岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 194-204.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2281

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析

于丽1, 2，吕城1, 2，段儒禹1, 2，王明年1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院，四川 成都 610031；2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室，四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-19 修回日期:2019-05-06 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:于丽，女，1978年生，博士，副教授，主要从事隧道与地下工程的设计、研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划课题（No. 2017G007-G-2）

Upper bound limit analysis of three-dimensional collapse mechanism of shallow buried soil tunnel under pore pressure based on nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion

YU Li1, 2, LÜ Cheng1, 2, DUAN Ru-yu1, 2, WANG Ming-nian1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Traffic Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-12-19 Revised:2019-05-06 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by China Railway Corporation Science and Technology Research and Development Program (2017G007-G-2).

PDF (Chinese)

199

摘要： 浅埋土质隧道的稳定性研究一直是隧道工程的关键问题，而孔隙水压力的存在影响着浅埋土质隧道的安全。构建了隧道顶部为圆弧形的浅埋土质隧道的三维塌落机制，基于非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则和极限分析上限法，并考虑孔隙水压力的作用，推导出浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围及支护力的最优上限解计算公式。通过与既有研究进行对比，验证了所提方法的合理性。分析了不同参数对塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力的影响，结果表明：孔隙水压力对浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力有着显著的影响；孔隙水压力对塌落范围、塌落土体重力的影响比较复杂，而支护力都随着孔隙水压力系数的增大而增大；不同参数对浅埋土质隧道的塌落范围、塌落土体的重力及支护力的影响规律不同。新方法可为浅埋土质隧道的设计优化提供理论支撑。

关键词: 浅埋土质隧道, 非线性破坏准则, 孔隙水压力, 三维塌落机制, 上限定理

Abstract: The stability study of shallow-buried soil tunnel has always been a key problem in tunnel engineering. The existence of pore water pressure can contribute to the collapse of shallow-buried soil tunnels that has serious influence over the safety of life and property. In this paper, the three-dimensional collapse mechanism of a shallow-buried earth tunnel with a circular top arc is constructed. Based on the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion and the limit analysis upper bound method, the collapse range of the shallow-buried earth tunnel is derived considering the pore water pressure. The formula for solving the optimal upper limit of support force is established. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with existing research for rationality verification of the method. The effects of different parameters on the collapse range, gravity and support force of the collapsed soil are analyzed. The results show that the pore water pressure has significant impact on the collapse range of the shallow buried soil tunnel as well as the gravity and support force of the collapsed soil. The effects of pore water pressure on the collapse range and weight of the collapsed soil are complex, while the support force increases with the increase of the pore water pressure coefficient. Moreover, the collapse range, gravity and support force of shallow soil tunnel are influenced with varying degrees by different parameters. This method can provide theoretical support for the design optimisation of shallow-buried soil tunnel.

Key words: shallow buried soil tunnel, nonlinear failure criterion, pore pressure, three-dimensional collapse mechanism, upper limit theorem

中图分类号: 

  • U 456.2
[1] 张小玲, 朱冬至, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩−土 相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2252-2260.
[2] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[3] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[4] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[5] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[6] 张治国, 黄茂松, 杨 轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动 诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[7] 贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王 昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[8] 汪华斌, 李建梅, 金怡轩, 周 博, 周 宇, . 降雨诱发边坡破坏数值模拟两个关键问题 的解决方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 777-784.
[9] 黄朝煊. 塑料排水板处理地基非线性固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4819-4827.
[10] 张晓曦, 何思明, 樊晓一, . L型挡土墙滑裂面确定方法与地震稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[11] 尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 刘旭耀, 李兴明, . 土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 156-164.
[12] 赵建军，余建乐，解明礼，柴贺军，李 涛，步 凡，蔺 冰，. 降雨诱发填方路堤边坡变形机制物理模拟研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2933-2940.
[13] 张修照，巫尚蔚，张 超，杨春和，. 不同固结条件下尾矿动孔压演化规律[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 815-822.
[14] 王永洪，张明义，刘俊伟，白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[15] 陈卫忠，马永尚，于洪丹，龚 哲，李香玲，. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发