岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1899-1910.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1558

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究

朱楠1,刘春原1, 2, 3,赵献辉1,王文静1   

  1. 1. 河北工业大学 土木与交通学院,天津 300401;2. 河北工业大学 河北省交通基础设施智能建造与管养重点实验室,天津 300401; 3. 河北工业大学 河北省土木工程技术研究中心,天津 300401
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-09 修回日期:2019-11-12 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:朱楠,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事土的力学特性及地基处理等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技计划项目(No.15273802D);河北省交通运输厅科技计划项目(No.Y-2012004)。

Micro-structure characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths in K0 consolidated drained tests

ZHU Nan1, LIU Chun-yuan1, 2, 3, ZHAO Xian-hui1, WANG Wen-jing1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Maintenance of Transportation Infrastructure of Hebei Province, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 3. Civil Engineering Technology Research Center of Hebei Province, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
  • Received:2019-09-09 Revised:2019-11-12 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 刘春原,男,1957年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: cyliu@hebut.edu.cn E-mail:zhn307@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Plan Project of Hebei Province (15273802D) and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Communications Department of Hebei Province (Y-2012004).

摘要: 研究结构性黏土在不同应力路径下的微观结构变化可深入了解K0固结下结构性黏土结构性特性变化的内在机制。在对衡水地区天然黏土进行不同应力路径条件下三轴剪切试验的基础上,利用微观定量化技术,对比不同应力路径条件下土样的微观结构,从微观角度对结构性黏土的微观结构特征变化机制进行了解释。结果表明:在不同应力路径下土体的孔隙直径、颗粒和孔隙的定向排列变化较大,而颗粒和孔隙的形状特征变化较小。增大球应力使土颗粒变得密实,使孔隙压缩,土体体积减小;减小球应力使土颗粒变得松散,孔隙直径增大,土体体积膨胀。增大或减小偏应力对土体微观结构的影响相似,在土体结构破坏前使土骨架变形产生一定压缩,在土体结构破坏后使颗粒错动、翻滚并相互搭接,扩大了粒间孔隙,使土体出现剪胀。土颗粒形状的不规则性导致球应力和偏应力对体应变和剪应变的交叉影响。研究结果揭示了不同应力路径下结构性黏土应力?应变特性的微观机制。

关键词: 结构性黏土, 应力路径, 应力?应变特性, 微观结构

Abstract: Microstructure change of structured clay under different stress paths is the key in understanding the intrinsic mechanism of structure variation of structured clay in K0 consolidated tests. Based on the triaxial shear tests under different stress paths for the natural clay in Hengshui area, the micro-structure of soil under different stress paths were compared and the mechanism of micro-structure variation of structured clay was studied from the microscopic perspective. The results show that variation of pore size, orientation of particles and pores is large, while the variation of particle and pore shape is small under different stress paths. The increase of spherical stress leads to the consolidation of soil particles, and the soil pores are compressed, resulting in the decrease of soil volume. The soil particles loose, the pore size and soil volume increase when the spherical stress decreases. The increase or decrease in deviatoric stress has similar impact on soil microstructures, which results in the compression of soil skeleton before the failure of soil structure. After the failure of soil structure, the soil particles are misaligned. They rolled and connected to each other, which leading to the expansion of inter-grain pores and dilatancy of soil occurs. The spherical stress and deviated stress caused by irregular shaped soil particle form mutual effects on volumetric strain and shear strain. The results reveal the microscopic mechanism of stress-strain characteristics of structured clay under different stress paths.

Key words: structured clay, stress path, stress-strain characteristics, microstructure

中图分类号: 

  • TU442
[1] 胡利文, 刘志军, . 真空预压加固土体变形机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 790-799.
[2] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[3] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[4] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[5] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, . 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 561-570.
[6] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[7] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[8] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[9] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[10] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[11] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[12] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
[13] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[14] 王东伟, 陆武萍, 唐朝生, 赵红崴, 李胜杰, 林銮, 冷挺, . 砂土微观结构样品制备技术及量化方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4783-4792.
[15] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, 李彪, 周永强, . 卢氏膨胀岩在干湿循环作用下的胀缩特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4279-4288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[3] 胡 伟,黄 义,刘增荣. 循环荷载下饱和黄土不排水强度退化规律试验与理论研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2996 -3000 .
[4] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[5] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[6] 姜领发,陈善雄,于忠久. 饱和土中任意形状衬砌对稳态压缩波的散射[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3063 -3070 .
[7] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[8] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[9] 定培中,周 密,张 伟. 混凝土浇筑施工对穿黄隧洞衬砌垫层渗透性影响试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3159 -3162 .
[10] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .