岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3289-3299.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2190

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深基坑地连墙支护体系协调变形规律试验研究

陈保国1,闫腾飞1,王程鹏1,宗秋雷2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中国水利水电第七工程局有限公司,四川 成都 610081
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-02 修回日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:陈保国,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下建筑工程方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41602319,No. 51108434);中国地质大学(武汉)教学实验室开放基金(No. SKJ2018114)。

Experimental study on compatible deformation of diaphragm wall support system for deep foundation pit

CHEN Bao-guo1, YAN Teng-fei1, WANG Cheng-peng1, ZONG Qiu-lei2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Sinohydro Bureau 7 Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Revised:2020-05-12 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602319, 51108434??) and the Open Fund for Teaching Laboratory of China University of Geosciences (SKJ2018114?).

摘要: 深基坑地连墙支护体系中局部应力集中问题,以及施工过程中的实际变形与设计值之间往往存在较大差异造成施工风险。通过设计模型试验,采用可伸缩的内支撑体系来解决上述问题。研究了内支撑体系、地连墙和墙后土体之间的协调变形特性;得出了内支撑的轴力、墙后水平土压力、基坑周围地表位移、地连墙的最大变形量等随支撑体系调节方式的变化规律;提出了地连墙支护体系协调变形智能调节方法。研究发现,相同的位移控制条件下,上部支撑伸缩引起的轴力变化量最大,底部支撑伸缩次之,4道支撑同时伸缩时影响最小;但是,支撑伸缩的位置越深,对地表竖向位移的影响范围越大,4道支撑同时伸缩对地表位移的影响范围和幅度大于单独伸缩某一道内支撑;支撑伸长可明显减小地连墙水平位移,但是会导致支撑轴力急剧增大。结果表明,实际工程中并非基坑水平位移控制越严格,支护体系就越安全,而是应合理控制内支撑伸缩长度,加强支撑轴力和位移监测。

关键词: 深基坑, 支护体系, 协调变形, 模型试验

Abstract: The stress concentration in diaphragm wall support system, combined with an intolerable difference between deformation of diaphragm wall occurred during the construction process and predicted by design probably result in large construction risk. The paper solved these problems by model tests in which an adjustable device was set on the support system. The compatible deformation among the support system, the diaphragm wall and the ground soil behind the diaphragm wall were investigated. The variation of the support axial force, the lateral earth pressure on the diaphragm wall, the ground surface settlement around the foundation pit and the maximum deformation of the diaphragm wall with the adjustment mode of supports were obtained. A smart regulation method for compatible deformation of the diaphragm wall support system was proposed. The results show that under a constant displacement condition, the variation of support axial force caused by the adjustment of the upper support is the largest, by the adjustment of the bottom support is secondary, and by the simultaneous adjustment of the four supports is the smallest. However, the influence range of the ground surface displacement increases with the depth of the adjusted support, but the amplitude decreases. The influence range and amplitude of the simultaneous adjustment of the four supports are larger than that of the adjustment of a single support. The lateral displacement of the diaphragm wall can be reduced by the extension of the support, but the axial force of the support will increase sharply. It can be concluded that it is not wise to strictly control the horizontal displacement of foundation pit. Instead, a reasonable adjusted displacement of support and the monitoring of the support axial force and displacement in succession are recommend.

Key words: deep foundation pit, support system, compatible deformation, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476
[1] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[2] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[3] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[4] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[5] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[6] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[7] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[8] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[9] 刘润, 曹添铭, 陈广思, 张海洋, 李成凤. 插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2943-2952.
[10] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
[11] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
[12] 罗易, 张家铭, 周峙, 契霍特金, 米敏, 沈筠, . 降雨-蒸发条件下土体开裂临界 含水率演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2592-2600.
[13] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[14] 邓玮婷, 丁选明, 彭宇, . 珊瑚砂地基中膨胀混凝土桩竖向受压承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2814-2820.
[15] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[3] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[4] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[5] 张建国,张强勇,杨文东,张 欣. 大岗山水电站坝区初始地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3071 -3078 .
[6] 刘 晓,唐辉明,罗红明,陈守义. 对滑坡防治工程相关规范中渗流问题的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .
[7] 孙德安. 非饱和土的水力和力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3217 -3231 .
[8] 朱珍德,李道伟,蒋志坚,刘金辉,杨永杰. 温度循环作用下深埋隧洞围岩细观结构的定量描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3237 -3241 .
[9] 陈善雄,冯美果,许锡昌,陈守义. 某电厂贮灰坝失稳过程及破坏机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3365 -3371 .
[10] 王 威,王水林,汤 华,周平根. 基于三维GIS的滑坡灾害监测预警系统及应用[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3379 -3385 .