岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1056-1064.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1050

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锁定方式对锚固节理剪切特性影响的试验研究

郑罗斌1,王亮清1,朱林锋1,姜耀飞1,王斌2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中南勘察基础工程有限公司,湖北 武汉 430081
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-22 修回日期:2020-11-10 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 王亮清,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性与地质灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail: wlq027@126.com E-mail: 2201710072@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郑罗斌,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事高边坡锚固体系长期安全性方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41931295,No. 41877258);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2017YFC1501305)。

Experimental study on the effect of locking mode on shear characteristics of bolted rock joint

ZHENG Luo-bin1, WANG Liang-qing1, ZHU Lin-feng1, JIANG Yao-fei1, WANG Bin2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Central South Exploration & Foundation Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China
  • Received:2020-07-22 Revised:2020-11-10 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41931295, 41877258) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC1501305).

摘要: 锚杆广泛运用于节理岩体的加固,为了探究锚固节理的剪切力学行为,在开展室内直剪试验的基础上研究了两端锁定和无锁定两种锁定方式对锚固节理剪切特性的影响,分析了法向应力、预应力对锚固节理抗剪强度的增强作用。试验过程中通过应变片记录了锚杆各个监测点轴力的变化规律,研究了不同锁定方式下锚杆轴向受力机制。观测剪切试验完成后锚杆的变形特征,分析了法向应力对锚杆弯曲变形的影响。试验结果表明,两端锁定方式的应力?位移曲线呈现弹性阶段、弹塑性阶段、塑性硬化阶段3个阶段,无锁定方式的应力?位移曲线呈现弹性阶段、弹塑性阶段、塑性软化阶段3个阶段;锁定方式对锚固节理的抗剪强度及锚杆轴向变形有重大影响,两端锁定相较于无锁定更有利于发挥锚杆的抗剪作用。分析锚杆剪切试验后塑性铰位置可知,法向应力对锚杆塑性铰位置有重要影响,塑性铰点间的距离随法向应力的增加而减小。根据试验结果,提出了一种预测锚杆塑性铰位置的分析模型,新模型考虑了法向应力的影响,与试验结果吻合较好。

关键词: 锚杆, 锚固节理, 剪切特性, 锁定方式, 塑性铰, 剪切试验

Abstract: Rock bolts have been widely used as the reinforcement of jointed rock mass. To explore the shear behaviors of bolted rock joints, the influences of two locking modes, i.e., two-end locking and no-locking, on the shear characteristics of bolted rock joints were studied based on the indoor direct shear tests. The enhancement of the shear strength of the bolted rock joints influenced by normal stress and prestress was analyzed. During the test, the variation laws of the axial forces at varying monitoring points of the bolt were recorded by strain gauges, and the axial force mechanism of the bolt under different locking modes was studied. The deformation characteristics of the bolt after shear test were carefully examined and the influence of normal stress on the bending deformation of the bolt was analyzed. The results show that the shear stress-displacement curves of the locking bolted joints at both ends can be divided into three stages, i.e., the initial elastic stage, elastoplastic stage and plastic hardening stage. The shear stress-displacement curves of the unlocked bolted joints can be divided into three stages, i.e., the initial elastic stage, elastoplastic stage and plastic softening stage. The locking mode has a significant impact on the shear strength and the axial deformation of bolt. Compared with the no-locking mode, the lock at both ends is more conducive to the shear resistance. Based on the analysis of the plastic hinge position of bolt after shear test, it shows that the normal stress has an important influence on the plastic hinge position, and the distance between the plastic hinge points decreases with the increase in the normal stress. Finally, an analytical model was proposed to predict the position of the plastic hinge. The new model takes into account the influence of the normal stress, which agrees well with the experimental results.

Key words: bolt, bolted joint, shear properties, locking mode, plastic hinge, shear test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458
[1] 冷先伦, 王川, 庞荣, 盛谦, . 透明胶结土材料强度特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2059-2068.
[2] 朱淳, 何满潮, 张晓虎, 陶志刚, 尹乾, 李利峰, . 恒阻大变形锚杆非线性力学模型 及恒阻行为影响参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
[3] 王柳江, 刘斯宏, 赵志杰, 沈超敏, 鲁洋. 土工袋界面动力特性的循环直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1625-1634.
[4] 陈昌富, 杜成, 朱世民, 何仕林, 张根宝, . 红黏土土层锚杆界面剪切应力松弛试验及其模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1201-1209.
[5] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[6] 姚精明, 许自文, 王建, 王路. 锚杆−泡沫铝联合支护防治冲击地压试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 620-626.
[7] 江权, 李力夫, 冯夏庭, 李邵军, 覃卫民, 陈腊春, . 大型多功能高压岩石结构面剪切伺服试验 系统及功能测试分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3159-3169.
[8] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[9] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[10] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[11] 闫超萍, 龙志林, 周益春, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, . 钙质砂剪切特性的围压效应和粒径效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[12] 陈士海, 宫嘉辰, 胡帅伟, . 爆破荷载下围岩及支护锚杆动力响应特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3910-3918.
[13] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[14] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[15] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[7] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[8] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[9] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[10] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,彭建兵,李 红. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 196 -199 .