岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4360-4368.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1334

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

加筋土挡墙静载模型试验及其力学性能研究

李丽华,石安宁,肖衡林,胡 智,杨俊超,余长道   

  1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院 湖北省生态道路工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-29 出版日期:2018-12-11 发布日期:2018-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 肖衡林,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土方面的研究工作。E-mail: xiao-henglin@163.com E-mail:researchmailbox@163.com
  • 作者简介:李丽华,女,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事加筋土、环境岩土方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51678224,No.51778217);湖北省杰出青年基金项目(No.2018CFA063);湖北省中央指导地方发展专项基金(2018ZYYD005);湖北省教育厅重点项目(No.D20151402);湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(No.T201605)。

Model test and mechanical properties study of reinforced earth retaining wall

LI Li-hua, SHI An-ning, XIAO Heng-lin, HU Zhi, YANG Jun-chao, YU Chang-dao   

  1. Hubei Ecological Road Engineering Research Center, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China
  • Received:2017-06-29 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2018-12-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678224, 51778217), the Hubei Provincial Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (2018CFA063), the Hubei Central Special Fund for Local Science and Technology Development (2018ZYYD005), the Key Project of Hubei Provincial Education Department (D20151402) and the Project of Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientific and Technological Innovation Team in Hubei Universities and Colleges (T201605).

摘要: 为研究加筋土挡墙在墙顶荷载作用下土体受力和变形形态,通过改变筋材层数、筋材长度和替换加筋材料等方式对加筋土挡墙进行了4种工况的模型试验。对4种工况下的加筋土墙体内竖向土压力、墙面水平位移、墙顶竖向位移和筋材应变等进行对比研究。研究表明,挡墙上部竖向土压力增长较快且各层竖向土压力最大值由加载点下部向墙面处移动;墙顶荷载超过130 kPa时,由于不均匀沉降,第5层筋材对应墙面处有向内收缩趋势,墙面水平位移最大值大约在上三分点位置;整个加载阶段,筋材总体应变值增幅不大且远小于筋材设计应变峰值;增加挡墙内筋材层数和增加筋材长度均可提升挡墙各方面性能,但增加筋材层数提高效果要优于增加筋材长度;使用废旧轮胎代替单向格栅进行加筋可有效提高挡墙整体性能,分散超载引起的附加应力,有效减小墙面水平位移和墙顶竖向位移。

关键词: 模型试验, 加筋土挡墙, 土压力, 变形, 沉降, 废旧轮胎

Abstract: Model tests in laboratory were conducted to investigate the behaviors of reinforced earth retaining wall of block face under the loading on the top of the retaining wall. In the model test, four conditions were simulated. The results show that, the vertical earth pressure on the upper part of retaining wall increases rapidly and the maximum vertical earth pressure of each layer moves from the lower part of the loading point to the face of wall. When the load at the top of wall exceeds 130 kPa, due to uneven settlement, the wall surface corresponding to fifth layer of reinforcement tends to shrink inward, the maximum horizontal displacement of wall surface is located in 7/10 of the wall height. In the whole loading stage, the overall strain value of the reinforcement does not increase significantly and the actual strain value of the reinforcement is much smaller than the maximum design strain of the reinforcement. Both increasing the number of the reinforced layers in the retaining wall and increasing the length of reinforcement can improve the performance of the retaining walls. However, the effect of increasing the number of the reinforced layers is better than that of increasing the length of reinforcement. The use of waste tire instead of unidirectional geogrid can effectively improve the overall performance of retaining walls, disperse additional stress caused by overloading, reduce the horizontal displacement of the face of wall and the vertical displacement at the top of the wall.

Key words: model test, reinforced earth retaining wall, earth pressure, deformation, settlement, waste tires

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472.3+4
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[3] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[4] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[5] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[6] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[7] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[8] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[9] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[10] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[11] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[12] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[13] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[14] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[15] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!