岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 396-406.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0237

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究

张宪尚1,文光才1,朱哲明2,隆清明1,刘杰3   

  1. 1. 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司 瓦斯灾害监控与应急技术国家重点实验室,重庆 400037; 2. 四川大学 建筑与环境学院,四川 成都 610065;3. 绍兴文理学院 土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴 312000
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-27 接受日期:2023-05-22 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘杰,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事裂隙岩体结构表征及流-固耦合效应等方面的研究。E-mail:liujie518620@163.com
  • 作者简介:张宪尚,男,1987年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩石动力学方面的研究。zxshang_cumt@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52204261,No. 52274246);重庆市自然科学基金(No. CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0577);重庆市杰出青年科学基金(No. CSTB2022NSCQ-JQX0014);四川省自然科学基金(No. 2022NSFSC1915)

Dynamic propagation characteristics of mode I crack in infilled jointed rock masses under impact load

ZHANG Xian-shang1, WEN Guang-cai1, ZHU Zhe-ming2, LONG Qing-ming1, LIU jie3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Gas Disaster Detecting, Preventing, and Emergency Controlling, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400037, China; 2. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
  • Received:2023-02-27 Accepted:2023-05-22 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52204261, 52274246), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0577), the Chongqing Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (CSTB2022NSCQ-JQX0014) and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province(2022NSFSC1915).

摘要: 为研究冲击荷载作用下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性,利用分离式霍普金森杆(split Hopkinson pressure bar,简称SHPB)试验系统及裂纹扩展测试系统,对石膏、水泥及云石胶3种充填节理的侧开三角形单边裂纹(single cleavage triangle,简称SCT)岩体试件进行动态冲击压缩试验,对比分析裂纹动态扩展过程及冲击破坏模式,并通过试验-数值法研究了I型裂纹动态扩展过程中的应力强度因子及能量释放率的变化规律。研究表明:充填节理岩体主要有3种破坏模式,分别为预制裂纹扩展贯穿整个试件、裂纹贯穿后发生充填节理破坏、充填节理先破坏并阻滞裂纹贯穿;节理充填体的破坏与充填体强度、胶结力及应变率等相关;裂纹扩展速度自起裂处振荡增长,并在贯穿充填节理前某个位置达到最大,而应力强度因子及能量释放率在节理附近达到最大;充填节理刚度退化会抑制裂纹的扩展,并造成能量释放率的急剧增大;岩性组合差异加剧岩体试件材料属性的失配,导致应力强度因子及能量释放率随裂纹穿过节理后出现不同程度降低。

关键词: 冲击荷载, 充填节理, I型裂纹, 应力强度因子, 裂纹扩展速度

Abstract: To study the dynamic propagation characteristics of mode I crack in infilled jointed rock masses under impact load, dynamic impact compression tests were implemented by a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system and a crack propagation measurement device. The single cleavage triangle (SCT) specimens with the joints filled by gypsum, cement, and marble glue were adopted. The dynamic propagation processes and impact failure modes of the crack were analyzed, and the evolution laws of stress intensity factor and energy release rate during the dynamic propagation of mode I crack were studied by the experimental-numerical method. The results show that there are three main failure modes of the infilled jointed rock masses: the prefabricated crack extends and penetrates the whole specimen, the infilled joint fails after the crack penetration, and the infilled joint fails first and then blocks the crack penetration. The failure of the filling body in the joint is related to the strength and cementation force of the filling body, as well as the strain rate of the dynamic load. The crack propagation speed has an oscillatory growth from the crack initiation point and reaches the maximum at a certain position before the crack penetrates the infilled joint, while the stress intensity factor and energy release rate reach the maximum near the joint. The stiffness degradation of the infilled joint inhibits the crack propagation and causes a sharp increase in the energy release rate. The difference in lithological combinations aggravates the material property mismatch of the rock mass specimens, resulting in different decreases of stress intensity factor and energy release rate as the crack passes through the joint.

Key words: impact load, infilled joint, mode I crack, stress intensity factor, crack propagation speed

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[2] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[3] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[4] 王雪松, 郭连军, 刘鑫, 邓丁, 张久洋, 徐振洋, . 冲击作用下花岗岩的I型裂纹形态及断面粗糙度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1925-1936.
[5] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 王峥峥, 张生, . 明棚洞落石冲击荷载计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1748-1760.
[6] 岳豪, 杨胜利, 翟瑞昊, 张燊, 崔轩. 含砂岩石力学特性及其致灾机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1230-1244.
[7] 张东晓, 郭伟耀, 赵同彬, 谷雪斌, 陈玏昕, . 岩石I型裂纹定向扩展规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 231-244.
[8] 柴少波, 宋浪, 刘欢, 阿比尔的, 柴连增, . 酸性干湿循环下充填节理岩石劣化性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 2993-3002.
[9] 王本鑫, 金爱兵, 孙浩, 王树亮, . 基于DIC的含不同角度3D打印 粗糙交叉节理试样破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 439-450.
[10] 刘建, 乔兰, 李庆文, 李远, 赵国彦, . 分布载荷加载下中心直裂纹巴西圆盘的 断裂参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2987-2996.
[11] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[12] 徐东升, 黄明, 黄佛光, 陈成. 不同级配珊瑚砂水泥胶结体的破坏行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[13] 杨石扣, 张继勋, 任旭华, . 基于改进数值流形法的接触裂纹问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2016-2021.
[14] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
[15] 杨石扣,任旭华,张继勋,. 基于数值流形法的重力坝水力劈裂研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3055-3060.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .