郑西客运专线湿陷性黄土区试验路堤的沉降观测与预测研究

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 220-231.

郑西客运专线湿陷性黄土区试验路堤的沉降观测与预测研究

王小军^{1, 2}，屈耀辉²，魏永梁²，杨印海²，达益正²

1.浙江大学宁波理工学院，浙江宁波 315100；2.中铁西北科学研究院有限公司，兰州 730000

收稿日期:2010-04-13 出版日期:2010-08-10 发布日期:2010-09-09
作者简介:王小军，男，1965年生，教授，硕导，从事岩土工程及地基与路基工程研究与教学。
基金资助:
铁道部科技研究开发计划项目（No. 2005K001-B-2）。

Settlement observation and prediction research of test embankment in collapsible loess area along Zhengzhou-Xi'an passenger dedicated line

WANG Xiao-jun ^{1, 2}, QU Yao-hui², WEI Yong-liang², YANG Yin-hai2, DA Yi-zheng²

1. Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 2. Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., of China Railway Engineering Corporation, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2010-04-13 Online:2010-08-10 Published:2010-09-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

郑西客运专线路堤工后容许沉降量为15 mm，湿陷性黄土区路堤地基处理的沉降控制是关键性技术难题，为此，选择湿陷性黄土代表性地段进行了不同地基处理措施路堤工程沉降观测试验研究。研究结果表明，路堤本体的压缩沉降量只有3 mm，并在路堤竣工后的15 d内趋于稳定，路堤沉降主要由地基沉降控制，而地基沉降则决定于3种不同地基处理措施层以下土层的沉降量大小。在沉降量大小、地基处理和浸水效果方面，22 m深湿陷性土层全部处理的柱锤冲扩桩区段最好，15 m深湿陷性土层的挤密桩区段较好，6 m深湿陷性土层的强夯区段最差，而且采取合理的防排水措施防止坡脚附近积水浸泡非常必要。采用双曲线法、三点法和Asaoka法预测结果的平均值作为路堤的最终沉降量，柱锤冲扩桩区段、挤密桩区段的路堤分别需要恒载预压5个月、8个月便可卸除荷载铺设无碴轨道，强夯区段路堤的预压荷载可能需要持续很长的时间。

关键词: 客运专线, 湿陷性黄土, 地基处理, 路堤, 沉降

Abstract:

The Zhengzhou-Xi'an passenger dedicated line allows 15 mm settlement of embankment after acceptance. The settlement control of ground treatment in collapsible loess is a key technical problem. Therefore, the settlement of an embankment construction on ground treatment with different measures is observed and researched experimentally in a selected area of typical collapsible loess. The results show that the compression settlement of embankment body is only 3 mm and have already stabilized in 15 days after completion of embankment. The embankment settlement is primarily controlled by the foundation settlement which is determined by the settlement of soils below three different kinds of ground treatment layer. A section of pile thrusted-expanded in column-hammer which treats all 22 m depth of collapsible loess is best, a section of cement soil pile which treats 15 m depth of collapsible loess is better, a section of dynamic compaction which treats 6 m depth of collapsible loess is worst in the settlement, ground treatment and immersion effect. It is very essential that the reasonable waterproof and drainage measures are taken to prevent water from immersing the vicinity of slope foot. The average value of results which are predicted by the hyperbolic method, three-point method and Asaoka method is used as the final settlement of embankment. The constant preloading can be removed to lay ballastless track after 5 months in the section of pile thrusted-expanded in column-hammer and after 8 months in the section of cement soil pile. But it may need to continue for a long time in the section of dynamic compaction.

Key words: passenger dedicated line, collapsible loess, ground treatment, embankment, settlement

中图分类号:

U 238

王小军，屈耀辉，魏永梁，杨印海，达益正. 郑西客运专线湿陷性黄土区试验路堤的沉降观测与预测研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 220-231.

WANG Xiao-jun, QU Yao-hui, WEI Yong-liang, YANG Yin-hai, DA Yi-zheng. Settlement observation and prediction research of test embankment in collapsible loess area along Zhengzhou-Xi'an passenger dedicated line[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 220-231.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[3]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[4]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[5]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[6]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[7]	朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[8]	杜文, 王永红, 李利, 朱连臣, 朱浩天, 王有旗, . 双层车站密贴下穿既有隧道案例分析及隧道沉降变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2765-2773.
[9]	黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[10]	张治国, 张瑞, 黄茂松, 宫剑飞, . 基于差异沉降和轴向刚度控制的竖向荷载作用下群桩基础优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2354-2368.
[11]	王胤, 周令新, 杨庆. 基于不规则钙质砂颗粒发展的拖曳力系数模型及其在细观流固耦合数值模拟中应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[12]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[13]	付宏渊, 刘杰, 曾铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[14]	刘成禹, 张翔, 程凯, 陈博文, . 地下工程涌水涌砂诱发的沉降试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 843-851.
[15]	谭国宏, 肖海珠, 杜勋, 胡文军. 大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1113-1120.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed