岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3451-3466.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0557

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应模型试验 及颗粒流数值模拟研究

崔蓬勃1, 2, 3,朱永全1, 3,刘勇1, 3,朱正国1, 3, 4,潘英东5   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043;2. 江苏建筑职业技术学院 交通工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116;3. 石家庄铁道大学 交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043;4. 中国铁道科学研究院 高速铁路轨道技术国家重点实验室,北京100081;5. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 修回日期:2021-07-12 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 朱永全,男,1960年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下与隧道研究工作。E-mail: 2217766232@qq.com E-mail: cuipengbo.cool@163.com
  • 作者简介:崔蓬勃,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下与隧道研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51778380);江苏省建设系统科技项目(No.2020ZD28);高速铁路轨道技术国家重点实验室开放基金项目(No.2019YJ196)

Model test and particle flow numerical simulation of soil arch effect for unsaturated sandy soil tunnel

CUI Peng-bo1, 2, 3, ZHU Yong-quan1, 3, LIU Yong1, 3, ZHU Zheng-guo1, 3, 4, PAN Ying-dong5   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. School of Transportation Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 4. State Key Laboratory for Track Technology of High-Speed Railway, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Revised:2021-07-12 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51778380), the Science and Technology Research Project of Construction System of Jiangsu Province(2020ZD28) and the State Key Laboratory for Track Technology of High-speed Railway(2019YJ196).

摘要: 非饱和砂土基质吸力引起的表观黏聚力使其力学性质与干砂差异较大,为研究非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应,进行了不同含水率及埋深条件的Trapdoor试验,通过分析挡板下落过程中砂土破坏模式及土压力变化规律,揭示了不同工况土拱演化的时变特征,阐述了含水率及埋深对土拱效应的影响,同时基于大主应力迹线圆弧拱理论对挡板上方土压力分布模式进行了理论分析,并考虑粒间吸力作用基于PFC线性滚动阻力黏结模型,进行了离散元数值模拟,从细观角度对不同工况土拱效应进行了分析。结果表明:干砂工况破坏模式由三角形迅速发展为梯形,非饱和工况破坏模式为三角形且夹角与含水率相关;土压力呈三阶段变化,干砂时土压力降到极值后出现回升;非饱和工况土压力极值较干砂大幅减少,含水率较大时土压力受埋深影响较小,且松动区边缘出现裂缝,局部坍塌后形成自然拱;数值模拟表明,随挡板下落,主应力方向发生明显偏转,接触力链为由松动区向稳定区呈由弱到强结构,对模型试验及数值模拟土压力进行归一化处理,土压力分布与理论分析一致。干砂工况孔隙率与土压力规律一致,在含水工况出现裂缝处孔隙率快速增大,同时接触组构随含水率变化明显。

关键词: 土拱效应, 非饱和砂土, 破坏模式, 土压力, 颗粒流

Abstract: The apparent cohesion caused by matric suction makes the mechanical properties of unsaturated sand significantly different from those of dry sand. In order to study the soil arching effect of the unsaturated sand tunnel, trapdoor tests with different water contents and buried depths were carried out. The time-varying characteristics of soil arching evolution under different working conditions were revealed by analyzing the failure mode of sand and the change law of earth pressure in the process of baffle falling, and the influence of water content and buried depth on soil arching effect was expounded. Meanwhile, the distribution mode of earth pressure above the baffle was analyzed based on the arc arch theory of large principal stress trace and considering the suction between particles. The discrete element numerical simulation was carried out based on PFC (particle flow code) adhesive rolling resistance linear model, and the soil arching effect under different working conditions was analyzed from the micro perspective. The results show that the failure mode of dry sand develops rapidly from triangle to trapezoid, and the failure mode of unsaturated sand is triangle and related to water content. The earth pressure changes in three stages and the earth pressure decreases to the extreme value and then rises when the sand is dry. The extreme value of soil pressure in the unsaturated conditions is greatly reduced compared with that of dry sand. The soil pressure is less affected by the burial depth when the water content is larger. Cracks appear at the edge of the loosened area, and natural arch is formed after the local collapse. The numerical simulation shows that with the baffle falling, the direction of principal stress deflects obviously. The contact force chain changes from the loose area to the stable area from weak to strong. The soil pressure distribution of model test and numerical simulation is consistent with the theoretical analysis. The results show that the porosity of dry sand is consistent with the soil pressure, and the porosity increases rapidly when the cracks appear in the water bearing condition, while the contact fabric changes obviously with the water content.

Key words: soil arching effect, unsaturated sand, failure mode, soil pressure, particle flow code

中图分类号: 

  • TU441
[1] 张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 黄展军, 何小辉, . 基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有 限土体主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.
[2] 李地元, 高飞红, 刘 濛, 马金银. 动静组合加载下含孔洞层状砂岩破坏机制探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2127-2140.
[3] 徐华, 周廷宇, 王歆宇, 张杰, 张小波, 刘雨辰, . 川藏铁路红层改良路基填料压缩试验 与颗粒流模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2259-2268.
[4] 齐飞飞, 张科, 谢建斌, . 基于DIC技术的含不同节理密度类岩石试件 破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1669-1680.
[5] 李欣慰, 姚直书, 黄献文, 刘之喜, 赵翔, 穆克汉, . 循环加卸载下砂岩变形破坏特征与能量演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1693-1704.
[6] 刘新荣, 许彬, 周小涵, 谢应坤, 何春梅, 黄俊辉, . 软弱层峰前循环剪切宏细观累积损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1291-1303.
[7] 张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性 及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[8] 朱晟, 张远, 加力别克·阿哈力别克, 喻建清, 何兆升, . 基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[9] 石峰, 卢坤林, 尹志凯. 平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 735-745.
[10] 王力, 李高, 陈勇, 谭建民, 王世梅, 郭飞, . 赣南地区人工切坡降雨致灾机制现场模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 846-854.
[11] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[12] 侯天顺, 杨凯旋. 挡土墙后EPS颗粒混合轻量土填料静止土压力 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3249-3259.
[13] 张恒志, 徐长节, 梁禄钜, 侯世磊, 范润东, 冯国辉, . RB模式下刚性挡墙有限土体主动土压力的 离散元模拟与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2895-2907.
[14] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[15] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .