岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3343-3354.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2195

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锚索抗滑桩加固堆积型滑坡的受力特性 模型试验与数值模拟研究

王成汤1, 2,王浩1,张玉丰3,覃卫民1,闵弘1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-02 修回日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 王浩,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土工程监测、数据建模、风险分析和相关软件开发。E-mail: hwang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:1004808156@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王成汤,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 41672314,No. 41472288);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1501304)。

Model test and numerical simulation study on the mechanical characteristics of the anchored slide-resistant pile for stabilizing the colluvial landslide

WANG Cheng-tang1, 2, WANG Hao1, ZHANG Yu-feng3, QIN Wei-min1, MIN Hong1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Revised:2020-05-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672314, 41472288) and the Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1501304).

摘要: 为研究锚索抗滑桩加固堆积型滑坡的受力特性及其联合抗滑机制,开展了分级推力荷载作用下锚索抗滑桩加固滑坡的室内物理模型试验,分析了模型滑坡从加载到破坏过程中桩顶位移、桩身前后土压力、桩身弯矩、锚索轴力和滑体深部水平位移的变化规律。并采用数值模拟进行对比分析,两者所得结果吻合较好。结果表明:(1)桩顶位移、桩身弯矩及锚索轴力随推力荷载的变化曲线均呈现明显的三阶段特征,对应的桩?锚荷载分担比呈先增大、后减小和最后趋于稳定的规律。(2)桩前滑体抗力呈抛物线型分布,且抗力值较小;桩后滑体推力呈上大下小的抛物线型分布,合力作用点约位于滑面以上0.5h1处(h1为受荷段长度)。(3)桩身最大弯矩点始终位于滑面以下2 cm处,表明桩前滑床并未发生破坏。(4)由桩身实测弯矩计算得到的桩身荷载分布表明,桩体抗力主要由桩前滑面以下滑床提供,且呈倒三角形分布。(5)锚索的设置能够有效限制桩身变形,同时在工程中更应该注意锚索失效问题。该研究成果可为堆积型滑坡治理中锚索抗滑桩的合理设计提供试验基础。

关键词: 边坡工程, 锚索抗滑桩, 堆积型滑坡, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the mechanical characteristics and the combined anti-slide mechanism of anchored slide-resistant pile for stabilizing the colluvial landslide, an indoor physical model test of a landslide reinforced by anchored slide-resistant pile under multi-stage loading was carried out. The variation curves of displacement of the pile top, soil pressure at the fore and rear of the pile, bending moment of the pile, axial force of anchor cable, deep horizontal displacement of sliding mass, and the characteristics of deformation and failure of the landslide are analyzed. Moreover, numerical simulation is adopted to compare with the model test and the results conform to each other. The results show that: 1) The horizontal displacement of the pile top, the bending moment of the pile and the axial force of anchor cable all show obvious three-stage characteristics under the variation of thrust load, and the load sharing ratio of the pile over the cable increases at first, then decreases, and finally tends to be stable. 2) The sliding mass resistance force at the fore of the pile is parabolic, and the value of the resistance force is small. The sliding mass thrust load at the rear of the pile is parabolic, and the resultant force point is 0.5h1 above the sliding surface (h1 is the length of the loaded segment). 3) The maximum bending moment point of the piles is always 2 cm below the sliding surface, indicating that the sliding bed at the fore of the pile has not been damaged. 4) The load distribution of the piles calculated through the measured bending moment of the piles indicates that the resistance force of the piles is mainly provided by the sliding bed below the sliding surface at the fore of the pile, and the resistance force is triangular. 5) The setting of the anchor cable can effectively limit the pile deformation. Meanwhile, the anchor cable failure problem should be paid more attention to in engineering practice. The research results can provide experimental basis for the rational design of anchored slide-resistant pile in the treatment of colluvial landslide.

Key words: slope engineering, anchored slide-resistant pile, colluvial landslide, model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • P642.22
[1] 陈猛, 崔秀文, 颜鑫, 王浩, 王二磊. 岩石−钢纤维混凝土复合层抗压强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.
[2] 石峰, 卢坤林, 尹志凯. 平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 735-745.
[3] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[4] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[5] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[6] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[7] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[8] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[9] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[10] 金爱兵, 陈帅军, 赵安宇, 孙浩, 张玉帅, . 基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 255-264.
[11] 李军, 翟文宝, 陈朝伟, 柳贡慧, 周英操, . 基于零厚度内聚力单元的水力裂缝 随机扩展方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 265-279.
[12] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[13] 刘润, 曹添铭, 陈广思, 张海洋, 李成凤. 插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2943-2952.
[14] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[15] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[6] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[7] 黄润秋,徐德敏. 岩石(体)渗透性测试的体变量法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2961 -2964 .
[8] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[9] 康厚荣, ,雷明堂,张谢东,赵杰华. 贵州省公路工程岩溶环境区划[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3032 -3036 .
[10] 陈 松,徐光黎,陈国金,吴雪婷. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡滑带工程地质特征研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3048 -3052 .