岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 3008-3016.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0378

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

变荷载下考虑半透水边界和起始水力坡降的 软土一维固结解析解

陈余1,李传勋1,冯翠霞2   

  1. 1. 江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江 212013;2. 上海申元岩土工程有限公司,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-13 修回日期:2021-08-23 出版日期:2021-11-11 发布日期:2021-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 李传勋,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基处理方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: lichuanxun@yeah.net E-mail: chenyu19960707@yeah.net
  • 作者简介:陈余,男,1996年生,硕士,主要从事地基处理方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878320)

Analytical solution for one-dimensional consolidation of soft soils under a partially permeable boundary condition and a time-dependent loading considering the threshold hydraulic gradient

CHEN Yu1, LI Chuan-xun1, FENG Cui-xia2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. Shanghai Shenyuan Geotechnical Engineering Co., LTD, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2021-05-13 Revised:2021-08-23 Online:2021-11-11 Published:2021-11-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878320).

摘要: 在软土地基顶面铺设的不可压缩垫层对边界排水性能具有一定影响,同时软黏土中渗流偏离Darcy定律的现象对超静孔隙水压力消散的影响已逐渐被人们所熟知。但同时考虑不可压缩垫层与地基土体接触面处形成的半透水边界和起始水力坡降的固结理论却少有报道。建立了变荷载下同时考虑半透水边界和起始水力坡降的一维固结模型,采用特征值法、Laplace变换对所建立的固结模型开展解析求解,分析了固结模型在不同边界条件、起始水力坡降以及加载速率下的固结特性。结果表明:考虑起始水力坡降后,半透水界面参数?(不可压缩层渗透系数和黏土层厚度之积与黏土层渗透系数和不可压缩层厚度之积的比值,其值大小代表排水面透水能力强弱)值越小,孔压消散速率越慢,固结完成所需时间越长;? 值越大,孔压消散速率越快,固结完成时间越短。半透水边界条件下起始水力坡降的无量纲变量R(起始水力坡降、水的重度与土层厚度三者之积除以外荷载)值越大,渗流前锋(移动边界)到达土层底部的时间越长,固结完成时土中超静孔压残留值越大。相同时刻下,按变形定义的土层平均固结度随R值增大而增大,但按孔压定义的土层平均固结度随R值增大而变小。加载速率对考虑起始水力坡降和半透水边界的土层固结性状具有明显影响,加载速率越慢,超静孔隙水压力峰值越小,且达到峰值所需时间越长,但加载速率对最终超静孔压残留值几乎无影响。

关键词: 变荷载, 一维固结, 半透水边界, 起始水力坡降, 解析解

Abstract: The placement of an incompressible cushion on the top of soft soil deposits affects the boundary drainage conditions. It has been well documented in the literature that the seepage through soft clays deviates from Darcy's law, which affects the dissipation of excess pore water pressure. However, the studies on the soil consolidation behavior under the partially permeable boundary condition induced by the incompressible cushion underlain by soil deposits considering the non-Darcian flow with the threshold hydraulic gradient have rarely been reported. In this study, a one-dimensional consolidation model under the partially permeable boundary condition and the time-dependent loading is developed. The effect of the threshold hydraulic gradient on the water flow through the soft soil is taken into account. The analytical solution is derived for the proposed consolidation model based on the eigen value method and Laplace transform. Based on the derived analytical solution, the sensitivity analysis has been conducted for the consolidation behavior under various boundary conditions, threshold hydraulic gradients and loading rates. It indicates that the smaller the partially permeable boundary parameter ? (i.e., the ratio of the product of the coefficient of permeability of the incompressible cushion and the thickness of the clay deposit to the product of the coefficient of permeability of the clay deposit and the thickness of the incompressible cushion, which indicates the permeability of the partially permeable boundary)is, the slower the dissipation of excess pore water pressure and the longer the duration of consolidation process are; the larger ? is, the faster the dissipation of excess pore pressure and the shorter the duration of consolidation process are. The larger the dimensionless variable R (the ratio of the product of the threshold hydraulic gradient, the unit weight of water and the thickness of soil layer to the surcharge) is, the longer the time when the seepage front (i.e., moving boundary) reaches the bottom of soil layer is, and the greater the residual excess pore water pressure at the end of consolidation is. At a given time, the settlement-based average degree of consolidation increases with an increase in the dimensionless variable R. On the contrary, the excess pore water pressure-based average consolidation degree decreases as the dimensionless variable R increases. The loading rate significantly influences the consolidation behavior of soils with threshold hydraulic gradient under the partially permeable boundary condition. It is found that the slower the loading is, the lower the peak value of excess pore water pressure is, and the longer the time it takes to reach its peak is. However, the loading rate has negligible influence on the residual excess pore water pressure.

Key words: time-dependent loading, one-dimensional consolidation, partially permeable boundary, threshold hydraulic gradient, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 邱金伟, 权全, 刘军, 童军, 胡波, . 考虑非等温环境下污染物在黏土中的运移解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 423-431.
[2] 赵爽, 余俊, 刘新源, 胡钟伟. 悬臂式刚性墙动力响应解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 152-159.
[3] 王祖贤, 施成华, 刘建文. 非对称推力作用下盾构隧道附加响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2449-2460.
[4] 卢一为, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 郑长杰, . 均匀黏弹性地基中X形桩纵向振动 响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2472-2479.
[5] 仇超, 李传勋, 李红军, . 单级等速加载下高压缩性软土 非线性大应变固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2195-2206.
[6] 林伟岸, 江文豪, 詹良通. 考虑真空加载过程及堆载随时间变化下 砂井地基的普遍固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1828-1838.
[7] 秦爱芳, 江良华, 许薇芳, 梅国雄, . 连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1345-1354.
[8] 凌道盛, 赵天浩, 钮家军, 朱松, 单振东, . 混合非齐次边界下非饱和土一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
[9] 周凤玺, 周志雄, 柳鸿博, . 非均匀地基与均匀地基解答之间的相似关系: 弹性波速[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 892-898.
[10] 刘建, 乔兰, 李庆文, 李远, 赵国彦, . 分布载荷加载下中心直裂纹巴西圆盘的 断裂参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2987-2996.
[11] 朱赛男, 李伟华, LEE Vincent W, 赵成刚, . 平面P1波斜入射下海底洞室地震响应解析分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 93-103.
[12] 黄朝煊, 袁文喜, 胡国杰, . 成层软土地基预固结处理后桩基水平 承载力估算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 113-124.
[13] 叶梓, 艾智勇, . 变荷载下层状非饱和土地基全耦合固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 135-142.
[14] 冯庆高, 蔡兵华, 冯晓腊, 袁祥, . 侧向有限越流承压含水层中非完整井非 稳定流模型及解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 168-176.
[15] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[2] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[3] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[4] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[5] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[6] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[7] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[8] 丁洲祥,仇玉良,李 涛. 双面排水非线性固结超静孔压的非对称性解析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1829 -1838 .
[9] 田堪良 ,张慧莉 ,马 俊 . 基于强度条件的黄土结构性静力试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1993 -1999 .
[10] 费 康 ,王军军 ,陈 毅 . 桩承式路堤土拱效应简化分析方法[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2408 -2414 .