›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1579-1587.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同温度条件下气体压力升降过程中瓦斯运移规律的试验研究

许 江1, 2,张 敏1, 2,彭守建1, 2,李波波1, 2,武雪峰1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点试验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 复杂煤气层瓦斯抽采国家地方联合工程试验室,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-10 出版日期:2016-06-13 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:许江,男,1960年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.51474040);国家自然科学基金(No.51434003);国家自然科学基金(No.51304255);重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目(No.cstc2013jjB90001)。

Experimental study of migration laws of gas during loading-unloading process at different temperatures

XU Jiang1, 2, ZHANG Min1, 2, PENG Shou-jian1, 2, LI Bo-bo1, 2, WU Xue-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Methane Drainage in Complex Coal Gas Seam, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2014-09-10 Online:2016-06-13 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51474040), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51434003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304255) and Basic and Cutting-edge Research Projects of Chongqing (cstc2013jjB90001).

摘要: 利用自主研发的含瓦斯煤热-流-固耦合三轴伺服渗流装置,对不同温度条件下型煤试件在气体压力升降过程的渗流特性进行了试验研究,以模拟随采深增加引起的地温升高条件下煤的渗透特性。同时,为探讨低渗储层的滑脱效应进行了相同条件下氦气的平行试验。研究结果表明:(1)升压阶段,轴向应变增大,径向应变减小,近似呈线性变化;降压阶段,随气体压力降低,应变呈现出与升压阶段相同的变化趋势。随温度升高,应变随气体压力变化的斜率增大。(2)升压阶段,随气体压力升高,渗透率呈二次抛物线型变化,约在气体压力为3.0 MPa左右到达最小;降压阶段,随气体压力减小,渗透率先略有减小后增大,升压阶段渗透率大于降压阶段渗透率。(3)升压阶段滑脱效应引起的渗透率变化量大于降压阶段的变化量,且滑脱效应所引起的渗透率变化量随气体压力增加呈幂指数函数降低。

关键词: 气体压力, 滑脱效应, 渗透率, 变形

Abstract: Using the self-developed triaxial servo-controlled seepage equipment for thermo-fluid-solid coupling of coal containing methane, a series of tests is conducted on coal samples during the process of gas loading-unloading at different temperatures to simulate the seepage characteristis of coal under the condition of temperature increase induced by increasing depth of mining. Meanwhile, parallel experiments on helium are also carried out to investigate the slippage effect of low permeability coal seam. The experimental results are shown as follows: (1) During the loading process, the axial strain increases and radial strain decreases linearly with the increase of gas pressure. During the unloading process, the strain of coal shows the same trend with the loading. The slope of strain varies with increasing gas pressure and temperature. (2) During the loading process, the permeability of coal shows a quadratic parabola trend with the increase of gas pressure, and it reaches the minimum at about 3.0 MPa. At the early unloading stage, the permeability of coal decreases slowly and then increases with the decrease of gas pressure. The permeability of coal during the loading process is lager than that during the unloading process. (3) Variation of permeability caused by slippage effect during loading process is greater than the amount of unloading process. What’s more, variation of permeability caused by slippage effect declines in an exponential function with the increase of gas pressure.

Key words: gas pressure, slippage effect, permeability, deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TD 821

[1] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[2] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[4] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[5] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[6] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[7] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[8] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[9] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[10] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[11] 王刚, 秦相杰, 江成浩, 张振宇. 温度作用下CT三维重建煤体微观 结构的渗流和变形模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1750-1760.
[12] 王凯兴, 窦林名, 潘一山, OPARIN V N . 块系岩体非协调动力响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1227-1234.
[13] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[14] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[15] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!