岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 235-244.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0022

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

酒精湿化法调配压实膨润土缓冲回填材料含水率研究

彭宇1, 2,张虎元1,周光平1,谭煜1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 香港理工大学 土木与环境工程学院,香港
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-09 接受日期:2023-03-23 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 张虎元,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事高放废物缓冲回填材料的研究工作。E-mail: zhanghuyuan@lzu.edu.cn E-mail: yupeng@polyu.edu.hk
  • 作者简介:彭宇,男,1992年生,博士,博士后,主要从事废物缓冲回填材料及土与结构相互作用方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 41972265)

Research on the alcohol method to adjust water content of compacted bentonite as buffer/backfill material

PENG Yu1, 2, ZHANG Hu-yuan1, ZHOU Guang-ping1, TAN Yu1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2023-01-09 Accepted:2023-03-23 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972265).

摘要: 压实膨润土砌块在我国高放射性废物处置中发挥着缓冲回填工程屏障的作用。然而,膨润土材料塑性极强,水分极易拌和不均,易导致压实砌块干缩开裂,显著降低了砌块质量。提出一种采用酒精代替纯水来湿化膨润土的新方法,以提高压实膨润土质量。对比喷水法,酒精湿化法中酒精浓度设计在5%~35%间。通过分析膨润土与酒精混合物的混合效率、黏附质量损失率、混合物中团聚体的含量、压实样干缩前后强度、干缩裂纹规律、干燥效率、膨胀性等指标综合评价酒精湿化压实膨润土样的适用性。试验结果表明:在相同含液率情况下,随酒精浓度增大,所得膨润土样的混合效率明显提高,黏附质量损失率及团聚体含量明显降低;压实样内团聚体与干缩裂纹及试样质量间具有较好对应关系。此外,酒精湿化法所得压实样在压实方向密度分布更均匀,干缩裂纹数量及宽度明显变小,风干试样剪切强度及膨胀性均与加纯水试样较为接近,压实样均匀性与完整性明显提高。新方法及相关成果可供我国高放废物缓冲回填砌块制备参考。

关键词: 压实膨润土, 缓冲回填材料, 酒精湿化法, 含水率, 团聚体

Abstract: Compacted bentonite is a crucial material used in high-level waste engineering barriers as a buffer/backfill material. However, the high plasticity of bentonite and uneven distribution of water can result in drying shrinkage of the compacted bentonite, which negatively impacts the quality of buffer/backfill blocks. To address this issue, a new method called the alcohol method has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional water spray method. In the alcohol method, the ethanol content ranges from 5% to 35%, unlike the water spray method. Several factors were considered to evaluate the feasibility of the alcohol method in adjusting the water content of compacted bentonite. These factors included mixing efficiency, mass loss rate, agglomerate content, strength, shrinkage cracks of compacted samples, drying efficiency, and expansibility. The results demonstrated that as the ethanol content increased, at the same liquid content the mixing efficiency significantly improved, while the mass loss rate and agglomerate content decreased noticeably. Relationships between agglomerates, dry-shrinkage cracks, and the quality of compacted samples were also observed. The compacted samples produced using the alcohol method exhibited more homogeneous soil density in the compacted direction and significantly reduced dry-shrinkage cracks compared to samples produced using the water spray method. Additionally, the shear strength and expansion characteristics of air-dried samples adjusted by the alcohol method were similar to those adjusted by the water spray method. The alcohol method, along with the findings from this study, provides valuable insights for the production of buffer/backfill materials in high-level waste disposal.

Key words: bentonite, buffer/backfill material, alcohol method, water content, agglomerates

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 张勇敢, 鲁洋, 刘斯宏, 田金博, 张思钰, 方斌昕. 土工袋抑制膨胀土冻胀性能试验及机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 759-768.
[2] 刘德仁, 张转军, 王旭, 张艳丰, 安政山, 金芯, . 水蒸汽增湿重塑非饱和黄土地基现场应用参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 73-82.
[3] 刘杰锋, 李飒, 段贵娟, 王奕霖, . 稳态剪切条件下中国南海软黏土的相态转变特性及流变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 341-349.
[4] 瞿茹, 朱长歧, 刘海峰, 王天民, 马成昊, 王星, . 珊瑚砂界限干密度确定方法的比较研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 461-475.
[5] 冉宇玲, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 李雪梅, 樊恒辉, 杨秀娟, . 基于频域反射的细粒土压实度检测方法与误差评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2458-2470.
[6] 张延杰, 何萌, 宋萌, 曹立, 赵海涛, 李梅. 富水砂卵石地层力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1739-1747.
[7] 孙晓明, 姜铭, 王新波, 臧金诚, 高祥, 缪澄宇, . 万福煤矿不同含水率砂岩蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 624-636.
[8] 彭赟, 胡明鉴, 阿颖, 王雪晴, . 珊瑚砂热物理参数测试与预测模型对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 884-895.
[9] 王奕霖, 李飒, 段贵娟, 李怀亮, 赵福臣. 深海超软土动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3261-3271.
[10] 郎瑞卿, 裴璐熹, 孙立强, 周龙, 李恒. 新拌不同液限淤泥固化土流动性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2789-2797.
[11] 肖涵, 董超强, 章荣军, 陆展, 郑俊杰. 生石灰对理化复合法处理淤泥浆效率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 214-222.
[12] 汤华, 严松, 杨兴洪, 吴振君, . 差异含水率下全风化混合花岗岩抗剪强度 与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 55-66.
[13] 张磊, 田苗苗, 卢硕, 李明雪, 李菁华, . 不同含水率煤体液氮致裂渗透率变化规律 及应力敏感性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 107-116.
[14] 刘杰, 崔瑜瑜, 卢正, 姚海林, . 分散土分散性影响因素及其判别方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 237-244.
[15] 潘振辉, 肖涛, 李萍, . 压实度与制样含水率对压实黄土微结 构及水力特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 357-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[3] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[4] 颜天佑,李同春,赵兰浩,季薇薇. 三维边坡稳定分析的有限元弹塑性迭代解法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3102 -3108 .
[5] 赵明华,刘小平,黄立葵. 降雨作用下路基裂隙渗流分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3122 -3126 .
[6] 定培中,周 密,张 伟. 混凝土浇筑施工对穿黄隧洞衬砌垫层渗透性影响试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3159 -3162 .
[7] 钟佳玉,郑永来,倪 寅. 波浪作用下砂质海床孔隙水压力的响应规律实验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3188 -3193 .
[8] 祝云华,刘新荣,舒志乐. 对“‘深埋隧道开挖围岩失稳突变模型研究’讨论”的答复[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3215 -3216 .
[9] 孙德安. 非饱和土的水力和力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3217 -3231 .
[10] 朱珍德,李道伟,蒋志坚,刘金辉,杨永杰. 温度循环作用下深埋隧洞围岩细观结构的定量描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3237 -3241 .