岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 113-124.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0797

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

成层软土地基预固结处理后桩基水平 承载力估算方法

黄朝煊1,袁文喜1,胡国杰2   

  1. 1. 浙江省水利水电勘测设计院,浙江 杭州 310002; 2. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 冰冻圈科学国家重点实验室 青藏高原冰冻圈观测研究站,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-11 修回日期:2020-10-11 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 作者简介:黄朝煊,男,1983年生,硕士,高级工程师,国家注册土木工程师,主要从事水工结构及岩土工程设计与研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(No. LGF18E090004);浙江省水利厅科技计划项目(No. RC1701);浙江省水利水电勘测设计院科标业项目资助(No. B1803)

An estimation method of horizontal bearing capacity of piles after pre-consolidation treatment for layered soft foundation

HUANG Chao-xuan1, YUAN Wen-xi1, HU Guo-jie2   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China; 2. Cryosphere Research Station on Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2020-06-11 Revised:2020-10-11 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Basic Public Welfare Research Project of Zhejiang Province (LGF18E090004), the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Water Resources Department (RC1701) and the Science Standard Industry Project of Zhejiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey & Design Institute (B1803).

摘要: 目前通过对软土地基预加固处理来提高桩基水平承载力已被工程界认可,但如何在工程前期设计过程中估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值仍是技术难点。基于此,参考Bowles[1]的地基土水平抗力计算式,同时考虑成层软土地基预排水固结处理影响,通过数学推导,推求出根据原状软土室内土工试验抗剪强度指标及预加固处理时间,估算软土地基预处理后桩基水平承载力提高值的实用计算方法。考虑桩侧土弹塑性屈服影响,推导出成层软土中水平受荷桩弹塑性解析解及塑性区深度的计算式,给出了桩顶水平位移、桩身最大弯矩的无量纲计算式及相关计算源代码。依托于浙江省某水闸桩基工程案例,根据提出的计算方法对桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等性状进行预估计算,并与地基预处理前、后现场试桩检测值进行验证对比,认为桩基水平承载力、桩顶水平位移及桩身最大弯矩等预估计算成果与工程现场试桩的检测值较接近,对类似工程设计具有较好的参考价值。

关键词: 地基预加固处理, 桩基水平承载力, 水平抗力, 幂级数解法, 屈服位移, 抗剪强度指标, 解析解

Abstract: At present, the improvement of the horizontal bearing capacity of the piles by pre-consolidation of the soft soil foundation has been well recognized by practising engineers. However, how to estimate the increment of horizontal bearing capacity of piles during the pre-engineering process is still difficult. In this article, a practical calculation method for estimating the increment of horizontal bearing capacity of piles is established based on the Bowles[1] method and by considering the impact of pre-drainage and pre-consolidation treatment of the layered soft soil foundation. This method provides an effective way to calculate the shear strength index and pre-consolidation treatment time based on the shear strength of undisturbed soft soil by laboratory test. Meanwhile, the elastoplastic solution of the horizontally loaded pile and the calculation formula of the plastic zone depth of layered soft soil foundation are analytically derived, based on the influence of elastoplastic yielding of soils surrounding the pile. In addition, the source code for computing the horizontal displacement of the pile top and the maximum bending moment of the pile body are given. Finally, the horizontal displacement, bearing capacity and the maximum bending moment of piles in the sluice pile foundation engineering case in Zhejiang Province are calculated according to the proposed method. The results of the field tests before and after the pre-consolidation treatments are compared. It is found that the estimated results are close to the test results, which may provide a good reference for similar engineering designs.

Key words: pre-consolidation treatment, horizontal bearing capacity of pile foundation, horizontal resistance, power series solution method, yield displacement, shear strength index, analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • U 473
[1] 秦爱芳, 江良华, 许薇芳, 梅国雄, . 连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1345-1354.
[2] 凌道盛, 赵天浩, 钮家军, 朱松, 单振东, . 混合非齐次边界下非饱和土一维固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 883-891.
[3] 周凤玺, 周志雄, 柳鸿博, . 非均匀地基与均匀地基解答之间的相似关系: 弹性波速[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 892-898.
[4] 杨爱武, 杨少朋, 郎瑞卿, 陈子荷, . 轻质固化盐渍土三维力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 593-600.
[5] 朱赛男, 李伟华, LEE Vincent W, 赵成刚, . 平面P1波斜入射下海底洞室地震响应解析分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 93-103.
[6] 冯庆高, 蔡兵华, 冯晓腊, 袁祥, . 侧向有限越流承压含水层中非完整井非 稳定流模型及解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 168-176.
[7] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[8] 胡安峰, 周禹杉, 陈缘, 夏长青, 谢康和, . 结构性土一维非线性大应变固结半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2583-2591.
[9] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[10] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[11] 刘国钊, 乔亚飞, 何满潮, 樊勇, . 活动性断裂带错动下隧道纵向响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 923-932.
[12] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[13] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[14] 李强, 高 松, 牛红凯, 尚艳亮, . 尾矿库浸润线解析解及适用性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3714-3721.
[15] 张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压 竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[6] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[7] 孙 勇. 滑坡面下双排抗滑结构的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .
[8] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[9] 王淑云,鲁晓兵,赵 京,王爱兰. 粉质黏土周期荷载后的不排水强度衰化特性[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2991 -2995 .
[10] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .