基于模型试验的古建筑夯土基座抗渗措施研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0344

岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3281-3290.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0344

基于模型试验的古建筑夯土基座抗渗措施研究

朱才辉^{1, 2}，李宁^{1, 2}，马帅²，崔晨²，董学勤²

1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室，陕西西安 710048；2. 西安理工大学岩土工程研究所，陕西西安 710048

收稿日期:2021-03-10 修回日期:2021-07-07 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
作者简介:朱才辉，男，1983年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土工程古建筑保护、岩土数值模拟等方面的研究。
基金资助:
西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室（No.2019KJCXTD-12）；国家自然科学基金（No.51678484）。

Study on anti-seepage measures of rammed earth foundation of ancient buildings based on model test

ZHU Cai-hui^{1, 2}, LI Ning^{1, 2}, MA Shuai^{1, 2}, CUI Chen², DONG Xue-qin²

1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China

Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-07-07 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology(2019KJCXTD-12) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51678484).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 古建筑夯土基座的长期渗漏对其上部结构安全性态和基座外观影响较大，探索基座顶部抗渗措施意义重大。为此，建立了与基座原型尺寸相比为1:18的缩尺模型，开展降雨入渗试验，研究基座顶部素土压实法和不同改性土换填法对基座的抗渗效果。结果表明：（1）当采用素土压实法时，适当增加基座夯土的干密度可降低降雨入渗影响，夯土整体干密度提高10%，降雨入渗影响深度可降低40%以上，增湿程度可降低50%左右，但整体挤密施工会对上部结构及基座外侧砌体结构产生过量侧向变形甚至开裂；（2）当采用5种改性土对局部进行换填时，三合土抗渗效果较好，糯米粉+稻草改性土次之，最终建议采取局部换填改性土和其他构造措施来改善古建筑夯土基座的抗渗性。

关键词: 古建筑, 夯土基座, 抗渗措施, 模型试验

Abstract: The long-term seepage of the rammed earth foundation (REF) has a great influence on the safety of the superstructure and the appearance of the ancient building. It is vital to explore the anti-seepage measures for the top of the REF. In this study, a scale model with a size of 1:18 compared with the real size of the REF was established. The rainfall infiltration tests were carried out to study the anti-seepage effect of the plain soil with compaction method and different modified soils with replacement method on the top of the REF. The results showed that: 1) The rainfall infiltration was reduced by increasing the dry density of rammed earth by using compaction method. When the dry density of REF was increased by 10%, the depth of rainfall infiltration was reduced by more than 40%, and the wetting degree was reduced by about 50%. However, using compaction method could induce damage to the superstructure and the external masonry structure of foundation. 2) When the five kinds of modified soil were used for local replacement, the anti-permeability effect of tabia was better, followed by the modified soil of sticky rice flour and straw. Finally, it is suggested to adopt local replacement of modified soil and other structural measures to improve the anti-seepage effect of REF of ancient buildings.

Key words: ancient building, rammed earth foundation (REF), anti-seepage measures, model test

中图分类号:

TU443

朱才辉, 李宁, 马帅, 崔晨, 董学勤, . 基于模型试验的古建筑夯土基座抗渗措施研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3281-3290.

ZHU Cai-hui, LI Ning, MA Shuai, CUI Chen, DONG Xue-qin, . Study on anti-seepage measures of rammed earth foundation of ancient buildings based on model test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3281-3290.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	林丹彤, 胡黎明. 多孔介质中磷负载纳米铁运动特性的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 337-344.
[2]	周光新, 盛谦, 崔臻, 王天强, 马亚丽娜, 付兴伟, . 走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞破坏机制模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 37-50.
[3]	肖飞, 孔令伟, 刘观仕, 冯衡, 董义义, 曾二贤, . 中密风积沙地层金属装配式基础抗拔模型试验与承载力改进计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 65-75.
[4]	吴慧明, 赵子荣, 林小飞, 史建乾, 龚晓南, . 主动排水固结法气举降水效应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2151-2159.
[5]	李元海, 刘德柱, 杨硕, 孔骏, . 深部复合地层TBM隧道围岩应力与变形规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1783-1793.
[6]	王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 曹周红, . 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.
[7]	刘志鹏, 孔纲强, 文磊, 王志华, 秦红玉, . 砂土地基中倾斜螺旋桩群桩上拔与水平承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1944-1950.
[8]	饶佩森, 李丹, 孟庆山, 王新志, 付金鑫, 雷学文, . 循环荷载作用下钙质砂地基土压力分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1579-1586.
[9]	郭明伟, 马欢, 杨忠明, 王斌, 董学超, 王水林, . 常泰长江大桥施工阶段大型沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1705-1712.
[10]	沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[11]	张玉, 李大勇, 梁昊, 张雨坤, . 风电空心锥形基础水平承载特性及土压力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1404-1412.
[12]	陶志刚, 任树林, 郝宇, 李强, 付强, 何满潮, . 层状反倾边坡破坏机制及NPR锚索控制效果物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 976-990.
[13]	张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[14]	郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[15]	万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于模型试验的古建筑夯土基座抗渗措施研究

Study on anti-seepage measures of rammed earth foundation of ancient buildings based on model test

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10