岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3416-3425.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0041

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

交通荷载下加筋土桥台工作性能试验研究

王裘申1, 2, 徐超1, 2,张振1, 2,沈盼盼3,吴伟成1, 2,张逍1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海 200335
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-08 修回日期:2022-03-29 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-05
  • 作者简介:王裘申,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事土工合成材料加筋土桥台及其他相关结构的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技部重点专项(No.2016YFE0105800);国家自然科学基金(No.41772284,No.42002270)。

Experimental study on service performance of reinforced soil abutment subjected to traffic loads

WANG Qiu-shen1, 2, XU Chao1, 2, ZHANG Zhen1, 2, SHEN Pan-pan3, WU Wei-cheng1, 2, ZHANG Xiao1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China
  • Received:2022-01-08 Revised:2022-03-29 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFE0105800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772284, 42002270).

摘要: 加筋土桥台因其具有良好的复合体特性,被广泛应用于各项工程建设,研究它在实际工程条件下的工作性能对其设计和推广具有重要意义。加筋土桥台在服役过程中主要承受交通荷载作用,通过室内大比例缩尺模型的加速应力试验,研究交通荷载条件下加筋土桥台的工作性能,考虑加筋间距与筋材刚度的影响,综合分析了不同交通荷载等级和循环次数下桥台变形与筋材应变的变化规律。研究结果表明,加筋土桥台在交通荷载作用下整体变形随循环次数趋于收敛,其顶部沉降、面板水平位移与筋材应变均远小于规范给出的阈值;各变形值随加载时间呈阶梯状发展,不同条件下变形收敛趋势有所差异;增大筋材刚度和减小加筋层间距有利于控制桥台的变形,筋材刚度对变形的控制作用要优于加筋间距;交通荷载作用下面板水平应变与顶部竖向应变并不满足2倍关系,二者之间的定量关系有待进一步研究。

关键词: 加筋土桥台, 交通荷载, 模型试验, 加速应力法, 工作性能

Abstract: Reinforced soil abutment is widely used in various engineering constructions because of the good composite performance. The study of its working performance under actual conditions is of great significance to design and popularization. Reinforced soil abutment is mainly subjected to traffic loads in service. In this study, an accelerated stress test of large-scale model was carried out to investigate the working performance of reinforced soil abutment under traffic loads, and to analyze the deformation characteristics of the abutment and the strain of the reinforcements under different loading levers and numbers of loading cycles considering some factors such as spacing and stiffness of the reinforcement. The results indicate that the overall deformation of the reinforced soil abutment tends to converge under traffic loads. The settlement at the top of the abutment, the lateral displacement of the facing and the strain of the reinforcements are much less than the threshold suggested by the current specification. The deformation exhibits stepped variations over loading time and the convergent tendency differs under various conditions. Increasing the stiffness of reinforcement and reducing the spacing of reinforcement are beneficial to improve the ability of deformation resistance of the abutment, while the stiffness of reinforcement plays a more important role in deformation control. In addition, the quantitative relationship between the maximum lateral strain at the facing and the maximum vertical strain at the top of the abutment is not two times, and the quantitative relationship between the two needs to be further studied.

Key words: reinforced soil abutment, traffic loads, model test, accelerated stress method, service performance

中图分类号: 

  • TU472
[1] 彭文哲, 赵明华, 杨超炜, 赵衡, . 斜坡桩水平循环特性模型试验及有限杆单元解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 381-391.
[2] 周翔, 蔡静森, 马伟成, 肖皓文, . 物质组成特征对碎石土斜坡变形破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 531-540.
[3] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 程德虎, 张呈斌, 毛航宇, . 土工袋加固膨胀土边坡降雨−日晒循环试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 35-42.
[4] 汤炀, 刘干斌, 郑明飞, 史世雍, . 饱和粉土中相变能源桩热力响应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 282-290.
[5] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[6] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系 离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
[7] 单治钢, 高上, 孙淼军, 陈雨雪, 李利平, 成帅, 周宗青, . 波浪作用下近海滑坡机制模型试验与 数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 541-552.
[8] 刘博, 徐飞, 赵维刚, 高阳, . 隧道工程结构模型试验系统研究综述与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 452-468.
[9] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[10] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[11] 韦超, 朱鸿鹄, 高宇新, 王静, 张巍, 施斌, . 地面塌陷分布式光纤感测模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2443-2456.
[12] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 胡雷, . 三峡库区顺层灰岩岸坡劣化−溃屈灾变机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2568-2580.
[13] 兰景岩, 蔡金豆, 吴连斌, 史庆旗, . 含隧道场地地震动放大效应的深度变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2083-2091.
[14] 柴源, 牛勇, 吕海波, . 水泥胶结钙质砂地层中单桩竖向承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2203-2212.
[15] 樊浩博, 周定坤, 刘勇, 宋玉香, 朱正国, 朱永全, 高新强, 郭佳奇, . 富水管道型岩溶隧道衬砌结构力学响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1884-1898.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .