让压型锚索箱梁支护系统组合构件耦合性能分析及应用

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 3374-3384.

让压型锚索箱梁支护系统组合构件耦合性能分析及应用

王琦^{1, 2}，李术才¹，李为腾¹，李智¹，江贝¹，苗素军²，李海燕¹，王德超¹，王洪涛¹

1. 山东大学岩土与结构工程研究中心，济南 250061；2. 兖矿集团有限公司博士后科研工作站，山东邹城 273500

收稿日期:2011-11-14 出版日期:2012-11-12 发布日期:2012-11-14
作者简介:王琦，男，1983年生，博士，讲师，主要从事地下工程支护及模型试验方面的研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(No. 51209127)；教育部博士点基金(No. 20110131110030)；山东省自然科学基金面上项目 (No. ZR2009FM009)。

Analysis of combination components coupling of pressure relief anchor box beam support system and application

WANG Qi^{1, 2}，LI Shu-cai¹，LI Wei-teng¹，LI Zhi¹，JIANG Bei¹，MIAO Su-jun²， LI Hai-yan¹，WANG De-chao¹，WANG Hong-tao¹

1. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering , Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China; 2. Post-Doctoral Scientific Research Station, Yankuang Group Company Limited, Zoucheng, Shandong 273500, China

Received:2011-11-14 Online:2012-11-12 Published:2012-11-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对锚索梁支护及组合构件耦合支护研究现状进行了总结分析，指出锚索梁支护系统组合构件耦合支护研究的必要性和意义。以“先控后让再抗”支护理念为指导，研发出高强让压型锚索箱梁支护系统。通过层次分析法得到支护系统各构件权重值，提出了支护系统构件整体性能利用率、耦合效率和围岩控制效果3个指标，进行的13种数值试验对比方案结果表明：Ⅱ12c+? 22锚索、Ⅱ12b+? 22锚索和Ⅱ12a+? 17.8锚索方案对应的支护系统均具有较高的耦合效率；锚索型号对支护系统耦合效率具有较为显著的影响；增大预紧力有助于进一步提高构件整体利用率、耦合效率，改善围岩控制效果。设计制作了测力箱梁，选择Ⅱ12b+? 22锚索方案对应的锚索梁支护系统进行了现场试验，测站监测结果显示，支护系统在掘巷期间的整体性能利用率为54.51%，构件耦合效率达到75.61%，系统各构件达到了同步承载的效果，巷道顶板沉降量和两帮移近量分别为148 mm和180 mm，较好地控制了巷道围岩变形。

关键词: 箱型支护梁, 锚索让压环, 组合构件, 耦合性能, 数值试验, 现场试验

Abstract: The current research situations of anchor beam support system and composite members coupling support are summarized; and the necessity and significance of coupling support research of composite members in anchor beam support system are also researched. High strength pressure relief anchor box beam support system is developed, which is guided by the support idea: controlling at first, pressure yielding behind and then resistance. The coupling efficiency weights of composite members are obtained through the method of analytic hierarchy process; and utilization ratio of whole performance, coupling efficiency and control effect of surrounding rock of members in support system are put forward. The results of thirteen numerical test schemes show that coupling efficiency of Ⅱ12c+? 22 cable, Ⅱ12b+? 22 cable and Ⅱ12a+? 17.8 cable support system are good; the coupling efficiency of support system is markedly affected by cable type; increasing prestressing force is good for raising whole utilization ratio and coupling efficiency, and improving control effect of surrounding rock. The force measuring anchor box beams are designed and made; and the Ⅱ12b+? 22 anchor beam support system is applied to field test. Monitoring results show that the utilization ratio of whole performance is 54.51%; the coupling efficiency of members is 75.61%; members of system keep pace with each other in load supporting; roof settlement in coal roadway is 148 mm and walls displacement of roadway is 180 mm; and surrouding rock deformation is controlled well during roadway excavation.

Key words: box supporting beam, anchor yielding link, composite members, coupling efficiency, numerical test, field test

中图分类号:

TD 313

王琦，李术才，李为腾，李智，江贝，. 让压型锚索箱梁支护系统组合构件耦合性能分析及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3374-3384.

WANG Qi ，LI Shu-cai ，LI Wei-teng ，LI Zhi ，JIANG Bei ，MIAO Su-jun ，. Analysis of combination components coupling of pressure relief anchor box beam support system and application[J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3374-3384.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	侯公羽, 谢冰冰, 韩育琛, 胡涛, 李子祥, 杨兴昆, 周天赐, 肖海林, . 分布埋入式光纤与隧道衬砌耦合性能试验及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 714-726.
[2]	陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[3]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[4]	吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[5]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[6]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[7]	信亚雯, 周志芳, 马筠, 李鸣威, 陈朦, 汪姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[8]	李驰, 王硕, 王燕星, 高瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[9]	任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[10]	袁亮, 刘业娇, 田志超, 唐春安, 薛俊华, 段昌瑞, 张寒, . 地面垂直钻孔预抽特厚煤层瓦斯数值试验与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 370-378.
[11]	崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[12]	王炳龙，梅祯，肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[13]	郭飞，陶连金，孔恒，马红红，张丽丽，张新全,. 兰州砂卵石地层盾构施工振动传播及衰减特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3377-3384.
[14]	喻豪俊，彭社琴，赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[15]	李清川，李术才，王汉鹏，张红军，张冰，张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed