深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0470

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2847-2854.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0470

深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征

李桐^{1, 2}，冯夏庭^{1, 3}，王睿⁴，肖亚勋¹，王勇⁴，丰光亮¹，姚志宾³，牛文静³

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049； 3. 东北大学深部金属矿山安全开采教育部重点实验室，辽宁沈阳 110819；4. 中国铁路总公司拉林铁路建设总指挥部，西宁青海 810007

收稿日期:2018-03-28 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-28
作者简介:李桐，男，1993年生，硕士研究生，主要从事深埋隧道现场岩爆监测、预警分析等研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No. 51621006，No. 41320104005，No. 51509244)；中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划项目(No. 2017G006-B)。

Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel

LI Tong^{1, 2}, FENG Xia-ting^{1, 3}, WANG Rui⁴, XIAO Ya-xun¹, WANG Yong⁴, FENG Guang-liang¹, YAO Zhi-bin³, NIU Wen-jing³

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China; 4. Lhasa-Nyingchi Railway Construction Headquarters of China Railway, Xining, Qinghai 810007, China

Received:2018-03-28 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-28
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51621006, 41320104005, 51509244) and the Science and Technology Development Project of China Railway (2017G006-B).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 川藏铁路拉林段控制性工程巴玉隧道，施工过程中岩爆频发且呈现邻近区域岩爆位置不一现象。为此，通过微震监测系统原位观测了岩爆位置偏转过程中的岩体破裂演化规律，进一步探讨了岩爆位置发生偏转的原因。研究结果表明：岩爆位置偏转段两侧微震信息呈不均匀分布特征，微震活动（事件数、能量和视体积等参数）随岩爆偏转向岩爆发生位置集核偏转，两者具有良好的空间相关性。岩爆位置偏转段岩体损伤区及视应力的演化特征说明岩爆位置偏转与局部应力集中区变化相关，应力集中程度大的区域更易发生岩爆。相关研究成果对岩爆位置偏转预警及防治具有一定借鉴和参考意义。

关键词: 深埋隧道, 川藏铁路, 岩爆, 微震监测, 偏转, 应力集中区

Abstract: The Bayu tunnel is a controlled project in Nyingchi-Lhasa section of the Sichuan-Tibet railway. Rockbursts happen frequently, and rockburst locations are different in adjacent areas during the construction process. By using the microseismic monitoring system, the evolution laws of rock mass fracture were observed in situ during the process of rockburst location deflection. In addition, the reasons for the deflection of the rockburst locations were discussed. The results showed that the microseismic information was distributed unevenly on both sides of rockburst location deflection. Meanwhile, all the microseismic activities (the number of events, energy and apparent volume) deflected with the deflection of rockburst location, which indicates that they have an obvious spatial correlation. The evolution laws of apparent stress and excavation damaged zones of rock mass in the deflection location reveal that the deflection of rockburst location is related to the change of local stress concentration area, and the rockburst more easily occurs in the area with larger stress concentration. The results provide significant references for the warning and prevention of the deflection of the rockburst locations.

Key words: deep-buried tunnel, the Sichuan-Tibet railway, rockburst, microseismic monitoring, deflect, stress concentration area

中图分类号:

TU 459

李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.

LI Tong, FENG Xia-ting, WANG Rui, XIAO Ya-xun, WANG Yong, FENG Guang-liang, YAO Zhi-bin, NIU Wen-jing, . Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2]	陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3]	毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4]	陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[5]	周辉, 陈珺, 张传庆, 朱勇, 卢景景, 姜玥, . 低强高脆岩爆模型材料配比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[6]	赵振华, 张晓君, 李晓程, . 含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2192-2199.
[7]	苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[8]	罗丹旎, 苏国韶, 何保煜, . 不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[9]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[10]	王剑锋, 李天斌, 马春驰, 张航, 韩瑀萱, 周雄华, 姜宇鹏, . 基于引力搜索法的隧道围岩微震定位研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4421-4428.
[11]	卢志国, 鞠文君, 赵毅鑫, 王浩, 郑建伟, 刘爱卿, . 采动诱发应力主轴偏转对断层稳定性影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4459-4466.
[12]	梅诗明, 胡小川, 苏国, 陈冠言, . 中间主应力对隧洞岩爆影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[13]	赵菲, 王洪建, 何满潮, 袁广祥, 罗耀武, . 不同高度花岗岩岩爆试验的声发射特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[14]	蒋雄, 徐奴文, 周钟, 侯东奇, 李昂, 张敏, . 两河口水电站母线洞开挖过程围岩破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 305-314.
[15]	王之东, 黎立云, 陈滔, 刘兵权, . 矿柱岩爆模型试验中能量释放研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征

Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0