岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3192-3200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2180

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载下弱膨胀土累积变形与动强度 特性试验研究

庄心善,赵汉文,陶高梁,王俊翔,黄勇杰   

  1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 修回日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:庄心善,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土工程与边坡工程方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51708190)

Accumulated deformation and dynamic strength properties of weak expansive soil under cyclic loading

ZHUANG Xin-shan, ZHAO Han-wen, TAO Gao-liang, WANG Jun-xiang, HUANG Yong-jie   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Revised:2020-05-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708190).

摘要: 弱膨胀土经防水保湿处理后可作为路基填土,而目前对其动力响应特性研究较少。为深入分析合肥地区弱膨胀土动力特性,利用GDS动静态真三轴仪对土体进行循环动荷载试验,研究了不同围压、固结应力比及动应力幅值对土体累积变形及强度特性的影响规律。依据试样在不同围压、固结应力比、动应力幅值下的累积变形,建立了弱膨胀土累积变形预测模型。根据应变速率将弱膨胀土累积应变曲线划分为稳定型、破坏型和临界型,并给出判别标准。分析了不同围压、固结应力比下弱膨胀土动强度变化规律,在固结应力比超过1.5时土体强度明显下降,动黏聚力cd随循环破坏振次lgNf增大呈线性减小,动内摩擦角?d 随循环破坏振次增大略微减小。该试验结果可为相关工程提供基础数据与参考。

关键词: 膨胀土, 循环荷载, 固结应力比, 累积变形, 动强度

Abstract: Weak expansive soil after treatment with waterproof and moisturizing can be used as the highway subgrade filling, and studies on its dynamic response characteristics are few. For a thorough analysis of the dynamic properties of weak expansive soil in Hefei, a series of cyclic load triaxial tests was conducted. Considering the influence of confining pressure, consolidation ratio and dynamic stress amplitude on the weak expansive soil dynamic property, the tests obtained the development curves of the accumulated deformation and dynamic strength under different test conditions. Based on the accumulated deformation of samples under different confining pressures, consolidation ratios and dynamic stress amplitudes, a prediction model for accumulated deformation of weak expansive soils was established. The accumulated strain curves of expansive soils can be divided into plastically stable, critical and destructive types according to the strain rate, and the criteria for judging the cumulative strain of weak expansive soil was given. The dynamic strength of weak expansive soil under different confining pressures and consolidation ratios was analyzed. It was found that the dynamic strength of the soil decreased a lot when the consolidation ratio was over than 1.5; the dynamic cohesion cd decreased with the increase of failure vibration, and the dynamic internal friction angle ?d decreased slightly with the increase of failure vibration. Results obtained can provide basic data and reference for relevant projects.

Key words: expansive soil, cyclic loading, consolidation stress ratio, accumulated deformation, dynamic strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 李大勇, 张景睿, 张雨坤, 高玉峰, 刘俊伟, . 饱和砂土中裙式吸力基础水平循环特性和 累积转角变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 611-619.
[2] 任三绍, 张永双, 徐能雄, 吴瑞安, 刘筱怡. 含砾滑带土复活启动强度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 863-873.
[3] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[4] 商拥辉, 徐林荣, 蔡雨, . 浸水环境下重载铁路改良土路基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2739-2745.
[5] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[6] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[7] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[8] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[9] 李宗泽, 姜德义, 范金洋, 陈 结, 刘 伟, 吴 斐, 杜 超, 康燕飞. 盐岩三轴间隔疲劳特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1305-1312.
[10] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[11] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[12] 陈佳莹, 滕竞成, 尹振宇, . 黏土中桶式基础的宏单元模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3823-3830.
[13] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[14] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[15] 唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[3] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[4] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[5] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[6] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[7] 刘 晓,唐辉明,罗红明,陈守义. 对滑坡防治工程相关规范中渗流问题的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .
[8] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[9] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[10] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .