岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1051-1066.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0635

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法

邓东平1,杨春会2,谢志军3   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 湖南路桥建设集团有限责任公司,湖南 长沙 410000; 3. 湖南省平益高速公路建设开发有限公司,湖南 岳阳 414517
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-21 接受日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 作者简介:邓东平,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail:dengdp@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52278380);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2023JJ30670);湖南省交通运输厅科技项目(No. 202008)。

M-P method for analyzing the long-term stability of slope reinforced by pre-stressed cables under the nonlinear M-C strength criterion

DENG Dong-ping1, YANG Chun-hui2, XIE Zhi-jun3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. Hunan Road and Bridge Construction Group Co. Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410000, China; 3. Hunan Pingyi Expressway Construction and Development Co. Ltd., Yueyang, Hunan 414517, China
  • Received:2023-05-21 Accepted:2023-08-28 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278380), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ30670) and the Hunan Provincial Transportation Department Science and Technology Project of China (202008).

摘要: 拓展传统极限平衡方法在复杂条件下边坡稳定性分析中的适用性一直是岩土工程界的研究热点。众所周知,边坡岩土体剪切失效一般服从于非线性强度准则,而传统极限平衡方法仅适用于线性强度准则下边坡稳定性分析。此外,预应力锚索作为一种主动防护措施,可极大地即时提高边坡稳定性而被广泛应用于中、大型边坡工程加固。然而,在应力松弛、蠕变效应以及腐蚀环境影响下预应力锚索加固边坡稳定性时效特征往往被忽视。由此,基于Morgenstern-Price(M-P)法,嵌入非线性Mohr-Coulomb(M-C)强度准则,并融入应力松弛与蠕变效应下锚索预应力损失模型以及腐蚀环境下锚索性能劣化模型,从而,建立非线性强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡安全系数时程表达式。进一步,为了解决非线性强度准则下隐式嵌套公式难以求解的问题,归零化条间法向力初始值,并应用迭代循环求解策略,在引入循环终止允许误差判别条件后,可实现边坡稳定性理论真实结果的逼近求解。经过后续算例对比分析,验证了所提方法的可行性和合理性,与此同时,还研究了不同预应力损失速率和不同锈蚀环境下预应力锚索加固边坡稳定性的时效变化规律。

关键词: 边坡, 极限平衡M-P法, 非线性M-C强度准则, 预应力锚索加固, 时效稳定性

Abstract: Expanding the applicability of traditional limit equilibrium (LE) methods in slope stability analysis under complex conditions has been a research hotspot in geotechnical engineering field. It is recognized that the shear failure of geotechnical body of slope is typically governed by nonlinear strength criteria, while the traditional LE method is only applicable to the slope stability analysis under the linear strength criterion. Pre-stressed anchors, as an active protection measure, are widely used in the reinforcement of medium and large-scale slope projects because they can greatly and instantly improve the stability of slopes. However, the long-term stability characteristics of slope reinforced by the pre-stressed cables, including stress relaxation, creep, and the effects of corrosion, are often overlooked. To address these issues, an approach based on the Morgenstern-Price (M-P) has been developed. This method incorporates the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) criterion and integrates the pre-stress loss model of the cables under stress relaxation and creep effects, as well as the performance deterioration model of the cables under the influence of corrosion. In order to tackle the challenge of solving implicit nested formulas under the nonlinear strength criterion, the initial value of the inter-slice normal force is set to zero, and an iterative loop calculation strategy is applied. Subsequently, the approximation of the real theoretical results of slope stability can be realized by introducing the criterion of the allowable error of loop termination. Through comparison and analysis of various examples, the feasibility and rationality of this method have been verified. Furthermore, the variation patterns of long-term stability of slope reinforced by the pre-stressed cables under different pre-stressed loss rates and different corrosion environments are also studied.

Key words: slope, limit equilibrium M-P method, nonlinear M-C strength criterion, reinforced by pre-stressed cables, long-term stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 柳伟, 徐长节, 杜昊东, 朱怀龙, 王长虹, . 基于修正统一硬化模型的超固结非饱和红黏土边坡稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1233-1241.
[2] 胡鸿鹏, 蒋水华, 陈东, 黄劲松, 周创兵, . 基于改进贝叶斯更新方法的边坡参数概率反分析及可靠度评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 835-845.
[3] 赵迎宵, 何伟鹏, 丁晓英, 詹俊, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 缪晓星, 王延秀, 卢海静, 邢光延, 李华坦, 张培豪、. 西宁盆地黄土区草本植物边坡电阻率与土体物理力学性质关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 477-488.
[4] 屈小磊, 张云开, 陈悠然, 陈悠扬, 戚承志, . 耦合渗流-变形的数值流形法裂隙岩质边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 313-324.
[5] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[6] 苟永平, 叶琼瑶, 韦立德, 司家琛, . 央达隧道掌子面前方边坡地表开裂研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 548-560.
[7] 华成亚, 姚磊华. 边坡失稳三类能量突变判据的统一性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 603-611.
[8] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[9] 许彬, 刘新荣, 周小涵, 梁越, 钟祖良, 刘俊, 邓志云. 考虑贯通型结构面强度震动退化的岩质边坡动力稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2419-2431.
[10] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[11] 刘国锋, 冯坤, 晏长根, 丰光亮, 徐鼎平, 周迟, . 考虑力学参数不确定性的岩质边坡开挖卸荷响应概率评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2115-2128.
[12] 申辉, 刘亚群, 刘博, 李海波, . 地震波斜入射下岩质边坡放大效应的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2129-2142.
[13] 马鹏杰, 芮瑞, 曹先振, 夏荣基, 王曦, 丁锐恒, 孙天健, . 微型桩加固长大缓倾裂隙土边坡模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1695-1707.
[14] 冷先伦, 王川, 盛谦, 宋文军, 陈健, 张占荣, 陈菲, . 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1283-1294.
[15] 王川, 冷先伦, 张占荣, 杨闯, 陈健, . 基于裂隙扩展的多级岩质边坡 开挖卸荷破坏路径分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1190-1203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .