比能的影响规律，采用高速摄像机和透明K9玻璃观测了锥形齿作用下岩屑形成过程及微裂纹萌生与扩展过程，通过数值模拟分析了破岩过程中岩石应力响应与损伤演化特性，结合对切削槽和大尺寸块体岩屑表面形貌及断口微观特征分析，建立了锥形齿破碎花岗岩机制模型。结果表明，锥形齿破碎花岗岩的过程可以分为挤压成核和块体崩裂两个阶段，前倾角对岩石破碎过程影响较小，切削深度的影响显著；锥形齿周围的裂纹主要由压实核、纵向裂纹和横向裂纹组成，纵向裂纹和横向裂纹扩展的最大深度分别为切削深度的6.69倍和4.53倍；齿尖周围压应力集中，岩石发生压剪破坏，压应力区外围形成弧形条带状拉应力区，并在齿尖及压应力区边界处诱导出拉伸微裂纹；微裂纹向齿前扩展形成弧形拉伸主裂纹，发生块体岩屑崩裂，提高破岩效率，向岩石内部扩展劣化岩石强度，形成底部损伤区，提高后续破岩效率。

关键词: 锥形PDC齿, 花岗岩, 破岩过程, 破岩机制

Abstract: Conical polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutter is a new type of PDC cutter with high impact and wear resistance, which has a very good drilling effect in hard, strong abrasion, and soft-hard interbedded formations. In order to reveal the hard-rock breaking mechanism of conical PDC cutters, the laboratory test and numerical simulation on the granite broken by the conical PDC cutter were carried out. The influence law of cutting depth and front rake angle on cutting force and rock breaking specific energy of the conical PDC cutter was analyzed. In the laboratory test, a high-speed camera and transparent K9 glass were used to observe the formation process of cuttings and the initiation and propagation of microcracks under the action of conical PDC cutters. The stress response and damage evolution characteristics during the rock breaking process were analyzed by numerical simulation. The surface morphology and fracture microscopic characteristics of cutting grooves and large-size cuttings were analyzed, and the mechanical model of conical PDC cutters to break granite was established. The results show that the granite breaking process can be divided into two stages: crushing and chipping. The effect of the front rake angle on the rock breaking process is relatively small, while the influence of cutting depth is significant. The cracks around the conical PDC cutter are mainly composed of compaction nucleation, longitudinal crack and transverse crack. The maximum propagation depth of the longitudinal and transverse cracks is 6.69 and 4.53 times the cutting depth, respectively. The compressive stress around the cutter tip is concentrated, the shear-compression failure occurs, an arc-shaped strip-like tensile stress zone is formed at the periphery of the compressive stress zone, and the tensile micro-cracks are induced at the boundary of the cutter tip and compressive stress zone. When the micro-crack propagates to the front of conical PDC cutters to form an arc-shaped tensile main crack, the block debris cracking occurs, which improves the rock breaking efficiency. Meanwhile, the tensile micro-cracks propagate to the rock inside and deteriorate rock strength, a bottom damaged area is formed, which improves the rock breakage efficiency of the subsequent cutting.

Key words: conical polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutter, granite, rock breaking process, rock breaking mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TE 242
[1] 王洪建, 崔炎宗, 袁广祥, 赵菲, 张翼宇, 黄志全. 基于单轴压缩试验的不同风化程度花岗岩分形特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2249-2265.
[2] 王春, 胡慢谷, 王成, . 热−水−力作用下圆孔花岗岩的动态损伤特征及结构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 741-756.
[3] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 周振华, 简涛, 李甜果, . 卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 473-482.
[4] 汤华, 严松, 杨兴洪, 吴振君, . 差异含水率下全风化混合花岗岩抗剪强度 与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 55-66.
[5] 汪洋, 陈文化. 基于裂隙形状函数的自然环境高温下花岗岩 裂隙尖部非线性温度场[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 267-274.
[6] 胡训健, 卞康, 刘建, 谢正勇, 陈明, 李冰洋, 岑越, . 离散裂隙网络对岩石力学性质和声发射特性 影响的颗粒流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 542-552.
[7] 汤连生, 王昊, 孙银磊, 刘其鑫, . 干湿过程中花岗岩残积土抗拉强度变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1749-1760.
[8] 王刚, 宋磊博, 刘夕奇, 包春燕, 吝曼卿, 刘广建, . 非贯通节理花岗岩剪切断裂力学特性及 声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1533-1545.
[9] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[10] 周辉, 徐福通, 卢景景, 高阳, 肖建成, . 切槽对TBM刀具破岩机制的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 625-634.
[11] 薛卉, 舒彪, 陈君洁, 路伟, 胡永鹏, 王益民, 曾凡, 黄若宸, . 高温高压下超临界二氧化碳作用对花岗岩 力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 377-384.
[12] 李艳, 程禹翰, 翟越, 魏盛宇, 杨宇冰, 赵瑞峰, 梁文彪, . 高温后花岗岩微观结构演化特性与 动态力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3316-3326.
[13] 肖建成, 卢景景, 周辉, 徐福通, 冯春, . 贯入角度对截齿破岩性能与几何排布的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3372-3384.
[14] 徐鼎平, 郭广涛, 夏跃林, 柳秀洋, 江权, 李邵军, 李治国, . 高应力强卸荷下双江口花岗岩岩爆中间 主应力效应宏细观试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2375-2386.
[15] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平，侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵，冯夏庭，陈炳瑞，江 权，张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲，门玉明，彭建兵，黄强兵，刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟，何益斌，刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超，冯夏庭，陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆，齐清兰，魏静，霍倩，周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊，姜永东，鲜学福，罗 云，张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强，杨仕教，任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发