岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 698-710.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1469

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

一种模拟原状泥岩动力打桩与静载试验 装置的研制及应用

银吉超1, 2,白晓宇1, 2,张亚妹1, 2,闫楠1, 2,王永洪1, 2,张明义1, 2   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学 土木工程学院,山东 青岛 266520; 2. 青岛理工大学 山东省高等学校蓝色经济区工程建设与安全协同创新中心,山东 青岛 266520
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-21 接受日期:2022-11-04 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 白晓宇,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基基础及城市地下工程领域的教学与科研工作。E-mail:baixiaoyu538@163.com E-mail:yinjichao970904@163.com
  • 作者简介:银吉超,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地基基础方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51778312);山东省自然科学基金重点项目(No. ZR2020KE009);山东省博士后创新项目(No. 201903043)。

Development and application of a test device for simulating pile driving and static load in undisturbed mudstone

YIN Ji-chao1, 2, BAI Xiao-yu1, 2, ZHANG Ya-mei1, 2, YAN Nan1, 2, WANG Yong-hong1, 2, ZHANG Ming-yi1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266520, China; 2. Engineering Construction and Safety Collaborative Innovation Center of Shandong Provincial Colleges and Universities Blue Economic Zone, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266520, China
  • Received:2022-09-21 Accepted:2022-11-04 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778312), the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020KE009) and Shandong Provincial Post-doctoral Innovation Project (201903043).

摘要:

针对泥岩地基打入桩贯入困难、承载力不足现象及软岩易扰动难以制备模型地基的特点,通过原状软岩约束单元、锤击贯入单元、导轨支架单元、静载单元4部分的设计与联系,初步研制了基于原状软岩的模拟打桩与静载试验装置,进行标定及验证性试验、应用试验,验证装置的可行性、稳定性,分析打入桩的沉贯与承载特性,明确桩周泥岩力学特征,提出进一步研究展望与工程应用建议。研究表明:(1)验证性试验、应用试验结果与现场试验结果一致,沉贯特性、承载特性与现场试验相同,验证了试验装置的可行性;(2)荷载传递相关因子稳定性好,进一步证实了试验装置的荷载传递稳定可靠;(3)泥岩软硬互层严重,每10 mm贯入度通过锤击数表征的贯入阻力差异性大,低强度软夹层发生的静载破坏呈现出沉降急剧增大的陡降特征;(4)打桩对桩周2dd为桩径)范围内的泥岩造成不同梯度的损伤,每间隔0.5d,强度损失66.0%、40.5%、17.0%、7.0%,弹性模量损失80.5%、54.5%、26.5%、11.0%;(5)完善取样技术,加强泥岩软硬互层的勘察判定,增强控制贯入度的施工措施,泥岩地基打入桩承载力的理论分析、数值计算及设计施工,应按损伤梯度合理选取原状力学参数折减后的数值。试验装置具有稳定、可靠、可控等优点,可为泥岩地基动力打入桩的相关研究提供支撑。

关键词: 原状软岩, 试验装置, 动力打桩, 静载试验, 桩周泥岩强度, 模型试验

Abstract:

 In response to the difficulties in driving piles into mudstone foundation, insufficient bearing capacity, and the difficulty in preparing a model foundation due to the disturbance of soft rock, a simulation pile driving and static load test device based on undisturbed soft rock was preliminarily developed. The device mainly includes undisturbed soft rock constraint model box unit, hammer-driven unit, guide rail support unit and static load unit. Calibration tests and application tests were carried out to verify the feasibility and stability of the device. The penetration and bearing characteristics of driven pile were analyzed, the mechanical characteristics of mudstone around pile caused by pile driving damage were defined, and further research prospect and engineering application suggestions were put forward. The study shows that: 1) The results of tests are consistent with that of field test, and the penetration characteristics and bearing characteristics are both the same as those of field test, which verifies the feasibility of the test device. 2) The stability of the load transfer factor α further proves that the load transfer of the test device is stable and reliable. 3) As mudstone has intensive soft and hard interbedding, as a result, there is a significant difference in penetration resistance represented by the number of blows per 10 mm of penetration, and the static load failure of low strength soft interlayers presents a precipitously increasing settlement. 4) The mudstone within 2d (d is the pile diameter) around the pile is damaged by pile driving; for every 0.5d interval, the strength loss is 66.0%, 40.5%, 17.0%, 7.0% and the elastic modulus loss is 80.5%, 54.5%, 26.5%, 11.0%, respectively.  5) The reduced values of the undisturbed mechanical parameters should be selected according to the damage characteristics induced by pile driving in the design and bearing capacity evaluation of mudstone. The test device has the advantages of stability, reliability and controllability, which can provide support for related research on pile driving in mudstone.

Key words: undisturbed soft rock, test device, pile driving, static load test, mudstone strength around pile, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 凌造, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 李波, 苏定立, . 非挤土嵌岩预应力高强度混凝土管桩的桩端承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 97-107.
[2] 朱姝, 阙相成, 朱珍德, 朱其志, . 考虑截面规则性的柱状节理岩体变形及强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 213-225.
[3] 王斌, 李洁涛, 王佳俊, 陈鹏林, . 强降雨诱发堆积体滑坡模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 234-248.
[4] 杨凯丞, 吴曙光, 廖海成, 张辉, . 双锚杆受力机制分析及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 495-503.
[5] 邹维列, 樊科伟, 张攀, 韩仲, . 土工泡沫减压膨胀土挡墙侧向压力及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2537-2544.
[6] 刘欣, 沈宇鹏, 刘志坚, 王炳禄, 刘越, 韩昀希. 地下水流速对地铁联络通道冻结壁形成过程影响的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2667-2678.
[7] 谢康, 苏谦, 陈晓斌, 刘宝, 王武斌, 王迅, 邓志兴, . 无砟轨道聚氨酯碎石防水联结层单元模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2308-2317.
[8] 卢钦武, 关振长, 林林, 吴淑婧, 宋德杰. 基于静力推覆试验的山岭隧道衬砌-地层相互作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2318-2326.
[9] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[10] 季雨坤, 王钦科, 赵国良, 张健, 马建林, . 斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1604-1614.
[11] 马鹏杰, 芮瑞, 曹先振, 夏荣基, 王曦, 丁锐恒, 孙天健, . 微型桩加固长大缓倾裂隙土边坡模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1695-1707.
[12] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[13] 冷先伦, 王川, 盛谦, 宋文军, 陈健, 张占荣, 陈菲, . 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1283-1294.
[14] 宋洋, 王宏帅, 李昂, 王鑫, 肖作明, 苑强, . 富水粉细砂层盾尾同步注浆浆液渗透-压密扩散机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1319-1329.
[15] 王力, 南芳芸, 王世梅, 陈勇, 李小伟, 范志宏, 陈玙珊, . 三峡库区降雨型滑坡入渗特征及变形机制——基于一维和二维模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1363-1374.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王明年,陈炜韬,刘大刚,童建军. 公路隧道岩质和土质围岩统一亚级分级标准研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 547 -552 .
[2] 李云鹏,王芝银. LNG储罐高低承台桩基础抗震性能对比分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 265 -269 .
[3] 杨雪强,凌平平,向胜华. 基于系列Drucker-Prager破坏准则评述土坡的稳定性[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 865 -870 .
[4] 孙长帅,杨海巍,徐光黎. 岩石锚杆基础抗拔承载力计算方法探究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 75 -78 .
[5] 陈 菲 ,邓建辉 ,高明忠 ,王俤剀 ,蒙玉林 ,黄润太 . 丹巴县莫洛村滑坡的地质成因与稳定评价[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1781 -1786 .
[6] 武文华,李锡夔. 多孔介质中含均相/非均相反应传质过程数值模拟[J]. , 2008, 29(5): 1152 -1158 .
[7] 江 权 ,冯夏庭 ,陈建林 ,张春生 ,黄书岭 . 锦屏二级水电站厂址区域三维地应力场非线性反演[J]. , 2008, 29(11): 3003 -3010 .
[8] 陈晓平,曾玲玲,吕 晶,钱 鹤,邝立文. 结构性软土力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(12): 3223 -3228 .
[9] 刘志春,李文江,朱永全. 淤泥质地层地铁隧道施工地表沉降预测及分析[J]. , 2005, 26(10): 1681 -1684 .
[10] 扈胜霞 ,陈育民 ,闫竹玲,. 弹黏塑性模型及其在预压处理软基沉降计算中的应用[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1173 -1180 .