›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1825-1830.

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

膨胀土裂隙的工程特性研究

龚壁卫,程展林,胡 波,赵 亮   

  1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-15 出版日期:2014-07-10 发布日期:2014-07-11
  • 作者简介:龚壁卫,男,1962年生,硕士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事环境岩土工程以及非饱和土、膨胀土等特殊土的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题(No. 2011BAB10B05);国家自然科学基金课题(No. 51279015)。

Research on engineering properties of fissures in expansive soil

GONG Bi-wei,CHENG Zhan-lin,HU Bo,ZHAO Liang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • Received:2013-08-15 Online:2014-07-10 Published:2014-07-11

摘要: 裂隙是膨胀土的重要特征之一,长期以来,人们常常把分布于膨胀土大气影响深度范围内受干湿循环影响而产生的干缩裂隙与膨胀土地层中特有的原生裂隙混为一谈。在对膨胀土边坡失稳机制的研究中,也忽视了原生裂隙对边坡稳定的重要影响。为研究南水北调中线工程膨胀土地段渠道破坏机制,在河南省南阳市郊建设了一条长为2.05 km试验渠道,通过渠道开挖期间的地质勘察、现场观测和取样试验,以及对现场滑坡体的取样分析,研究了膨胀土裂隙及周边土体的物质成分、密度、含水率和强度特性,结合现场观测资料分析了裂隙与渠道滑坡的关系。研究表明,膨胀土地层中的原生裂隙有两种类型:光滑蜡状裂隙和有一定厚度充填黏土的裂隙。裂隙面上的物质成分与两侧土略有不同,且天然密度低、含水率高,强度远低于相邻土体的强度,一旦地层与边坡倾向一致,将产生沿裂隙面的滑动。

关键词: 南水北调中线工程, 膨胀土, 裂隙, 强度特性, 破坏机制

Abstract: Fissure is one of the important characteristics of expansive soils. Shrinkage fissures induced by the wetting-drying cycle effects and the specific inherent fissures distributed in atmospheric influential depth of expansive soil are often confused. In the study of expansive soil slope failure mechanism, the significant impact of the inherent fissure on slope stability is often ignored. In order to study the failure mechanism of expansive soil in middle route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project, a 2.05 km test channel is constructed on the outskirts of Nanyang, Henan province. Geological survey, field observations and sampling tests during excavation, as well as on-site sampling and analysis of slope failure are conducted to study the material composition of expansive soil fissure and the density, water content and strength characteristics of the surrounding soil. Combined with field observations, the relationship between fissures and channel landslide is analyzed. It is shown that there are two types of inherent fissures for the expansive stratum: one is smooth waxy fissure; and the other is filling clay fissure with a certain thickness. The material composition of the fissure surface is slightly different with the adjacent soil, featured by low natural density and high moisture content; and the intensity is much less than the strength of the adjacent soil. Once the formation is consistent with the slope tendency, it would slide along the fissure surface.

Key words: middle route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project, expansive soil, fissure, strength characteristic, failure mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[2] 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[3] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[4] 支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[5] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[6] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[7] 吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
[8] 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[9] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[10] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[11] 李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[12] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[13] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[14] 张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[15] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 瞿万波,刘新荣,傅晏,秦晓英. 洞桩法大断面群洞交叉隧道初衬数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2799 -2804 .
[2] 郭保华. 单孔岩样水压致裂的数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1965 -1970 .
[3] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[4] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[5] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[6] 魏新江,郭志威,魏 纲,张世民. 考虑渗流影响的盾构出洞灾害机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 106 -110 .
[7] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[8] 武思宇,宋二祥. 刚性桩复合地基地震反应机理分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 785 -792 .
[9] 齐静静,徐日庆,魏 纲. 盾构施工引起土体三维变形的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2442 -2446 .
[10] 杨建平,陈卫忠,戴永浩. 裂隙岩体变形模量尺寸效应研究Ⅰ:有限元法[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1538 -1545 .