砂土层中盾构掘进实测数据及数值模拟分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1606

岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 563-574.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1606

砂土层中盾构掘进实测数据及数值模拟分析

骆冠勇^{1, 2}，钟淼^{1, 2}，曹洪^{1, 2}，潘泓^{1, 2}

1. 华南理工大学土木与交通学院，广东广州 510640；2. 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室，广东广州 510640

收稿日期:2021-09-21 修回日期:2022-07-20 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
通讯作者: 潘泓，男，1967年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: hpan@scut.edu.cn E-mail:luogy@scut.edu.cn
作者简介:骆冠勇，男，1979年生，副教授，主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.51978282）；广东省自然科学基金项目（No.2020A1515010583）；华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放研究项目（No.2022ZB21）；广东省现代土木工程技术重点实验室（No.2021B1212040003）。

Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand

LUO Guan-yong^{1, 2}, ZHONG Miao^{1, 2}, CAO Hong^{1, 2}, PAN Hong^{1, 2}

1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China

Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-07-20 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010583), the State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University Of Technology (2022ZB21) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Civil Engineering Technology(2021B1212040003).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 相对于其他土层，盾构在富水砂层中掘进的风险更大，但目前盾构掘进引起砂层变形的机制并不清楚。依托广州某电力隧道项目，选取一典型富水砂性地层断面对盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形进行高频率、近距离的监测，得到以下几点认识可供类似的工程参考：（1）富水环境下，相对于均质砂层，隧道处于粉砂+粗砂地层组合更容易发生渗透破坏。此情况下，粉砂层在承受更大渗透力同时，又受粗砂层强烈补给供水，非常容易被侵蚀甚至掏空。（2）地层均匀损失与局部集中损失引起地层扰动规律有较大的不同。地层均匀损失时由于拱效应没集中局部损失的强，其扰动范围、地表沉降及水平位移均更大。水平位移最大值的位置与地层损失的非均匀化也密切相关。地层均匀损失时，隧道两边最大水平位移发生在隧道高程范围内；但地层非均匀损失（隧道顶部局部塌落）时，发生最大的水平位移的位置会明显上移。（3）渗透力的作用使得地层扰动范围扩大。（4）地层损失率受注浆影响严重，隧道附近大，地表最小，隧道上方土体呈松散化趋势。

关键词: 盾构施工, 地层变形, 砂层, 实测, 数值模拟

Abstract: Compared with other soil layers, the risk of shield tunneling in water-rich sand is greater, but the mechanism of sand deformation caused by shield tunneling is currently unclear. Relying on an electric power tunnel project in Guangzhou, this paper selects a typical water-rich sandy stratum section for high-frequency, close-range monitoring of stratum deformation caused by shield tunnel construction. The following understandings are obtained, which can be used as reference for similar projects. 1) In a water-rich environment, compared to in a homogeneous sand layer, in a combination of fine and coarse sands, the tunnel is more prone to seepage failure. Under this circumstance, the fine sand layer bears greater seepage force while being strongly supplied with water from the coarse sand layer, and the fine sand layer is thus very easy to be eroded or even hollowed out. 2) The ground deformation caused by uniform volume loss and local concentrated loss is quite different. In the case of uniform loss, because the arching effect is not as strong as the local loss, the disturbance range, surface settlement and horizontal displacement are all larger. The location of the maximum horizontal displacement is also closely related to the heterogeneity of the formation loss. When the formation loss is uniform, the maximum horizontal displacement on both sides of the tunnel occurs within the tunnel elevation range; but when the uneven loss (partial collapse of the tunnel top) occurs, the location of the maximum horizontal displacement will move up significantly. 3) The seepage force expands the range of stratum disturbance. 4) The stratum loss rate is severely affected by grouting. The vicinity of the tunnel is large, the ground surface is the smallest, and the soil above the tunnel tends to loosen.

Key words: shield construction, soil deformation, sand stratum, field monitor, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U455.43

骆冠勇, 钟淼, 曹洪, 潘泓, . 砂土层中盾构掘进实测数据及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 563-574.

LUO Guan-yong, ZHONG Miao, CAO Hong, PAN Hong, . Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 563-574.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[2]	蒋凡, 刘华, 岳青, 杨文爽. 超大沉井基础取土下沉刃脚土压力变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 431-442.
[3]	周昊, 陈国良, 何翔, 吴佳明, 张荣堂, 殷大伟, 袁坤彬, 武哲, . 岩土工程建筑信息模型集成与仿真关键技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 443-453.
[4]	邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴, 潘玉丛, 伯音, . 水平层状软弱围岩破裂碎胀大变形机制有限元−离散元耦合数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 508-523.
[5]	袁维, 钟辉亚, 朱屹, 唐佳, 洪建飞, 王亚雄, 林杭, 万宁, 王安礼, . 基于数据融合的边坡临滑状态确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 575-587.
[6]	丁扬, 熊晔, 陈孜孜, 吴晓寒, 王小波, . 灌注桩动力特性试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 640-646.
[7]	阮滨, 吉瀚文, 王苏阳, 贺鸿俊, 苗雨. 基于台阵观测的基岩地震动入射波分离方法及数值验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2615-2623.
[8]	樊浩博, 周定坤, 刘勇, 宋玉香, 朱正国, 朱永全, 高新强, 郭佳奇, . 富水管道型岩溶隧道衬砌结构力学响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1884-1898.
[9]	张革, 曹玲, 王成汤, . 考虑多晶冰软化特性的弹塑性损伤本构模型开发及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1969-1977.
[10]	张婵青, 何凤飞, 姜顺航, 曾子真, 熊峰, 陈江, . 土体含水率监测的移动点热源法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 2025-2034.
[11]	李宁, 潘行, 张茂建, 张慧莉, 李昕珍, 许建聪, . 降雨形式对毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗性能的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1546-1556.
[12]	池小楼, 杨科, 刘文杰, 付强, 魏祯, . 大倾角煤层分层综采再生顶板破断规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1391-1400.
[13]	贺勇, 胡广, 张召, 娄伟, 邹艳红, 李星, 张可能, . 污染场地六价铬迁移转化机制与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 528-538.
[14]	魏天宇, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 胡大伟, 周辉, 洪雯. 湿化膨胀与掺砂率对混合型缓冲材料 THM耦合过程的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 549-562.
[15]	侯晓萍, 樊恒辉. 基于COMSOL Multiphysics的非饱和裂隙土降雨入渗特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 563-572.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

砂土层中盾构掘进实测数据及数值模拟分析

Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10