岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 132-140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2177

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究

李翻翻1, 2,陈卫忠1,雷江1, 2,于洪丹1,马永尚1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-29 修回日期:2019-06-17 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈卫忠,男,1968年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学及研究工作。E-mail: wzchen@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:13665699326@sina.cn
  • 作者简介:李翻翻,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事深部巷道围岩常规力学及蠕变力学特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51479190);比利时核废料地质处置研究中心合作项目(No. EUR-12-110);中国科学院青年创新促进会资助。

Study of mechanical properties of claystone based on plastic damage

LI Fan-fan1, 2, CHEN Wei-zhong1, LEI Jiang1, 2, YU Hong-dan1, MA Yong-shang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Revised:2019-06-17 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479190), Cooperation Project of the European Underground Research Infrastructure for Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Clay Environment, Mol, Belgium (EUR-12-110) and the Fundation of Youth Innovation Promotion Association.

摘要: 一系列三轴压缩试验表明,黏土岩的力学特性与其应力状态相关。主要表现为:围压越大,黏土岩试样应力峰值越大,且峰值出现得越晚。这是因为高围压试样内部微裂纹闭合趋势更加明显,从而对于微裂纹的发展具有一定的抑制作用。但在软化过程中应力的跌落程度受围压影响不大,这是因为软化过程中,不同围压作用下试样内部的微裂纹均逐渐贯通,并发展成同类型的剪切面,对试样力学性能的削弱大致相同。在试验研究基础上,以微裂纹作为损伤基元,引入受应力状态影响的损伤演化方程(因微裂纹的发展受应力变化影响),建立新的本构模型,通过Abaqus及子程序对新模型进行数值实现。模拟结果与试验结果对比表明,该模型可以有效地描述黏土岩的力学特性。研究成果为黏土岩相关地下工程施工提供了更可靠的理论指导。

关键词: 黏土岩, 软化, 损伤, 数值模拟

Abstract: Demonstrated by a series of triaxial compression tests, the mechanical properties of claystone are related to its stress state. The relationship between them shows that the larger the confining pressure is, the higher the claystone samples’ peak stress is and the later it develops. This is subject to the tendency of microcrack closure within specimens under high confining pressure, suggesting that high confining pressure has certain inhibitory effects on the development of microcracks. Therefore, the peak stress appears in higher magnitude and at a later stage. However, the degree of the stress drop during the softening process is not heavily affected by the variation of confining pressure. The reason is the microcracks within the samples under different confining pressures gradually connect to each other to generate shear planes of similar type, so that the mechanical properties of the specimens are weakened to the same extent. Based on the experimental study, the paper introduces a damage evolution equation considering varying stress states by taking microcrack as the damage element (because the development of microcracks is affected by stress states). Moreover, a new constitutive model is established based on the test results and numerically implemented in Abaqus and its subroutines. Comparisons between the simulation and experimental results demonstrate the model adequacy for effectively describing the mechanical properties of claystone. The study provides theoretical guidance for the engineering construction of underground infrastructure in claystone.

Key words: claystone, softening, damage, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[2] 叶阳, 曾亚武, 杜欣, 孙翰卿, 陈曦, . 球形砾石碰撞损伤破碎三维离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[3] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[4] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[5] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[6] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[7] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[8] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[9] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[10] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[11] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[12] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[13] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[14] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[15] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!