岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1761-1771.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1657

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环作用下单裂隙炭质页岩能量演化与 破坏特征研究

刘新喜1,李玉1,范子坚1,李盛南2,王玮玮1,董蓬1   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 湖南工程学院 建筑工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411101
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-28 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-03
  • 通讯作者: 李玉,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体稳定性评价与控制方面研究。E-mail: 1986740197@qq.com E-mail: liuxinxi1963@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘新喜,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51674041,No. 52108405);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(No. SJCX202025)。

Energy evolution and failure characteristics of single fissure carbonaceous shale under drying-wetting cycles

LIU Xin-xi1, LI Yu1, FAN Zi-jian1, LI Sheng-nan2, WANG Wei-wei1, DONG Peng1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan 411101, China
  • Received:2021-09-28 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674041, 52108405) and the Research and Innovation Program for Postgraduates in Hunan Province (SJCX202025).

摘要: 为研究干湿循环作用下裂隙炭质页岩能量演化及破坏特征,分别制作完整和裂隙倾角为30°、45°和60°的炭质页岩,利用MTS815岩石力学试验系统进行不同干湿循环作用下的三轴压缩试验,研究了干湿循环对单裂隙炭质页岩强度、破坏模式及能量演化的影响。结果表明:起裂应力、损伤应力和峰值应力处弹性能和耗散能与干湿循环呈指数函数关系;起裂应力处弹性能、耗散能和损伤应力处耗散能对干湿循环的敏感程度较低,损伤应力处弹性能和峰值应力处弹性能、耗散能对干湿循环的敏感程度较高。炭质页岩破坏模式受控于干湿循环和裂隙倾角,干湿循环为主控因素,裂隙倾角为次控因素;裂隙倾角为30°的干燥岩样为拉剪破坏,裂隙倾角为45°和60°的干燥岩样为剪切破坏;随着干湿循环次数的增加,宏观主裂纹长度增大,次要裂纹增加,破坏模式整体上向剪拉破坏发展。随着干湿循环次数的增加,起裂应力处储能水平Kci和损伤应力处储能水平Kcd逐渐增大,起裂和损伤应力处储能水平越高,岩石起裂和损伤更容易;Kcd可作为岩石破坏的预警指标,Kcd越大,岩石越易发生破坏

关键词: 三轴压缩, 单裂隙炭质页岩, 干湿循环, 能量演化, 破坏特征

Abstract:

In order to investigate the energy evolution and failure characteristics of single fissure carbonaceous shale under drying-wetting cycles, intact and fissure carbonaceous shale samples with fissure angles of 30°, 45°and 60° were fabricated respectively. MTS815 rock mechanical test system was used to conduct triaxial compression tests under different drying-wetting cycles. The influence of drying-wetting cycles on the strength, failure mode and energy evolution of single fissure carbonaceous shale were studied. The results show that the elastic energy and dissipated energy at crack initiation stress, damage stress and peak stress present exponential relationships with drying-wetting cycles. The elastic energy and dissipated energy at crack initiation stress and dissipated energy at damage stress are less sensitive to drying-wetting cycle, while the sensitivities of elastic energy at damage stress, and elastic energy and dissipated energy at peak stress are relatively high. The failure mode of carbonaceous shale is dominated by drying-wetting cycle and fissure angle, in which the drying-wetting cycle is the main controlling factor, and the fissure angle is the secondary controlling factor. It is found that tensile shear failure occurs in dry rock sample with fissure angle of 30°, while the dry rock sample with fissure angle of 45°and 60° are subjected to shear failure. With the increase of the number of drying-wetting cycles, the macroscopic length of the main crack increases, the density of secondary cracks increases, and the failure mode transforms to shear-tension composite failure. With the increase of the number of drying-wetting cycles, the energy storage level at crack initiation stress Kci and the energy storage level at damage stress Kcd increase gradually. The higher the energy storage level at crack initiation and damage stress is, the more likely the crack initiation and rock damage occur. Kcd can be used as an warning indicator of rock failure. A larger Kcd indicates that the rock is more vulnerable to failure.

Key words: triaxial compression, single fissure carbonaceous shale, drying-wetting cycle, energy evolution, failure characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451
[1] 陈伟乐, 徐国平, 宋神友, 付佰勇, 虞健刚, 孙苗苗, 丁智, . 风化岩遇水软化的强度试验及力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 67-76.
[2] 周辉, 宋明, 张传庆, 杨凡杰, 路新景, 房后国, 邓伟杰, . 三轴应力下水对泥质砂岩力学特性 影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2391-2398.
[3] 屈永龙, 杨更社, 奚家米, 何晖, 丁潇, 张猛, . 低温−加载作用下白垩系砂岩的变形 破坏特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2431-2442.
[4] 陈锐, 张星, 郝若愚, 包卫星. 干湿循环下地聚合物固化黄土强度 劣化机制与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1164-1174.
[5] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[6] 许健, 武智鹏, 陈辉, . 干湿循环效应下玄武岩纤维加筋黄土 三轴剪切力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 28-36.
[7] 刘婕, 张黎明, 丛宇, 王在泉, . 真三轴应力路径花岗岩卸荷破坏力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2069-2077.
[8] 刘越, 陈东霞, 王晖, 于佳静, . 干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1933-1943.
[9] 卢锋, 仇文革, . 基于能量演化理论的多参数非等比例折减的 安全系数求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 547-557.
[10] 郝延周, 王铁行, 程磊, 金鑫, . 考虑干湿循环影响的压实黄土结构性本构关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2977-2986.
[11] 胡智, 艾聘博, 李志超, 马强, 李丽华, . 干湿循环−动荷载贯序耦合作用下压实粉质 黏土电阻率演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2722-2732.
[12] 刘俊东, 唐朝生, 曾浩, 施斌. 干湿循环条件下黏性土干缩裂隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2763-2772.
[13] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[14] 吝曼卿, 张兰, 刘夕奇, 夏元友, 张电吉, 彭亚利, . 梯度应力作用下模型试件的岩爆破坏细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2984-2992.
[15] 徐晓冬, 孙光华, 姚旭龙, 梁学健, 邵陆航, . 基于能量耗散与释放的充填体失稳 尖点突变预警模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3003-3012.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .