面板对路堤式加筋土挡墙力学特性的影响

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 881-886.

面板对路堤式加筋土挡墙力学特性的影响

叶观宝^{1, 2}，张振^{1, 2}，邢皓枫^{1, 2}，徐超^{1, 2}

1. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092；2. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092

收稿日期:2010-11-16 出版日期:2012-03-10 发布日期:2012-03-12
作者简介:叶观宝，男，1964年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事地基处理与托换技术教学与研究。
基金资助:
上海市重点学科建设资助项目（No. B308）。

Influence of facing on mechanical behavior of reinforced retaining wall for embankment

YE Guan-bao^{1, 2}, ZHANG Zhen^{1, 2}, XING Hao-feng^{1, 2}, XU Chao^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2010-11-16 Online:2012-03-10 Published:2012-03-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 加筋土挡墙作为一种新型的轻型支挡结构，广泛应用于公路、铁路、港口等工程中。随着加筋土挡墙技术的发展，面板的类型也越来越丰富。利用Plaxis有限元软件，对路堤式加筋土挡墙进行了二维有限元计算分析。针对墙背水平土压力、垂直土压力、挡墙侧向位移、筋材应变和挡墙稳定系数等计算结果的分析，探讨了3种类型面板（返包式面板、整体式面板和拼装式面板）对路堤式加筋土挡墙力学性能的影响。研究结果表明，垂直和水平土压力的数值计算结果均小于理论值；相比较与其他两种面板的加筋土挡墙，返包式面板加筋土挡墙筋材的应变最大；面板类型对于加筋土挡墙的整体稳定性几乎没有影响。研究成果为实际工程的应用提供了理论指导。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 面板, 土压力, 有限元法

Abstract: As a new light-retaining structure, the reinforced earth retaining wall has been widely used in roads, railways and ports. And with the rapid development of the technology of reinforced earth retaining wall, the types of facing are also more and more abundant. A two-dimensional (2D) finite element analysis is conducted to simulate a reinforced earth retaining wall for embankment by using the finite element software Plaxis. To investigate the influence of different facing types on the mechanical behavior of the reinforced earth retaining wall for embankment, the calculated results of reinforced earth retaining wall with three facing types (wrapped facing, overall facing and assembled facing) are analyzed, including the lateral earth pressure, the vertical earth pressure, the lateral deformation of retaining wall, the strain of reinforcement, and the factor of stability. It is found that the numerical results of vertical and lateral earth pressures are less than theoretical results. The reinforced earth retaining wall with the wrapped facing has a larger strain than those with the other two facing types. Furthermore, the three facing types have little influence on the overall stability of reinforced earth retaining wall. These results provide theoretical guidance for engineering application.

Key words: reinforced earth retaining wall, facing, earth pressure, finite element method

中图分类号:

TU 443

叶观宝，张振，邢皓枫，徐超. 面板对路堤式加筋土挡墙力学特性的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 881-886.

YE Guan-bao , ZHANG Zhen , XING Hao-feng , XU Chao. Influence of facing on mechanical behavior of reinforced retaining wall for embankment[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 881-886.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[2]	曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[3]	赵晓彦, 范宇飞, 刘亮, 蒋楚生, . 铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙潜在破裂面特征模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[4]	黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[5]	陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[6]	汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 张嘉文, 姚文博. 地层渐进成拱对浅埋隧道上覆土压力影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2311-2322.
[7]	王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[8]	芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[9]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷涛, 刘琪, 王智猛, 刘勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[10]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 王珣, 黄昊威, 黄哲, 王智猛, . 面板对加筋土挡墙影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[11]	邵生俊, 陈菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[12]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[13]	唐德琪, 俞峰, 陈奕天, 刘念武, . 既有−新增排桩双层支挡结构开挖模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1039-1048.
[14]	王家全, 张亮亮, 赖毅, 陆梦梁, 叶斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[15]	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed