岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 520-530.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0198

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析

黄炜1,简文彬1, 2,杨坚1,豆红强1,罗金妹3   

  1. 1. 福州大学 紫金地质与矿业学院 岩土与地质工程系,福建 福州 350116; 2. 福州大学 福建省地质灾害重点实验室,福建 福州 350003;3. 中化地质矿山总局福建地质勘查院,福建 福州 350013
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-22 接受日期:2022-05-06 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 简文彬,男,1963年生,博士研究生,教授,主要从事边坡工程、地质灾害及其防治、岩土工程防灾减灾等方面的研究。E-mail:jwb@fzu.edu.cn E-mail:1062700713@qq.com
  • 作者简介:黄炜,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,助理工程师,主要从事边坡工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41861134011);中化地质矿山总局科技创新团队基金项目(No. 201806291)。

Prototype test and load transfer characteristic analysis of multi-disk anchor rod

HUANG Wei1, JIAN Wen-bin1, 2, YANG Jian1, DOU Hong-qiang1, LUO Jin-mei3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China; 3. Fujian Geological Exploration Institute of Geology and Mine Bureau, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China
  • Received:2022-02-22 Accepted:2022-05-06 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41861134011) and the Science and Technology Innovation Team Fund Project of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau(201806291).

摘要: 多支盘锚杆是新近研发的新型锚固结构,与普通锚杆相比具有优良的工程特性。在多支盘锚杆室内模型试验研究的基础上,通过极限平衡理论推导出多支盘锚杆极限承载力理论计算公式,计算模型结果与室内实测数据基本一致,验证了计算公式的有效性。为了进一步掌握多支盘锚杆的荷载传递特性,开展了现场边坡锚固原型试验,利用现场多支盘锚杆拉拔测试所得数据研究了多支盘锚杆的支盘直径、支盘间距和支盘个数对多支盘锚杆极限承载力和变形控制能力的影响。试验结果表明:在粉质黏土中,当支盘间距大于等于4倍支盘直径时,可认为各支盘能独立工作,充分发挥多支盘锚杆的承载力;在相同条件下,与普通锚杆相比,随着多支盘锚杆的支盘直径从300 mm增大到500 mm以及支盘个数从1个增加到3个,多支盘锚杆的抗拔承载力提高非常明显,其变形控制能力也大幅度增强;多支盘锚杆的轴力传递曲线在支盘位置发生突变,呈陡降型,充分体现支盘在抗拔方面的贡献作用。该研究成果为多支盘锚杆的工程应用奠定了良好的理论基础。

关键词: 多支盘锚杆, 极限承载力, 拉拔试验, 荷载传递, 原型试验

Abstract: Multi-disk anchor rod is a newly developed anchoring structure, which has excellent engineering characteristics compared with ordinary anchor rod. On the basis of the laboratory model test research of the multi-disk anchor, a theoretical calculation formula for the ultimate bearing capacity of the multi-disk anchor is deduced through the limit equilibrium theory. It’s validity is verified by the correspondence between the calculation result and the measured data. To further grasp the load transfer characteristics of the multi-disk anchor, an on-site slope anchoring prototype test is carried out. The data obtained from the on-site multi-disk anchor pull-out test are used to study the influence of the diameter of support disks, the spacing of support disks and the number of support disks on the ultimate bearing capacity and deformation control ability of multi-disk anchors. The test results show that in silty clay, when the distance between the support disks is greater than or equal to 4 times the diameter of the support disks, it can be considered that each support disk can work independently, giving full play to the bearing capacity of the multi-disk anchor; under the same conditions, compared with ordinary bolts, as the disk diameter increases from 300 mm to 500 mm and the number of disks increases from 1 to 3, the pull-out capacity of the multi-disk anchor increases significantly, and its deformation control ability is also greatly enhanced. The test results also show that the axial force transmission curve of the multi-disk anchor rod has a sudden change at the position of the support disk, presenting a steep drop, which fully reflects the contribution of the support disk in the uplift resistance. The research results have laid a good theoretical foundation for the engineering application of multi-disk anchor rods.

Key words: multi-disk anchor rod, ultimate bearing capacity, pull-out tests, load transfer, prototype test

中图分类号: 

  • U 418.5
[1] 钟紫蓝, 韩春堂, 李锦强, 赵鑫, 缪惠全. 浅埋管道水平横向作用下砂土极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 95-103.
[2] 周杨, 陈永辉, 孔纲强, 陈龙, 陈庚. 路堤荷载下浅层就地固化联合管桩复合地基 桩−土应力比及沉降计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 688-696.
[3] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[4] 王家全, 祁航翔, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于数字图像分析的土工合成材料加筋砂土拉拔试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3259-3269.
[5] 屈春来, 付迪, 刘世伟, 冷先伦, 李建贺, 孙熇远. 非均质成层边坡极限承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2923-2932.
[6] 冯忠居, 江冠, 赵瑞欣, 龙厚胜, 王政斌, 张正旭, . 基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[7] 晏青, 赵均海, 张常光. 基于统一强度理论的临坡加筋地基极限承载力新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1587-1600.
[8] 陈成, 段永达, 芮瑞, 汪伦. 基于拉拔试验和离散元模拟的单、双层土工 格栅加固道砟的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 954-962.
[9] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[10] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[11] 冯衡, 高斐略, 刘观仕, 高彬, 肖飞, 曾二贤, . 风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3328-3334.
[12] 宫跃航, 李明宝, 郑俊杰, . 三角形布桩下桩承式加筋路堤荷载传递效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3051-3058.
[13] 林志, 胡伟, 赵璞, 陈秋南, 贺建清, 陈洁, 史旦达, . 砂土中平板圆锚倾斜拉拔承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3059-3068.
[14] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[15] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .