›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 2145-2150.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.08.003

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

南宁膨胀土的体积含水率-等效介电常数关系

吕海波1, 2,蒋文宇1,赵艳林1, 2,曾召田1, 2   

  1. 1.广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004;2.桂林理工大学 广西岩土力学与工程重点实验室,广西 桂林 541004
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-09 出版日期:2016-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 赵艳林,男,1958年生,博士,教授,主要从事土与结构相互作用方面的研究工作。E-mail:zhaoyanlin@gxu.edu.cn E-mail:lhb@glut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吕海波,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土的工程性质方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51169005,No. 41272358);广西自然科学基金创新研究团队项目(No. 2012GXNSFGA060001)。

Relationship between volumetric water content and effective dielectric permittivity of Nanning expansive soil

LÜ Hai-bo1, 2, JIANG Wen-yu1, ZHAO Yan-lin1, 2, ZENG Zhao-tian1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • Received:2014-09-09 Online:2016-08-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51169005 and 41272358), the Innovation Research Team Fund for Natural Science of Guangxi(2012GXNSFGA060001).

摘要: 体积含水率-介电常数关系是时域反射法(TDR)测量土体体积含水率的理论基础。通过对重塑的南宁膨胀土进行试验,选择经验公式法、边界法及理论模型法模拟其体积含水率-等效介电常数的变化规律。研究发现,南宁膨胀土的实测值落在Hashin-Shtrikman边界和Wiener边界以内,但Hashin-Shtrikman边界具有更小的范围;由于膨胀土的黏性较大,结合水存在显著的影响,Topp公式计算值偏高,但采用考虑三相组分含量的Looyenga公式可反映结合水的影响,从而得到更好的结果;理论模型法的Maxwell-Garnett模型和差分有效介质模型(DEM)需要考虑三相的构成,单独采用气相连续或水相连续的模拟结果均不理想,但如考虑土中水、气分布形态,采用饱和度作为权重函数对单相计算结果进行加权平均后可取得较好的效果。

关键词: 膨胀土, 等效介电常数, 结合水, 三相构成

Abstract: The relationship between volumetric water content of soils and their effective dielectric permittivity is the theoretical basis of time domain reflectometry (TDR) technique. In this study, effective dielectric permittivity of a reconstituted expansive soil sampled from Nanning is measured by time domain reflectometry at different volumetric water contents, and three approaches including empirical equation method, theoretical bound method and theoretical model, are used to simulate the variation of the effective dielectric permittivity. The measured values of dielectric permittivity are found to be located within bounds of the Hashin-Shtrikman and Wiener, but the range of the solutions from the Hashin-Shtrikman bound is narrower than the Wiener bound’s. The effective dielectric permittivity of Nanning expansive soil is overestimated by Topp’s empirical equation, since the bound water in the expansive soil leads to a lower effective dielectric permittivity. The effect of bound water can be considered in Looyenga empirical equation in which three phases are separated and better agreements between predictions and tested results are obtained. Theoretical models have advantage in conceptualizing the effects of internal structure, but for the Maxwell-Garnett model and differential effective medium model, the predicting results of taking liquid phase or gaseous phase as a continuous phase are not satisfactory, since the three- phase configuration is greatly changed during water content increasing. The performance of these two theoretical models can be improved if the saturation are introduced as dependent weight functions to incorporate the calculated results of liquid phase and gaseous phase.

Key words: expansive soil, effective dielectric permittivity, bound water, three-phase configuration

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+2

[1] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[2] 邹维列, 樊科伟, 张攀, 韩仲, . 土工泡沫减压膨胀土挡墙侧向压力及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2537-2544.
[3] 曾召田, 崔哲旗, 孙德安, 姚志, 潘斌, . 南宁膨胀土持水性能的温度效应及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2177-2185.
[4] 张凌凯, 崔子晏, . 干湿−冻融循环条件下膨胀土的压缩及渗透特性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 728-740.
[5] 高浩东, 安然, 孔令伟, 张先伟, 雷学文, . 干燥失水条件下膨胀土的细观裂隙演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 442-450.
[6] 李丽华, 黄 畅, 李文涛, 李孜健, 叶治, . 稻壳灰−矿渣固化膨胀土力学与微观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2821-2832.
[7] 张艺, 李永强, 章定文, 侯爵, 樊晓军, 唐紫琼. 粉土改良膨胀土的路用性能与现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2942-2952.
[8] 庄心善, 周荣, 周睦凯, 陶高梁, 金合意. 孔隙溶液对循环荷载作用下膨胀土 累积变形及阻尼比影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 1-10.
[9] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 程德虎, 张呈斌, 毛航宇, . 土工袋加固膨胀土边坡降雨−日晒循环试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 35-42.
[10] 喻成成, 卢正, 姚海林, 刘杰, 詹永祥, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀改性膨胀土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 157-163.
[11] 刘观仕, 赵守道, 牟智, 莫燕坤, 赵青松, . 结构性对膨胀土收缩特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1772-1780.
[12] 李新明, 贾亚垒, 王志留, 尹松. 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的应变速率效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3327-3334.
[13] 庄心善, 周睦凯, 陶高梁, 周 荣, 彭承鸿, 林万锋. 循环荷载下发泡聚苯乙烯改良膨胀土动弹性 模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2427-2436.
[14] 商拥辉, 徐林荣, 蔡雨, . 浸水环境下重载铁路改良土路基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2739-2745.
[15] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .