考虑幂函数渗透压缩变化的双层砂井地基固结性状

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 3117-3126.

考虑幂函数渗透压缩变化的双层砂井地基固结性状

张明^{1, 2}，王威³，刘起霞⁴，赵有明²

1. 河南工程学院土木工程学院，郑州 451191；2. 中国铁道科学研究院，北京 100081； 3. 北京工业大学抗震减灾研究所，北京 100124；4. 河南工业大学土木建筑学院，郑州 450001

收稿日期:2013-06-18 出版日期:2013-11-09 发布日期:2013-11-11
作者简介:张明，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事软土固结理论、地基处理数值计算与方法研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51208017)；河南工程学院博士基金项目(No. D2012007)。

Consolidation behaviors of double-layered vertical drains ground considering power function permeability and compressibility variation

ZHANG Ming^{1, 2}，WANG Wei³，LIU Qi-xia⁴，ZHAO You-ming²

1. College of Civil Engineering, Henan Institute of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China; 2. China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijng 100124, China; 4. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received:2013-06-18 Online:2013-11-09 Published:2013-11-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用Barron轴对称固结及大变形固结问题的某些简化与假定，推导建立了砂井地基大变形固结控制方程，利用建立的双层砂井地基大变形固结方程及编制的计算程序，通过引入软土渗透系数、有效应力与孔隙比之间的幂函数关系k =ced与e=a( )b，对瞬时加载下双层砂井地基固结性状进行算例计算。结果表明：（1）双层软土幂函数渗透关系及压缩关系中诸参数对双层砂井地基固结性状有重要影响：随着两层软土幂函数渗透关系中参数c1、c2的增加（渗透性增加）、或幂函数压缩关系中参数a1、a2的增加，各土层水平径向与竖向孔隙比减小更快，沉降发展速率与超静孔压消散速率也相应增加，且沉降发展速率快于孔压消散速率。（2）两层土在分界面处的孔隙比及平均超静孔压均出现明显的突变，将沿深度分布曲线分成形状不同的两段，表现出不同的固结性状。

关键词: 土力学, 大变形固结, 双层砂井地基, 软土, 幂函数渗透关系, 幂函数压缩关系

Abstract: Based on some simplification and assumption of one-dimensional finite-strain consolidation theory and Barron axisymmetric consolidation theory, a finite-strain consolidation governing equation for vertical drains ground is established. Based on the finite-strain consolidation equation for double-layered vertical drains in soft soil and the computing program in some literatures, the power function relationships of permeability coefficient-void ratio k=ced and effective stress-void ratio e=a( )b for soft soil are introduced; and some examples calculation of consolidation behaviors of double-layered vertical drains ground are carried out under instantaneous loading. The obtained results show that: (1) Some important influence on the consolidation behaviors of double-layered vertical drains ground of various parameters in power function permeability and compressibility relationships for double-layered soft clay soil are as follows. With the increase of parameters c1, c2 of power function permeability relationship (the increase of permeability), or parameters a1, a2 of power function compressibility relationship for soft soil, the void ratios in the radial and vertical directions decrease faster; and the dissipation velocity of excess pore water pressure and the settlement rate are also accelerated; the settlement development rate is faster than the dissipation velocity of excess pore water pressure. (2) The void ratio and average excess pore water pressure at the interface of double-layered soft soil present significant mutation, of which the distribution curve along the depth is divided into two sections with different consolidation behaviors.

Key words: soil mechanics, finite-strain consolidation, double-layered vertical drains ground, soft soil, power function permeability relationship, power function compressibility relationship

中图分类号:

TU 447

张明，王威，刘起霞，赵有明 . 考虑幂函数渗透压缩变化的双层砂井地基固结性状[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3117-3126.

ZHANG Ming ，WANG Wei ，LIU Qi-xia ，ZHAO You-ming . Consolidation behaviors of double-layered vertical drains ground considering power function permeability and compressibility variation[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3117-3126.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[3]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[4]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[5]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[6]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[7]	叶观宝, 郑文强, 张振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[8]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[9]	张奎, 赵成刚, 李伟华. 海底软土层对海洋地基场地动力响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[10]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[11]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[12]	王丽琴, 邵生俊, 王帅, 赵聪, 石鹏鑫, 周彪, . 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1076-1084.
[13]	杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[14]	周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[15]	杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed