考虑参数和模型不确定性的基桩正常使用极限状态可靠度分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3317-3321.

考虑参数和模型不确定性的基桩正常使用极限状态可靠度分析

边晓亚¹，郑俊杰¹，徐志军²

1.华中科技大学岩土与地下工程研究所，武汉 430074；2.河南工业大学土木建筑学院，郑州 450052

收稿日期:2013-07-24 出版日期:2014-11-11 发布日期:2014-12-10
通讯作者: 郑俊杰，男，1967年生，博士研究生，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程与隧道工程方面的教学、科研与技术咨询工作。 E-mail: zhengjj@hust.edu.cn E-mail: bianxy@hust.edu.cn
作者简介:边晓亚，男，1986年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土工程可靠度方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 51278216）；河南工业大学高层次人才基金（No. 2013BS010）。

Reliability analysis of serviceability limit state of foundation piles considering uncertainties of parameter and model

BIAN Xiao-ya¹, ZHENG Jun-jie¹, XU Zhi-jun²

1. Institute of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450052, China

Received:2013-07-24 Online:2014-11-11 Published:2014-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑承载力计算模型和荷载不确定性，利用可靠度分析方法和概率统计理论，推导出承载能力极限状态（ULS）和正常使用极限状态（SLS）下可靠度指标的计算公式，给出了两种极限状态下可靠度指标间的线性关系式，研究了桩顶容许沉降随机性对正常使用极限状态可靠度分析结果的影响。研究结果表明，土体类别和桩型对正常使用极限状态模型因子影响很小；正常使用极限状态下基桩可靠度指标随承载力计算模型和荷载不确定性的增大而减小，但减小幅度逐渐降低，且可靠度指标总变化量不大，工程应用中可忽略承载力计算模型和荷载不确定性在可靠度分析中的影响；随机性对正常使用极限状态可靠性分析结果的影响很大，随的增加，正常使用极限状态模型因子和可靠度指标逐渐增大，而模型因子变异性逐渐减小，但桩本身性质并没有任何改变，只是所允许的沉降条件不同。研究结果可为规范修订和工程应用提供参考。

关键词: 桩, 可靠度, 承载能力极限状态, 正常使用极限状态, 容许沉降

Abstract: Taking into account the uncertainties of the calculation model of bearing capacity and the load, with the reliability analysis method and the theory of probability and statistics, the calculation formulas of reliability indices for ultimate limit state (ULS) and serviceability limit state (SLS) are obtained respectively. Meanwhile, the linear relationship between reliability indices for ULS and SLS is presented. Finally, it is studied that the impact of stochastic behaviors of limiting tolerable settlement of pile head ( ) on reliability analysis for SLS. The following conclusions can be drawn from this study. First, the influences of soil type and pile type on the model factor for SLS are slight. Second, the reliability index for SLS decreases with an increase of the uncertainties from the bearing capacity calculation model and the load, although the decrease rate gradually diminishes. And the total variation in the reliability index for SLS is limited, which means that it is reasonable to ignore the influences of the uncertainties from the bearing capacity calculation model and the load on the reliability analysis for SLS in engineering practice. Third, the stochastic behaviors of have significant effect on reliability analysis for SLS. The model factor and reliability index for SLS both increase with an increase of . However, the variability of model factor for SLS decreases with increase of . The appearance of these conclusions is simply because the requirements of are different, but is not the result that the pile own properties have run into some changes. The research results would provide a reference for code amendment and engineering applications.

Key words: pile, reliability, ultimate limit state (SLS), serviceability limit state, limiting tolerable settlement

中图分类号:

TU 473

边晓亚，郑俊杰，徐志军，. 考虑参数和模型不确定性的基桩正常使用极限状态可靠度分析[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3317-3321.

BIAN Xiao-ya , ZHENG Jun-jie , XU Zhi-jun，. Reliability analysis of serviceability limit state of foundation piles considering uncertainties of parameter and model [J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3317-3321.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3]	吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[4]	黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[5]	邓涛, 林聪煜, 柳志鹏, 黄明, 陈文菁, . 大位移条件下水平受荷单桩的简明弹塑性计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[6]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[7]	孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[8]	秦伟, 戴国亮, 马李志, 裴铭海, 王磊, 朱光耀, 高博, . 珊瑚礁地层中PHC桩原位静载试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 381-389.
[9]	叶观宝, 郑文强, 张振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[10]	谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[11]	唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[12]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[13]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[14]	陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[15]	吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed