循环荷载下双曲线模型修正土体一维固结解

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 455-460.

循环荷载下双曲线模型修正土体一维固结解

张磊¹, ²，孙树林²，龚晓南¹，张杰¹

1.浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，杭州 310058；2.河海大学土木工程学院，南京 210098

收稿日期:2008-09-17 出版日期:2010-02-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
作者简介:张磊，男，1981年生，博士研究生，主要从事岩土工程研究方面的工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 50578143）。

Solution for one-dimensional consolidation based on hyperbola model under cyclic loading

ZHANG Lei¹, ², SUN Shu-lin², GONG Xiao-nan¹, ZHANG Jie¹

1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received:2008-09-17 Online:2010-02-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

假定土体的应力-应变关系满足双曲线模型、渗透系数的降低与压缩系数的减小成正比以及初始有效应力沿深度均匀分布，推导出任意荷载下单层地基的非线性一维固结方程。结合具体的定解条件采用分离变量法求出土体有效应力的通解，并进一步求出超静孔隙水压力、按沉降定义的平均固结度Us以及按孔隙水压力定义的平均固结度Up的通解。根据通解求出梯形低频循环荷载作用下的解，并找出循环荷载作用下土体固结性状的影响因素。基于循环荷载作用下的解，采用FORTRAN语言编制了计算程序，计算并分析考虑土体本构关系非线性时的固结性状，以及反映土体本构特征的参数E和n对固结性状的影响。计算结果表明：①Us稍大于Up；②距排水平面越近，附加有效应力受加载方式的影响越明显，距排水平面越远则相反；③E和n对Us的影响很小，可以忽略不计；④E和n对Up和附加有效应力的影响较大且不容忽略。

关键词: 循环荷载, 一维固结, 双曲线模型, 沉降

Abstract:

Suppose the constitutive relation of soil to satisfy the hyperbola model. By assuming that the decrease of the hydraulic conductivity is proportional to the decrease of the compression conductivity and the distribution of initial effective pressure doesn’t vary with depth, the one-dimensional nonlinear partial differential consolidation equation which is under random time-depending loading is deduced. According to the idiographic initial conditions and the boundary conditions, the equation is solved using the variable separation method. The general solution of the effective stress is achieved; and then the general solution of the excess pore pressure, the general solution of the average consolidation degree defined according to the settlement and the general solution of the average consolidation degree defined according to the excess pore pressure are achieved. Finally, the solutions under trapezium low-frequency cyclic loading are achieved using the general solutions; and the factors which influence the consolidation characters are found. Based on the solutions under low-frequency cyclic loading, the relevant computer program is developed using FORTRAN language. Using this program, the consolidation characters and the influences of the parameters E and n which reflect the constitutive relation on the consolidation characters are analyzed. The computing results show that the average consolidation degree defined according to the settlement is a little bigger than the average consolidation degree defined according to the excess pore pressure; the closer to the drainage plane, the more obviously the mode of the loading influence the additional effective stress; the influences of E and n on the average consolidation degree defined according to the settlement are so small that can be ignored; however, the influences of E and n on the average consolidation degree defined according to the excess pore pressure and the additional effective stress are bigger, so that they can not be ignored.

Key words: cyclic loading, one-dimensional consolidation, hyperbola model, settlement

中图分类号:

TU 43

张磊，孙树林，龚晓南，张杰. 循环荷载下双曲线模型修正土体一维固结解[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 455-460.

ZHANG Lei, SUN Shu-lin, GONG Xiao-nan, ZHANG Jie. Solution for one-dimensional consolidation based on hyperbola model under cyclic loading[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 455-460.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[2]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[3]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[4]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[5]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[6]	唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[7]	卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[8]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[9]	杜文, 王永红, 李利, 朱连臣, 朱浩天, 王有旗, . 双层车站密贴下穿既有隧道案例分析及隧道沉降变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2765-2773.
[10]	黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[11]	张治国, 张瑞, 黄茂松, 宫剑飞, . 基于差异沉降和轴向刚度控制的竖向荷载作用下群桩基础优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2354-2368.
[12]	童立红, 王珏, 郭生根, 朱怀龙, 徐长节, . 变荷载下连续排水边界黏弹性地基一维固结性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1862-1868.
[13]	王胤, 周令新, 杨庆. 基于不规则钙质砂颗粒发展的拖曳力系数模型及其在细观流固耦合数值模拟中应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2009-2015.
[14]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[15]	刘成禹, 张翔, 程凯, 陈博文, . 地下工程涌水涌砂诱发的沉降试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 843-851.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed