›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3324-3328.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.035

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉砂地层盾构隧道开挖面稳定性离心试验及数值模拟

吕玺琳1, 2,周运才1, 2,李冯缔1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-07 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:吕玺琳,男,1981年生,副教授,博导,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(No. 50908171);上海市自然科学基金(No. 13ZR1443800)。

Centrifuge model test and numerical simulation of stability of excavation face of shield tunnel in silty sand

LÜ Xi-lin1, 2, ZHOU Yun-cai1, 2, LI Feng-di1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2016-01-07 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (50908171) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China (13ZR1443800).

摘要: 通过开展离心模型试验,对干粉砂及饱和粉砂中盾构隧道开挖面的失稳破坏特性和极限支护压力进行了研究。通过远程控制开挖面土体位移,获得了支护压力与开挖面位移间的关系曲线及开挖面达到主动极限平衡状态时的破坏模式。2组干砂离心模型试验结果表明,当隧道埋深与隧道直径比从0.5增大到1时,开挖面破坏模式从整体坍塌破坏转变为烟囱状,但极限支护压力变化较小。饱和砂土中的试验表明,开挖面水平方向破坏范围相比在相同埋深干砂中的范围扩大,极限支护压力显著增加。对开挖面破坏过程进行三维弹塑性有限元数值模拟,获得了开挖面极限支护压力和破坏机制,所得结果与试验吻合较好。进一步通过数值模拟,分析了土体强度参数、隧道埋深及渗流对极限支护压力的影响规律。结果表明,渗流条件下开挖面破坏区域及极限支护压力均大于无渗流情况,极限支护压力随内摩擦角增大而减小,随隧道埋深增大而减小。

关键词: 粉砂, 盾构隧道, 开挖面稳定, 离心模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Through centrifugal model tests, the failure characteristics of the shield tunnel excavation face and the limit support pressure in dry and saturated silty sands are studied. By means of remote control of soil displacement, the relationships between the support pressure and the displacement of the excavation face are obtained, and the failure mode of the excavation face to the active limit equilibrium state is revealed. Two sets of dry silty sand centrifuge model test results show that when the ratio of tunnel depth to the tunnel diameter is from 0.5 to 1, the failure mode of the excavation face is changed from the whole collapse to funnel shape, but the change of of the limit support pressure is small. The test in saturated silty sand shows that the destruction extent in the horizontal direction of the excavation face is more than that at the same buried depth in dry sand, and the limit of the support pressure increases significantly. Three-dimensional elastoplastic finite element method is used to simulate the failure process of excavation face, and then the limit support pressure and failure mechanism of the excavation face are obtained. The numerical simulations are in good agreement with the experimental results. Additionally, the influence of the soil strength parameters, tunnel depth and seepage on the limit support pressure is further analyzed through the numerical simulation, it is shown that the damage area and the limit support pressure of the excavation face are larger than that of the nonseepage condition; the limit support pressure decreases with the increase of the internal frictional angle, and decreases with the increase of the tunnel depth.

Key words: silty sand, shield tunnel, stability of excavation face, centrifuge model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 91

[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[5] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[6] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[7] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[8] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[9] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[10] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[11] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[12] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[13] 杨振兴, 陈健, 孙振川, 游永锋, 周建军, 吕乾乾, . 泥水平衡盾构用海水泥浆的改性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 501-508.
[14] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[15] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!